Looks like it's 701, and I'm gonna call the order of the land use urban redevelopment committee meeting on 318 2026 at 701 p.m.

In attendance tonight, of course, is me, Glenn Price, co-chair.

I also see my co-chair uh Ryan Yuce here.

I'm gonna call the rest of the role.

Uh if you don't mind, I'll do that now and we'll move on to uh other business.

Uh so uh again, representative views, coach are use.

Oh, we're good.

Never mind.

I was gonna ask Barbara to promote uh Carl and Rep Adams and also rep words to the uh to be part uh participants in the meeting.

Good stuff.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you, sir.

Uh Representative Adams.

What is it?

Representative Beckham.

Representative Beckham.

Representative Beckham.

Representative Boudreau.

Present.

Representative Fields?

President.

Representative Finkel.

Present, Mr.

Chairman.

Representative Gardner.

Present.

Representative Politia.

Present.

Excellent.

And let me see.

Uh I see one, two ex officio meeting uh members, Representative Gardner, Representative Wurz, Representative Weinberg as well has joined us.

Thank you all for uh for sitting in.

Have I missed anyone this evening?

Uh either members of the committee or uh ex officio meeting uh members.

All right.

So that being said, I'd like to take up the first and only item on the uh agenda for this evening.

It's item LU32.006.

It's a results excuse me, it's a resolution accepting Pembroke Drive as a city street by property owners, pending certification by the city engineers that Pembroke Drive meets the qualifications for acceptance.

This was submitted by Representative Weinberg, and I will uh move.

I will move to approve the resolution and then we we might have other business on this resolution.

But first I need to move to approve the resolution.

Do I have uh a motion to approve the resolution?

Motion to approve.

Is there a second?

Second second.

Thanks very much.

And uh as I understand now, the path forward is there might be a motion to uh before I move forward, Representative Weinberg, you had uh a point of information or a point of clarification.

Yeah, I'd I'd I'd like to suggest since since I'm only ex officio on this committee, I can't make a motion.

I can't make a motion to amend.

Uh, but I'd like to I'd like to suggest uh a motion to amend.

And here's what here's what's going on.

Um it's on uh as we've done more uh as we've done more research um on Pembroke Drive, it is unclear exactly who owns the road.

Uh it's clear that the the uh the the signatures on uh are on the petition are clearly the signatures of the property owners um along the road, but uh their deeds appear to say that their properties abut uh Pembroke Drive.

And but they don't specify that they include Pembroke Drive.

Uh so the um uh so the property owners um on Pembroke Drive, the residents are uh uh hiring an attorney to it looks like they're going to hire an attorney to conduct the research um to understand exactly who owns Pembroke Drive.

This might become very murky because uh the uh this this neighborhood was developed back probably before the merger of the town and the city.

And um, as anyone who lives up here in North Stanford knows, town uh land records are not always very clear.

Um so uh on the other hand, uh uh the uh uh the the residents, the property owners along Pembroke Drive, um, have already uh gotten a proposal from a contractor to rehabilitate the road and bring it up to uh the city's uh code standards.

Um so uh I will you know I don't want to merely recommit this.