Audit Committee Meeting Summary - December 16, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Audit Committee Meeting Summary - December 16, 2025
The Audit Committee convened to address the impact of the recent mayoral election on its annual planning cycle and to review progress on community engagement with district councils. The primary focus was a strategic proposal to pause the standard topic selection process to facilitate early collaboration with the incoming mayor and her administration, followed by a detailed update on the committee's expanding outreach efforts to St. Paul's district councils.
Consent Calendar
- No items were explicitly voted on as part of the consent calendar; all agenda items were discussed as substantive discussion items.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Civic Engagement Survey Response: Staff presented data indicating that public topic submissions currently range between five and eight viable ideas annually. Committee members expressed that this number was "quite impressive" and attributed the quality of submissions to the selection process being driven by departmental votes rather than low public participation.
- Request for Participation: Members of the public (identified as council members and committee members) were invited to attend upcoming district council presentations either in person or remotely, with the committee noting the hybrid format of future meetings.
Discussion Items
-
Strategic Pause on Topic Selection: The Chair proposed pausing the predetermined audit topic calendar to prioritize engagement with the newly elected mayor and her transition team. The rationale included the uncertainty of new departmental leadership and the desire to align audit objectives with the administration's priorities to ensure they are viewed as "friends and not enemies" rather than adversaries during a period of potential administrative change.
- Position of Support: Mr. McVay expressed full support for the pause, noting that it aligns with broader terms of reference and creates an opportunity to identify shared priorities for service delivery improvement. He further argued that collaboration with the new administration would create a "virtuous effect cycle" to improve future community submissions.
- Position of Support: Ms. Dilworth added her voice in favor of the proposal, emphasizing the need to establish a positive, collaborative footing with the new administration after a "touch and go" relationship with the previous one.
- Position of Support: Mr. Lester agreed that collaboration yields better results with "willing audit partners" and expressed hope that the new administration would be receptive. He inquired about direct contact with the transition team regarding the February meeting invitation.
- Administration Update: The Chair confirmed that while no formal invitation has been extended for the February meeting, the Mayor-Elect has expressed enthusiasm for the committee's work during one-on-one meetings with the Council Vice President and others, citing her campaign values of asking questions and understanding details.
-
District Council Community Engagement Update: Mr. McVay provided a status report on outreach to the 17 district councils, noting progress from contact with only three councils previously to nine currently, representing a "300% increase."
- Schedule Details: Specific meeting dates were confirmed or tentatively scheduled. These include Como Park (January 7), West 7th Fort Road Federation (January 12), Highland Park (February 5), St. Anthony Park (February 12), and Hamlin Midway (February 24). Some dates (Capital River, Summit Hill, McAllister Groveland) remain to be determined or require verification from the executive's notes.
- Engagement Strategy: The committee discussed the strategy for future meetings, agreeing that meetings would likely extend from January through April to allow for proper scheduling without overwhelming the district councils. It was suggested that spreading outreach over March and April is warranted to ensure meaningful engagement.
Key Outcomes
- Decision to Pause and Collaborate: The committee agreed to pause the current topic selection process and plans to invite the Mayor-Elect and her team to the February 17th meeting to discuss future audit priorities.
- Outreach Schedule Approval: The committee approved the ongoing district council engagement plan, with dates ranging from January to February (potentially extending to April) and agreed to a hybrid format for attendance.
- Presentation Workflow: Mr. McVay was granted approval to distribute his draft slide deck to committee members via email for comments without requiring a formal prior approval vote for the final presentation.
- Next Steps:
- Draft an invitation for the Mayor-Elect for the February 17th meeting.
- Mr. McVay will finalize the slide deck and compile a list of primary literature regarding municipal audit governance to be distributed over the holidays.
- A master calendar of district council meetings will be distributed to all committee members by the end of the meeting's follow-up.
- Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned with a goal to reconvene in February.
