The Stockton Planning Commission met on September 23, 2021, at 5:30 PM for a regular meeting. The meeting included approval of consent calendar items and a study session on the cannabis regulatory program. No public comments were received. The commission took action on two consent items and held a workshop on defining religious facilities in relation to cannabis businesses.
No public comments were made.
Staff (Stephanie Ocasio, Assistant Director of Community Development) presented on the definition of religious facilities as it relates to the cannabis regulatory program. Staff explained that federal law (RLUIPA), case law, and IRS/DOJ definitions treat churches as more than just worship spaces, making it legally difficult to distinguish between worship and other religious activities. Staff recommended against creating a separate definition for cannabis purposes, as Title 16 definitions must apply citywide. The current 600-foot distance requirement from religious facilities was discussed, along with the option to retain or eliminate the waiver process.
Commissioners debated various options:
Staff noted that the workshop was informational only; no formal action was taken. Staff will incorporate commission feedback and bring back a redline version of the ordinance for a public hearing, likely in October 2021. The commission requested materials be provided at least two weeks in advance.
Good evening, everyone, and welcome to the planning commission meeting of September twenty-third, twenty twenty-one. At this time, I would like to ask the city clerk to please take roll. Chair Mallet, present. Vice Chair Sanguinetti? Here. Commissioner Garcia? Here. Commissioner Mountain? Here. Commissioner Risby? Here. Commissioner Jones? Here. Commissioner Via Pudua? Here. We have a quorum. Thank you. I would now like to ask Commissioner Garcia if you could leave us in the flag salute. Ready? Liberty and justice for all. Okay, agenda item three, the consent calendar. Would anyone like to comment on the consent calendar? If I may, madam chair, I'd like to split it and uh do item three point two first because I need to recuse myself from item three point one. Okay. That's fine. Does anyone else have any other comments? Okay, so um commissioner Garcia. Uh yes, thank you, Chair. I was not at those uh meetings, however, I did review the packets and watch the videos. Okay, thank you. Um Vice Chair Sangetti. Yeah, seeing that there are no more comments, I'm assuming that we're segregating the items three point two will go first. And if that's the case, I'd like to make a motion that we approve three point two, which are the minutes for the two planning commission meetings. Okay. All right, so I have a motion um item three point two from vice chair sanguinetti and a second from um commissioner mountain. Could everyone please vote? Motion passes seven zero. Okay, and so you're recusing yourself on item three point one. I guess that means I go in the other room. Yes. All right. Could I have a motion for that? Item 3.1. I move the motion to approve item 3.1. Second. Okay, motion from Commissioner RISV and a second from Commissioner Garcia. Consent item 3.1. Please vote. Motion passes 6-0. I believe Sanguinetti's vote is on air.