Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
Syracuse City held a work session on 2026-10-27, followed by a special business meeting. Councilmember Julie Robertson was excused to attend a mosquito abatement conference; Councilmember Abe Pollard arrived later. The work session included public comment, planning discussions, public works and administrative items, and informational reports. No formal votes were taken during the work session; the council later unanimously moved into closed session for personnel and land sale matters.
Yeah, whatever. Yes, it's rendered again. I am a gift. Oh maybe. Okay. I'd like to welcome everybody out to the Syracuse City work session. Um we have uh one council member Julie Robertson is excused as she is attending mosquito abatement uh conference. And uh Abe uh Pollard will be with us uh late in the meeting. We had some family business at this exact same house. Um the first thing on our agenda is public comment. I will open it up if there's anyone from the public that would like to make a comment. Is there anyone? Oh, okay. Uh the rules are you need to state your name for the record and your address so that we know where you're from. And uh we cannot respond to anything that's not on the agenda, so go ahead. You have up to three minutes. Um, my name's Kale Gurney. Um, I live over on 1557 West 1390 South. Okay. I wanted to talk about the idea of a community garden. Um as part of my school, I'm with the Ruth of Tomorrow Club, which is an environmentalist group. And I wanted to talk about the idea of community garden for see if it could be proposed on future agendas. Okay. Um evidence and research I looked at was a 2025 systemic review of 37 studies by research researchers at the University of Glitter and published in the journal Discover Sustainability, which found that community guard contribute to environmental stewardship, social cohesion and public health. Um it also notes that uh green spaces are shrinking in fast-growing cities. Um, and not that Syracuse is going to lose any green spaces, but we are a bad growing city, and those are all high expense. Okay. Thank you. We also had one emailed in for the record. I'll let Maurice read that into the record. Mayor Mon and members of the city council, thank you for the opportunity to comment on the updated transportation utility fee study. I understand the city is trying to address a real long-term road maintenance feed. The study indicates that approximately 14% of city lane miles are currently in poor condition, and projects that figure could increase to 25% over the next 10 years if the annual maintenance funding remains at approximately 1.5 million. The study also models potential single family residential fees ranging from approximately six to fourteen dollars per month, depending on the annual maintenance level ultimately selected. Before the city adopts a new reoccurring household fee, I would encourage the council to clearly identify the pavement condition goal it is trying to achieve the amount of additional funding actually needed to reach that goal, and how existing transportation revenues factor into that calculation. I have lived in my current home in Syracuse for approximately seven years, and to my knowledge, the streets in my neighborhood have never been crack sealed during that time. The city's own discussion of payment management recognizes the importance of maintenance treatments that economically extend pavement life. As the council considers additional funding, I would appreciate knowing whether the city intends to establish a formal preventative maintenance schedule for all city streets, including regular crack sealing and other preservation treatments before roads deteriorate to the point that more expensive rehabilitation is required. Residents should also be able to see on an annual basis how much revenue was collected, which road projects and preventative treatments were completed, how overall pavement conditions changed, and whether the fee level continues to be necessary. Finally, as Syracuse continues to experience commercial development and additional sales tax growth, I hope the council will consider whether increases in other transportation related revenues can offset or reduce the amount residents are asked to pay. If a transportation utility fee is adopted, I would favor a structure that can decrease when other revenues improve rather than becoming a permanently fixed additional charge. Okay. That's the last one. So I will close public comment and move us on to our planning items. Yeah, Noah join us. The first item on our agenda is a recommendation from planning commission. This is a proposed change to property located at 2617 South, 3000 West. Currently uh listed as A1, and the request is to move to A3 to R3.