Meeting Transcript
Well, but okay. Great. And then the um the next topic is uh it was sort of mine. Um so we of course put lots of time and energy into coming up with this calendar for the this the rest of this year and next year that would become the standard calendar by which we would choose topics at this time of year, we would choose two to take us into next year um and do community engagement accordingly and really try to get into a rhythm where we did the same thing every year. Um then we had a mayoral election, which I think we all anticipated the election, but maybe didn't fully anticipate the effects of a mayoral transition. Um this audit committee was started, has has never had a different mayor or a different administration. Um and as I started to think about the impact of a new mayor in a new administration, um, it occurred to me that it might make sense, and I wanted to bring this to the group rather than kind of plowing forward with our predetermined uh agreed to schedule to pause and have some time at this committee to meet the mayor elect and her team and or her team, share what this committee does, um, hear how the mayor elect thinks that we could be useful. I know that she is really interested in auditing a lot of different functions and departments, and we've talked often about how we want to be working in concert with the administration as much as we can be. I think we have an opportunity for that here. Um then also we may probably will be uh seeing new department directors um in each department. And so even if we weren't going to have that conversation with the mayor elect, um we will likely be working with new people in the new year, and it seems to me to make sense to um give some time to figure out who those people are going to be to see which programs are changing. We've in the past wanted to shy away from auditing something that is in the midst of changing because what's the point? It's about to change. So for all of those reasons, I wanted to um suggest to the group for your thoughts and for your feedback that we um pause in our topic selection process. We also have not gotten a great response to putting out our survey again. Um so it's not like we're seeing not like we would be rejecting lots of brand new ideas. Um, and instead plan to invite the mayor elect and her team to join us um at our February meeting and um work with her in between to hear her thoughts on how the audit committee could be useful and decide how to move forward based on those conversations. Um and again with the hope of getting back into a regular rhythm and having our calendar figured out, etc., but not wanting to let that process be the enemy of um meaningful engagement with the new administration. So with that, I will stop talking and I would welcome other folks' thoughts. Um, both is this a good idea or not, and also other ideas about how we can engage with the new administration and sort of adapt to the new circumstances that we are in. I will see Mr. McVay. Go ahead. Thank you, Madam Chair. Uh I think it's wise that we uh take a pause and perhaps that we can have uh the mayor elect and or her department heads come and meet with us just because A is part of our term broader terms of reference right, and also uh it gives us an opportunity to really co collaborate and uh see where we have shared priorities, both in terms of the council and um the new administration in terms of our uh audit objectives where we can uh improve uh service delivery. The I will also say that this will probably help us with better planning for next year for 2026, because I think that we can actually align our calendar to the calendar that you propose for the whole committee. I love that calendar. Um civic engagement with the district councils this year. And so I think that'd be incredibly valuable for that reason alone. Because I think once we do sit down with the district councils, which I will discuss more in the next agenda item. Uh I think there'll be a greater response from the community in terms of uh folks actually submitting uh topics for us to consider. Because I'm not sure what the usual uh what's the usual corpus or body of topics that we get in a given year. What has it been historically, Madam Chair? In terms of how many topics ideas do we get submitted each year? Yeah, how many submissions do we get in a given year usually great question? Ms. Vang, what would you say? Um we get about five or eight viable topic ideas for the audit committee to consider, but most of the I the topic ideas that we end up selecting are those that's been voted by the departments um so that there's greater interest there, uh especially with the administration. What the current administration actually it's not that bad of a number coming from the public. Um five to eight, you said. Can you repeat that? Five to eight, coming for the public. Yeah, that's not that bad of a number, actually. That's quite impressive. Like if you compile and compile all the information to kind of gauge exactly what topic they're seeking, it leads to that. Okay. Okay. Yeah. Um duly noted, and uh, I think your your points about potentially right, like there being a virtuous effect benefit cycle on topic submissions um makes a lot of sense. Um, and give the community engagement more time to work because I think the survey is one thing, but I as we were just sort of alluding to, it's often more helpful to get feedback in different ways, like from the community engagement because people are not coming in cold, they're aware of what kind of topics are really are viable, et cetera.
openpublica.com