Syracuse City Joint Schools Construction Board Meeting - February 26, 2026
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Syracuse City Joint Schools Construction Board Meeting - February 26, 2026
The Joint Schools Construction Board (JSCB) met on February 26, 2026, to receive updates on Phase III of the school construction plan, approve several architect contracts, and adopt resolutions regarding financial authorizations. The meeting was chaired by an unidentified member, with reports from Secretary Joe and the Program Manager.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of the January 29, 2026 meeting minutes was moved, seconded, and approved without objection or abstention.
Discussion Items
- Phase III Comprehensive Plan Approval: Secretary Joe reported that the Office of State Controller and State Education Department have approved the Phase III comprehensive plan, a key milestone allowing the board to proceed with architect contracts. He noted the RFP for construction management services is underway with a deadline extended by a week. Additionally, a draft Project Labor Agreement (PLA) feasibility study was sent to board members the previous evening after technical difficulties. The study, prepared by the same consultant used in Phases I and II, is a preliminary step; board members are to review it before the next meeting in March. The Program Manager noted that the comprehensive plan approval came six weeks later than anticipated but efforts are underway to recoup time, aiming for construction start in summer 2027.
- Architect Contracts: The board approved three architect contracts for Phase III design and inspection services:
- Resolution 5: Kid Kidney Architects for Webster Elementary School (contract not to exceed $2 million).
- Resolution 6: Kid Kidney Architects for Seymour Elementary School design work.
- Resolution 7: La Bella Associates for Nottingham High School. All contracts were selected through an RFP committee process and approved without objection.
- Board Member Designation for Financial Documents: Resolution 3 authorized the designation of any board member to sign financial documents for payments from the JSCB trustee. The resolution expanded authorization to all seven members (previously three or four), requiring only two signatures. A discussion clarified that the council president is no longer an automatic member of the JSCB; the mayor now appoints three members and the superintendent two. The resolution passed unanimously.
- Monthly Payment Authorization: Resolution 4, the monthly authorization to pay JSCB contractors, was approved unanimously.
Key Outcomes
- Approved minutes of January 29, 2026.
- Approved Resolution 3 (board member signing authority) unanimously.
- Approved Resolution 4 (monthly payment authorization) unanimously.
- Approved Resolution 5 (Webster Elementary architect contract) unanimously.
- Approved Resolution 6 (Seymour Elementary architect contract) unanimously.
- Approved Resolution 7 (Nottingham High School architect contract) unanimously.
- Next steps: Board members to review PLA feasibility study; public input sessions scheduled for the week of March 9, 2026; CM procurement responses due March 10, 2026 with interviews later in March; architect kickoff meetings beginning next week.
Meeting Transcript
Motion to accept the January twenty-ninth, twenty twenty-six minutes. Second? Second. Any objections? Any abstentions. Hearing none, that item is approved. Report secretary. Yes, good morning, everyone. Good morning. So some good news to report. As you may have heard, we have approval from the Office of State Controller in the State Education Department for our phase three comprehensive plan. The letter from the Comptroller is in your packet. But we're all we're all set. And um that allows us to approve. Oh, thank you. Yeah, that's uh staff and Turner did a great job on getting all that done pursuing the state agencies. So I'm glad to hear that. Thank you. And uh that allows us today to move on and approve several architect contracts now that we have our approved comprehensive plan and our RFP process for the construction management services is underway. The RFP is out there, and uh I believe it's been extended by a week, but we're we're moving to collect uh responses and uh when they're in an RFP committee will be set up similar to the architect RFP process. Do you know what the deadline is? Oh, I that asked the program. March, okay. Thank you. And uh finally, uh last evening I sent out after some technical difficulties, uh our draft project labor agreement feasibility study. Uh this is the document that under state law we are required to uh conduct and and approve if we choose to go on and and enter into a PLA. It it doesn't mean it's the first step in the process. So this study just ratifies that there's economic savings if we choose to enter into a PLA. Okay. So the document is um as with any of these things extensive. So what I wanted to do is send it out a month ahead of our next March meeting. Okay. And if there's any questions, I'd be glad to fill them individually by email. Or uh uh depending how we feel, we can have this um a meeting in March with our consultant at the March board meeting. Okay. Um so after folks look at it, maybe we can do some communication and see how we feel about it. I'm sorry, that came last night. Yes. Okay. Sorry, it didn't go out earlier. No, no, probably. Because of the city firewall, there were technical difficulties transmitting it. Such a large document, but um in any case, it it is similar to what we did in phase one and phase two. But um in any case, it it is similar to what we did in phase one and phase two. Actually, it's the same consultant, so uh there's some consistency there. Perfect. But the the program manager and staff has reviewed it as well. That completes my report. Do I need a motion to accept your report? Uh no, I just usually make an oral presentation and then that's it.
openpublica.com