OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Stockton Planning Commission Meeting, September 23, 2021

Planning CommissionThursday, September 23, 2021
BodyStockton, California
SessionPlanning Commission
DateThursday, September 23, 2021
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
2:18

Good evening, everyone, and welcome to the planning commission meeting of September twenty-third, twenty twenty-one.

2:24

At this time, I would like to ask the city clerk to please take roll.

2:29

Chair Mallet, present.

2:30

Vice Chair Sanguinetti?

2:32

Here.

2:32

Commissioner Garcia?

2:34

Here.

2:34

Commissioner Mountain?

2:36

Here.

2:36

Commissioner Risby?

2:38

Here.

2:39

Commissioner Jones?

2:40

Here.

2:40

Commissioner Via Pudua?

2:42

Here.

2:43

We have a quorum.

2:44

Thank you.

2:45

I would now like to ask Commissioner Garcia if you could leave us in the flag salute.

2:53

Ready?

3:06

Liberty and justice for all.

3:14

Okay, agenda item three, the consent calendar.

3:19

Would anyone like to comment on the consent calendar?

3:22

If I may, madam chair, I'd like to split it and uh do item three point two first because I need to recuse myself from item three point one.

3:35

Okay.

3:35

That's fine.

3:37

Does anyone else have any other comments?

3:42

Okay, so um commissioner Garcia.

3:47

Uh yes, thank you, Chair.

3:49

I was not at those uh meetings, however, I did review the packets and watch the videos.

3:55

Okay, thank you.

4:09

Um Vice Chair Sangetti.

4:12

Yeah, seeing that there are no more comments, I'm assuming that we're segregating the items three point two will go first.

4:20

And if that's the case, I'd like to make a motion that we approve three point two, which are the minutes for the two planning commission meetings.

4:32

Okay.

4:34

All right, so I have a motion um item three point two from vice chair sanguinetti and a second from um commissioner mountain.

4:45

Could everyone please vote?

4:50

Motion passes seven zero.

4:53

Okay, and so you're recusing yourself on item three point one.

4:57

I guess that means I go in the other room.

5:00

Yes.

5:02

All right.

5:02

Could I have a motion for that?

5:10

Item 3.1.

5:15

I move the motion to approve item 3.1.

5:19

Second.

5:20

Okay, motion from Commissioner RISV and a second from Commissioner Garcia.

5:26

Consent item 3.1.

5:29

Please vote.

5:37

Motion passes 6-0.

5:39

I believe Sanguinetti's vote is on air.

5:41

How did Commissioner Sanguinity?

5:46

He has superpowers.

5:49

Let me clear the votes and then we'll vote again.

5:52

Okay.

6:05

Cheers.

6:08

Okay.

6:09

Motion passes 6-0.

6:11

All right.

6:12

Thank you.

6:14

Um to agenda item four, public comment.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Cannabis Regulation█████████████████████████████████████████████52%
Religious Accommodation██████████████16%
Zoning And Land Use██████████11%
Procedural████████9%
State and Federal Legislative Advocacy███3%
Technology and Innovation███3%
Public Comment██2%
Food Truck Ordinance██2%
Public Safety██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Stockton Planning Commission Meeting - September 23, 2021

The Stockton Planning Commission met on September 23, 2021, at 5:30 PM for a regular meeting. The meeting included approval of consent calendar items and a study session on the cannabis regulatory program. No public comments were received. The commission took action on two consent items and held a workshop on defining religious facilities in relation to cannabis businesses.

Consent Calendar

  • 3.2 – Approval of Planning Commission Minutes: The commission voted 7-0 to approve the minutes from the July 22, 2021, and August 12, 2021, meetings.
  • 3.1 – Request for Two-Year Time Extension for Elderberry Tentative Map (P21-0667): The commission voted 6-0 to approve a two-year time extension for the Elderberry project. Vice Chair Sanguinetti recused himself from this item.

Public Comments & Testimony

No public comments were made.

