The Stockton Planning Commission met on March 13, 2025, at 5:30 PM and adjourned at 7:32 PM. The meeting included approval of past meeting minutes, public comments, establishment of an ad hoc committee to review the draft Development Code Ordinance, and two training presentations from the Deputy City Attorney and Community Development Department. All votes were unanimous except where noted.
Good evening, everybody. Tonight is a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of City of Stockton held on March 13th, 2025. Roll call, please. Chair Sanguinetti. Present. Vice Chair Mudzenberg. Here. Commissioner Graves. Present. Commissioner Hall. Present. Commissioner Bopari is absent. Commissioner Eamon. Present. We have a quorum. Okay. So our first item of business here is there any public comments? You want me to take. Oh, I okay. Pledge allegiance. Yeah. It's on your agenda. Sorry. So I'm gonna have uh come Commissioner Amen lead the Pledge Allegiance. Ready begin. I think allegiance to the five of the United States of America. And to the Republic for which it stands. Under comment invisible justice for all. Thank you. Okay. So um public comments, please. Next up is uh consent, the consent calendar. Yeah, well, we're gonna publicly want to do public comment for the public comments first since there's somebody here and first up here. He doesn't have to stay for everything. First up, we have Dan Richardson. Yeah, I just wanted to come and can you state your name and address for us, please. Dan Richardson, 1220 North Pershing Avenue. Okay. Yeah, um, city resident. Um I just wanted to come. It's the first meeting I've been able to attend since the new board members have been uh or commissioners have been appointed, and uh I just want to congratulate all of you. Um the only thing I wanted to add to that comment was um that I hope that in the future when we get proposals for approval of new businesses within the city of Stockton, uh new building permits, that type of thing that come before the planning commission, that we don't just accept that it meets the guidelines within the city. Uh we had an issue with a cannabis uh facility that wanted to open on my side of town, and fortunately city council saw better uh to stop that from opening. It met technically the guidelines of the city to be within 600 feet of a school, thousand feet of another dispensary, etc. etc. But that area already had two storefronts in it, and we didn't need a third, um, to be honest with you, and that got stopped. Um again, uh what I'd ask is that we don't just rubber stamp what comes before the commission, that the commission looks at it in detail to make sure it's the right thing for Stockton. It's the right thing for the community that it's going to be located in. Um I lived in cities around Northern California that the planning commission approved things like elevation of buildings so that your storefronts were um uniform within a given district, you know, that they looked good for the city, they attracted other businesses to come, things like that. Um so I it's not a criticism of anybody or the commission.