On August 26, 2025, the Stockton City Council and concurrent authorities held a closed session at 3:30 PM and a regular session at 5:30 PM in Council Chamber, City Hall, 425 N. El Dorado St., Stockton, CA. The council recessed at 8:02 PM, reconvened at 8:10 PM, and adjourned at 9:46 PM. No agenda document was available; this summary is based on the meeting minutes and raw transcript. All seven members were present during the regular session after Councilmember Ponce arrived at 5:46 PM. The City Attorney reported no reportable action from closed session.
Closed session convened at 3:31 PM and returned at 5:10 PM. Agenda items were conference with legal counsel regarding existing litigation (Kurt Wilson v. City of Stockton, San Joaquin County Superior Court Case No. STK-CV-UWM-2019-12404), possible initiation of litigation, and conference with labor negotiator. There was no public comment and no reportable action.
The consent calendar was approved 7-0, with items 12.1, 12.4, 12.5, 12.10, 12.12, and 12.13 considered separately.
The remaining consent items, approved in the 7-0 block vote, included approval of city council minutes, the sixth revised 2025 meeting calendar, a Driving Under the Influence Selective Traffic Enforcement Program grant of $500,000, the Lower Sacramento Road Widening and Bridge Replacements professional services contract of $4,335,231.44, the On-Call Fence Services contract (up to $100,000 annually, up to $300,000 total), the Cedar Ridge Water Service Lateral Replacement construction contract of $144,130, and mayoral appointments to council committees.
Open forum
Consent item public comment
SESP hearing public comment
Brown Act referral public comment
DEI investigation public comment
Wild 'N Out public comment
Stockton Economic Stimulus Program (SESP) Update and Amendments Stephanie Ocasio, Director of Community Development, reviewed the program's history and four options: maintain current SESP; grandfather entitled projects and phase out new waivers; amend without grandfathering; or eliminate SESP. She said the Public Facilities Fee update was expected to produce draft fees by the end of 2025 and adoption in 2026, and that $94 million in fees had been waived. Council discussion focused on the 2008 city limit boundary, the fee nexus, affordable housing, and the original 2015 resolution's disadvantaged-community workforce requirement. Vice Mayor Lee said he would push to terminate the program if the BIA/NAACP workforce requirement was not fulfilled. Councilmember Blower moved to adopt option 2 with a five-year sunset; the motion carried 7-0. The approved amendment gives waivers to active entitled projects and projects deemed complete at the time of council action, and gives new projects gradually reduced waivers in six-month increments over the next 18 months, with a five-year sunset.
16.1 Brown Act Referral City Attorney Lori Asuncion asked for clarification on what to refer and where. Vice Mayor Lee made an initial motion to refer existing alleged violations involving himself, Councilmember Enriquez, and former Interim City Manager Colangelo to the Civil Grand Jury, with DA referral if findings were found; future allegations would follow the same process. Councilmember Padilla proposed future allegations go directly to the DA. Mayor Fugazi proposed referring both existing and future allegations to both the Civil Grand Jury and DA. A motion to call the question failed 4-3. The meeting recessed at 8:02 PM and reconvened at 8:10 PM. A motion to overturn the presiding officer's ruling failed for lack of a second. The final motion, made by Mayor Fugazi and seconded by Councilmember Villapudua, directed the City Attorney to refer existing alleged Brown Act violations to the Civil Grand Jury and the District Attorney's Office for prosecution, and any future reported violations to go through the same process. It passed 7-0.
16.2 406 Investigation into DEI Funding City Attorney Asuncion said the investigation was already authorized, but council policy 3.14 requires designation of an oversight body. Vice Mayor Lee moved to assign oversight to the Audit Committee, seconded by Councilmember Blower. Councilmember Villapudua moved to assign oversight to an independent auditor, then amended to full council oversight, seconded by Councilmember Ponce. A call to question passed 7-0. The full-council oversight motion failed 1-6, with only Councilmember Villapudua voting yes. The original Audit Committee motion then passed 7-0. Public comment supported the Audit Committee approach.
16.3 Wild 'N Out Event and Mitigation Funds Mayor Fugazi said the item was intended to clear up misinformation. City Attorney Asuncion said she had advised Vice Mayor Lee to consider recusal due to potential conflict, but that recusal was an individual decision under the Political Reform Act. Councilmember Villapudua moved to direct the city attorney to retain independent outside counsel to investigate use of funds related to the Wild 'N Out event at Adventist Health Arena for potential councilmember misconduct, specifically Charter Section 1000 and Government Code Section 1090 violations, and to take legal action or refer to proper authorities if violations were found. Vice Mayor Lee's amendment to make investigation results and costs public was accepted. The motion passed 4-3: Mayor Fugazi, Councilmembers Villapudua, Padilla, and Ponce in favor; Councilmembers Blower, Enriquez, and Lee opposed. Vice Mayor Lee said the event sold almost 8,000 seats and created a $640,000 economic impact, and he denied wrongdoing. Councilmembers Blower and Enriquez opposed the investigation as a costly use of taxpayer money and said staff should be trusted.
Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to this closed session for Stockton City Council today on the 26th of August. Let's go ahead and do roll call. Councilmember Blower. Present. Councilmember Enriquez. Uh Councilmember Ponce is absent. Councilmember Padilla is absent. Councilmember Via Padua is absent. Vice Mayor Lee? Here. And Mayor Fugazi. Present. We have a quorum. Okay. Uh, I don't see any additions to our closed session agenda. This body will recess to closed session pursuant to government code section five four nine five six point nine D one to confer with this attorney regarding agenda item three point one. This body will recess to closed session pursuant to government code section five four nine five six point nine D four to confer with its attorney regarding agenda item three point two. And this body will recess to closed session pursuant to government code section five four nine five seven point six to discuss agenda item three point three. Whatever's most convenient for you. Okay, so we'll just go over there. Okay. Okay, any public comment? We have none. Okay. Good evening and welcome to tonight's Stockton City Council meeting on August 26, 2025. We are gonna go ahead. Is it echoing or is that me? Oh Lord, they they've got the volume up. So we're gonna go ahead and do roll call. Council Member Councilmember Blauer. Present. Councilmember Enriquez. Present. Councilmember Ponce is absent. Councilmember Padilla. Present. Councilmember Via Padua. Present. Vice Mayor Lee. Present. Hey Mayor Figazi. Present. We have a quorum. Thank you. Uh now we're gonna have our invocation. We have Chaplain Kevin White here. Welcome. Let us pray. Almighty God, it is humbling to stand here knowing that for a hundred and seventy-five years, men and women have gone before us to work hard to make Stockton a better place. To make it a peaceable place where people can live out a genuine love for one another, build a lives for themselves, and make the world a better place.