STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The St. Pete Beach City Commission met on Tuesday, March 24, 2026, at 6:00 PM in the Commission Chambers. The meeting included approval of minutes from March 9, the installation of new elected officials, presentations on a proposed Country Thunder music festival, a University of Florida legal analysis of a parking-based assessment, the Boca Ciega Drive reconstruction design, and a permit process update. Action was taken on consent items, a stormwater outfall contract, and parking fee changes, while discussion on a wireless facilities ordinance was deferred pending state action.
It is March twenty fourth, twenty twenty six at this six PM. Stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. Commissioner Robinson. Here. Commissioner Isniki? Here. Commissioner Maldonado? Here. And Mayor Patrulla? Here. We have a quorum. Thank you. First item on the agenda is the approval of the March 9th minutes. I have a question about those. Sure. And and maybe for help with clarification from city attorney, just because we've had a lot of emails and I've had calls about the motion for ordinance 2026-03. I needed clarification as to what the motion was and what was drawn, because I I feel what's written is not what I voted for. So I just wanted some clarification. We've distributed the closed caption from the transcription of the video stream of the meeting. And it states is there a motion? Make the motion to adopt with modification of 40-foot setback from dwellings unless variants and 500 separate 500 separation requirements were possible and technically feasible without limiting communication services for the final reading of ordinance 2026-03. And then I said, did you want to include the additional language about the negotiation period? Everything that's in the citizen proposal here said yes, yes. Because again, this goes to more than just ground equipment now that now this is all supporting structures and polls, and we can do that as a subsection. It will be a new subsection four to take their three and their entire three paragraphs and make that a new subsection. Absolutely, yeah. And we'll add in the 500 feet where possible and technically feasible without impacting coverage. Is that the final version of the motion? Yes, it is. I'll second to the clerk. Commissioner Maldonado, yes. Vice Mayor Marriott, no. Commissioner Robinson, yes, Commissioner Rosnecky, yes. Mayor Patella, yes, and then the motion carries. And I think that um the motion maker um can discuss the motion that he made. We had he did say variance, and I was trying to um point out that neither the citizens nor staff was going for variance anymore because it involved a public meeting, public hearing, which are not allowed, and public hearing and public meeting to meet me in the same thing. Um so I took that as yes, he would substitute the negotiation period that both the citizen and the staff had in there. And so that's what we took to prepare the ordinance. Did you want to change the minutes to reflect this exact language? And I think that would be appropriate. We could attach this to the minutes, or we could put this in the minutes itself. So let me ask you, um city attorney or or commissioner to could clarify. In that in that presentation, I think the words I agree with the negotiation that I clearly remember that that we stated that. Um of the things that is coming up is whether it was mandatory or not.