The Stockton City Council met on January 13, 2026, in a regular session that included a closed session, public comments, a consent agenda, a public hearing on street vendor fees, and several new business items including appointments, a "Compassionate City" resolution, a discussion on the Wild 'n Out investigation, and a report on a DEI investigation. The meeting lasted from 4:00 PM to 10:59 PM, with multiple recesses.
Good afternoon and welcome to our first meeting of 2026 here on the 13th of January. We will go ahead and call this meeting to order at four o'clock and start with roll call. Councilmember Blauer. Present. Councilmember Enriquez. Present. Councilmember Ponce is absent. Council. Oh she's on her way. She's right here. Councilmember Padilla? Present. Councilmember Villa Padua. Present. Vice Mayor Lee. Here. And Mayor Fugazi. Present. We have a quorum. Wonderful. Um I don't see that we have any additions to close the closed session agenda. Um, I will let the audience know that this body will be recessing to closed session to conference with legal counsel regarding existing litigation pursuant to look for the number. Um government code 54956.9 D2 and 54956 point nine E. We will also be going into conference with uh labor negotiations, which is 54957.6 to discuss agenda item 3.2, item 3.4 and 3.5. This body will uh recess to closed session pursuant to government code section 54957b. Okay, so do we have any um public comment? We do, mayor. Yes, okay. Yolanda Aman. Good evening, Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Council. Um sorry, hold on, wrong way. That's three minutes. Sorry. Okay. I'm here tonight um to place on public record that if it is indeed the plan um to replace our so city attorney Lori Assunction. I asked to take a moment to put yourself on this side of the dais from where the public sits. This does not look like a routine personal matter, it looks like retaliation from us. This is the second attempt to remove her from office or her position. When patterns repeat themselves, the public is entitled to question the motive and why. It gives the appearance as that there's something going on, maybe there's another list or things that we're not aware of. I'll be honest with you at the beginning. I was also swayed by the narrative of who supposedly needed to go. I accepted the narrative without doing my full full due diligence to understand the why and the larger agenda behind it. That was a mistake that I made. And today I see through different lenses. We are in a political climate defined by lack of trust, one that this council has helped create. Because as you often say, this simply does not pass this mail test. In contrast to this, it shows a difference between leadership that builds trusts and actions that erode it. So please let's stop to spin the false narrative and misleading narratives. People of Stockton deserve transparency, not suspicion.