The 32nd Board of Representatives Fiscal Committee budget deliberations meeting for the 2026-2027 budget year was held on April 30, 2026, from 7:01 p.m. to 7:22 p.m. The committee reviewed two proposed cuts, discussed the Board of Education budget, and addressed the East Side Library funding issue. Co-Chair Eric Morrison and Co-Chair Andrew Zachary presided.
Okay, the time is 701 p.m. It is April 30th, 2026, and this is the 32nd Board of Representatives Fiscal Committee budget deliberations meeting for the 2026-2027 budget year. We'll take a note of who's in attendance from the committee at the moment, myself, co-chair Eric Morrison, co-chair Andrew Zachary, Representative Tom Bouchard, Representative Kira Dorsey, Representative Parker Johnson, Representative Noel Lepine, and also from the board, I see with us Representative Matt Boudreau, Representative Nicole Beckham, Representative Scott Stone. Okay. All right. Our first proposed cut this evening. Budget book page 341. Active Medical and Life Office of Benefits and Insurance. Item 1,08301 520120. Proposed cut of 673,360, which represents the savings. So this represents that difference. Do you have anything to add or have I covered it pretty well? No, that's correct. Okay. All right. So I'd like to entertain a motion from a member of the committee to take uh to to uh approve this cut. So moved, seconded, and seconded. Thank you. Any discussion on this item. Okay. Seeing none. All those in favor, please say aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed. Any abstentions. Okay. That carries unanimously 600. Okay. Uh next one. Uh, operating budget page 181, parks and recontracted services 100 2134, 540601. Proposed cut of $50,000, cutting $161 down to $111. Uh I'll entertain a motion to approve this cut. So moved. Seconded. Seconded. Discussion, Coach Zachary. Yes, I spoke to Brian Murray at the parks and rec. Uh, and he pointed out that this was carry over. He had estimated a number that was carried over from previous budget and was not needed. It's the extra expense to manage, uh pay for the downtown special services district to manage park. Uh the estimate was too high in his opinion, and we could get away with $50,000 reduction. And that is what we I proposed here. And he was happy with that number. Any comments? Any further discussion on the cut? I'll note that we're joined by committee member representative Shante Graham. Okay, seeing no hands, we'll try this by voice vote. All those in favor of the cut of $50,000 to parks and rec contracted services, please say aye. Any opposed?