The Stockton Planning Commission met on June 24, 2021, at 5:30 PM in the Council Chamber at City Hall. Chair Anne Mallett presided, with all seven commissioners present (Anne Mallett, Jeff Sanguinetti, Gerardo Garcia, Brenda Jones, Xavier Mountain, Waqar Rizvi, Brando Villapudua). The meeting covered a consent calendar, a public hearing for a proposed retail commercial center development, and interviews for the Cultural Heritage Board. The commission recessed briefly for technical issues and adjourned at 6:55 PM.
Item 5.1 (Retail Commercial Center at East Hammer Lane & Maranatha Drive): Staff presented a proposal for a 4.32-acre development including an ARCO AMPM fueling station and convenience store (Type 20 ABC license), a Sonic Drive-In restaurant, a Black Bear Diner, and an Elite Car Wash. The project required an EIR addendum, pre-zoning to Commercial General (CG), a tentative parcel map, a commission use permit, and design review. The site is outside city limits and pending annexation. Commissioners discussed stormwater management, sewer/storm drain extensions, reciprocal parking/access agreements, and concerns about car wash proliferation and security. Commissioner Villapudua expressed concern about too many car washes in Stockton and security at similar developments. Commissioner Sanguinetti proposed amending conditions to require the sewer main to extend to the southern property line, storm drain improvements to connect to the future Oregoni system, and a reciprocal parking/access agreement. The applicant’s team agreed to work with staff. A 10-minute recess (6:12 PM to 6:19 PM) was taken. The commission voted 7-0 to approve five resolutions:
Item 6.1 (Cultural Heritage Board Interviews): The commission interviewed four candidates for four vacancies on the nine-member Cultural Heritage Board. The board has been unable to meet since December 2020. Candidates were: Tejpaul Bainiwal (scholar and community leader), Bryan Baldeon (local resident passionate about culture), Mary Jo Gohlke (local historian and author), and Matt Holmes (homeowner and former National Park Service staff). A fifth applicant, Mr. Vigil, withdrew before the interview. Each candidate answered four questions regarding their motivation, the relationship between historic preservation and economic development (including demolitions), city vs. property owner responsibilities, and availability. Commissioner Mountain recused himself from voting on Matt Holmes due to a personal connection. After scoring, the top four candidates (Bainiwal, Baldeon, Gohlke, Holmes) were selected.
Good evening, everyone, and welcome to the planning commission meeting of June 24th, 2021. At this time, I would like to ask the city clerk to please take roll. Chair Mallet? Present. Vice Chair Sangetti? Here. Commissioner Garcia? Present. Commissioner Mountain? Here. Commissioner Risby? Here. Commissioner Jones? Here. Commissioner Via Pudua? Present. We have a quorum. Thank you. And now I would like to ask Commissioner Mountain to please lead us in the flight salute. I pledge an allegiance to the five of the United States of America and to republic under the individual tea and justice for all. All right, so agenda item three is the consent agenda. Would anyone like to comment on the consent calendar? Okay, so no seeing nobody. Um could I get a um a motion for the consent? I've moved the motion to prove the consent. Could everyone please vote? Motion passes. Thank you. And at this time, um move to agenda item four, public comment. This section of the agenda is reserved for public comment on anything within the jurisdiction of the commission. Um there will be a time limit. Do we have any um blue cards or do we have anyone that would like to speak? I have no public comment cards, Chair. Okay. And then moving on to item number five, public hearings environmental assessments. Agenda item 5.1 is an initial study addendum to the 2040 general plan environmental impact report, pre-zone tentative parcel map, commission use report permit and design review requests for the proposed retail commercial center development at the southeast corner of East Hammer Lane and Marantha Drive. APN 1303013. And do we have any um commissioner comments or disclosures? Okay, Steph, could you please present? Good evening, Chair Maladet and members of the commission. Item 5.1 is for planning application number P190718, which is an initial study and addendum to the general plan EIR, pre-zone application, tentative parcel map, commission use permit, and design review request for a proposed commercial retail development on East Hammer Lane and Maranatha. The project is located on the south side of East Hammer Lane, just west of 99 and East Maranatha Drive, where the recently approved annexation for the Carmax project is located. Also, directly east of the site is the annexation project for the Hammer Hotel, which you recently reviewed a couple weeks ago and approved part of and made recommendations for approval to the city council. As with the hotel site, this site is not within the city of Stockton city limits, but with your recommendation of approval, we'll proceed to the city council for consideration for incorporation into the city, and then to LAFCO, which is the local agency formation commission for San Joaquin County. This is a street view of the current conditions along the south side of Hammer Lane. It is a vacant site with a stoplight pole and signal arm at the southeast corner of East Hammer Lane and Maranatha Drive. The site has a current general plan designation of commercial and is surrounded by commercial to the north, south, east, and west. And a little further north is general plan designation of residential. Also, like the hotel site, this site currently does not have a zoning designation, but with the pre-zone request, the applicant is proposing to zone the site as commercial general, which is CG. The process for this project involves the similar steps as the hotel site.