Discussion Items

Cannabis Regulatory Program – 2021 Policy Project Workshop/Study Session #2

Staff (Stephanie Ocasio, Assistant Director of Community Development) presented on the definition of religious facilities as it relates to the cannabis regulatory program. Staff explained that federal law (RLUIPA), case law, and IRS/DOJ definitions treat churches as more than just worship spaces, making it legally difficult to distinguish between worship and other religious activities. Staff recommended against creating a separate definition for cannabis purposes, as Title 16 definitions must apply citywide. The current 600-foot distance requirement from religious facilities was discussed, along with the option to retain or eliminate the waiver process.

Commissioners debated various options:

  • Commissioner Garcia proposed allowing a reduced distance (e.g., 400 feet) with letters of support from the religious facility.
  • Commissioner Sanguinetti suggested using building code assembly use classifications to define sensitive uses.
  • Other commissioners favored keeping the waiver process for case-by-case evaluation, noting that distance is not always a perfect measure (e.g., across a major roadway).
  • Commissioner Jones and Villapudua emphasized the importance of separation from churches.
  • Commissioner Rizvi and Mountain supported maintaining the waiver to allow flexibility.

Staff noted that the workshop was informational only; no formal action was taken. Staff will incorporate commission feedback and bring back a redline version of the ordinance for a public hearing, likely in October 2021. The commission requested materials be provided at least two weeks in advance.

Commissioners Comments

  • Commissioner Mountain asked about the impact of new state laws (SB 9 and 10) on single-family zoning. Staff reported that the governor had signed bills allowing more housing types on single-family lots, effective January 2022, and the city is working to integrate them into the development code.
  • Commissioner Rizvi highlighted the need for commissioners to receive agenda materials earlier, suggesting they should have access as city employees. Staff will follow up on legal possibilities.
  • Commissioner Villapudua requested an update on traffic safety improvements on Miracle Mile following a fatal incident at a car show. Staff will follow up with the city manager.
  • Staff reminded commissioners to complete IT security training and iPad updates.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Calendar: Approved minutes (7-0) and Elderberry time extension (6-0).
  • Cannabis Workshop: No formal action; direction given to staff to prepare a revised ordinance for future public hearing, incorporating discussion on definitions, distance requirements, and waiver options.
  • Commissioner Comments: Staff to follow up on state law integration, material distribution, security training, and Miracle Mile concerns.
  • Meeting adjourned at 6:35 PM.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening, everyone, and welcome to the planning commission meeting of September twenty-third, twenty twenty-one. At this time, I would like to ask the city clerk to please take roll. Chair Mallet, present. Vice Chair Sanguinetti? Here. Commissioner Garcia? Here. Commissioner Mountain? Here. Commissioner Risby? Here. Commissioner Jones? Here. Commissioner Via Pudua? Here. We have a quorum. Thank you. I would now like to ask Commissioner Garcia if you could leave us in the flag salute. Ready? Liberty and justice for all. Okay, agenda item three, the consent calendar. Would anyone like to comment on the consent calendar? If I may, madam chair, I'd like to split it and uh do item three point two first because I need to recuse myself from item three point one. Okay. That's fine. Does anyone else have any other comments? Okay, so um commissioner Garcia. Uh yes, thank you, Chair. I was not at those uh meetings, however, I did review the packets and watch the videos. Okay, thank you. Um Vice Chair Sangetti. Yeah, seeing that there are no more comments, I'm assuming that we're segregating the items three point two will go first. And if that's the case, I'd like to make a motion that we approve three point two, which are the minutes for the two planning commission meetings. Okay. All right, so I have a motion um item three point two from vice chair sanguinetti and a second from um commissioner mountain. Could everyone please vote? Motion passes seven zero. Okay, and so you're recusing yourself on item three point one. I guess that means I go in the other room. Yes. All right. Could I have a motion for that? Item 3.1. I move the motion to approve item 3.1. Second. Okay, motion from Commissioner RISV and a second from Commissioner Garcia. Consent item 3.1. Please vote. Motion passes 6-0. I believe Sanguinetti's vote is on air.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com