OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Tacoma City Council Study Session - June 17, 2025

City Council Study SessionTuesday, June 17, 2025
BodyTacoma, Washington
SessionCity Council Study Session
DateTuesday, June 17, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:02

I'd like to call to order the city council study session of June 17th, 2025.

0:07

Clerk, will you please call the roll?

0:08

Councilmember Bushnell.

0:10

Deputy Mayor Daniels.

0:12

Councilmember Diaz.

0:13

Councilmember Hines.

0:15

Absent Councilmember Rumba.

0:17

Here.

0:17

Councilmember Sidalgay.

0:18

Here.

0:19

Council Member Scott.

0:20

Here.

0:20

Councilmember Walker.

0:21

Here.

0:21

Mayor Woodards.

0:22

Here.

0:23

The study session material is sent to you at 11.

0:26

All right.

0:27

Our first agenda item today is a report on a regional fire authority.

0:33

And I'd like to call on Deputy Manager Hung Kim for introductions and to begin the presentation.

0:40

Thank you, Mayor Woodards, members of council, and just with uh with what's laid here, I'm gonna pass it right over to Chief Staling's Aleyama for presentation with Teresa Green, our finance manager in the fire department uh for presentation on a uh thorough uh start to the conversation in terms of a future state for the city of Tacoma.

1:01

Thank you.

1:03

Thank you.

1:03

Go ahead, Chief.

1:04

All right, good afternoon, Mayor, City Council.

1:06

Thank you for uh letting us join you today.

1:09

Um, like uh the deputy city manager uh stated that we're just gonna be doing an overview of what an RFA is.

1:15

So next slide.

1:18

So in our agenda, it's gonna take three seconds.

1:20

Yep.

1:21

All right, there we go.

1:22

So uh we're gonna go through some of the factors for uh a regional fire authority, like the definitions, formation process, and timeline, governance, funding, uh, and then also what a feasibility study will look like and get for us, and then also next steps.

1:38

So, what is an RFA?

1:40

Uh it's a municipal corporation that allows uh fire districts, municipalities, um, and tribal nations to join together for the provision of fire and emergency services.

1:50

Uh this was a tool that was uh adopted by the state legislature in 2004 and supplements other options for joining, such as mergers between fire districts, uh annexations of cities into fire districts, interlocal agreements, and then also contracting for services, which we currently do.

2:08

Uh RFAs have independent tax authority, and to implement an RFA, you must uh put it on a ballot and have it approved by voters.

2:16

And really the purpose, the the main purpose of an RFA is uh to improve the services that you're providing to your community while achieving cost efficiencies through combining resources from different jurisdictions.

2:34

So this chart compares fire departments and fire districts to an RFA.

2:39

So, first off, you'll notice that fire departments and fire districts are both just one entity.

2:44

However, a regional fire authority, the definition of regionalization is that you are combining resources.

2:50

So you have to have at least two entities to be able to pull off an RFA.

2:54

We couldn't do it just by just by ourselves.

2:57

Uh also the uh the coverage areas for all of the different um types of protection jurisdictions.

3:06

The city limits are for fire departments, um, but districts like you see in Gig Harbor can also have unincorporated areas.

3:12

So Gig Harbor is not only the city of Gig Harbor, but it also has uh a large portion of unincorporated Pierce County and regional fire authorities, depending on what jurisdictions are um are going to be included, um, it would be the the outskirts of all of their that the regional fire authority would just take on all of their current um fire fire service areas.

3:34

Governing bodies for fire department uh is obviously you all, city council uh for fire districts, it's a board of commissioners that are appointed, and then for a regional fire authority, um it's a governing board that that is made up of uh members from the participating uh entities.

3:52

Primary funding, as you can see, the majority of options for fire districts and regional fire authorities are similar to what we are already have access to, with the addition of the fire benefit charge.

4:04

And some of the examples that we have uh below for fire districts is West Pierce, Central Pierce, Gig Harbor, uh, and the regional or Puget Sound uh RFA is just north of us.

4:14

Uh and they actually have uh seven uh entities that make up their regional fire authority.

4:21

So here's a process and timeline.

4:23

Um and it doesn't have to look like this, but we were just trying to kind of outline what hopefully the timeline would look like if we decided to go this this route.

4:31

So a feasibility study can take anywhere from six to nine months, and the reason why it would take that long is because the the company or the consulting firm that is working on it is gonna need to meet with all the entities that are want to be involved and work with the their staff uh and the fire department to get a lot of uh a lot of different information.

4:50

If after that um they come to a conclusion that yes, this is a good option for this community, uh then at that point uh the jurisdictions would come together and form a governing uh a planning committee, and that would every jurisdiction that would be involved in that would have three seats on that planning committee.

5:08

So everybody would have a voice in creating the plan that really is the founding document for the RFA, and that's also what you would use if when it goes to a ballot.

5:18

So things that the planning committee would be deciding would be defining governance, what the governing board is gonna look like, how many seats each jurisdiction will have, um, service models, organizational structure, and all of those types of things.

5:31

That can take anywhere between nine and uh nine months to a year.

5:35

Once their plan uh is solidified and all the uh governing bodies approve the plan or all the other jurisdiction approve the plan, then it must go on the ballot at the same election for all jurisdictions that are involved.

5:47

So, as we all know, there's only there's not an election every month, right?

5:50

And so it can take six to nine months to get to to choose which election that ever that the RFA is gonna go on.

5:57

So then you would put it on the ballot.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Safety█████████████████████████████████████████████66%
Fire Department Operations██████████████20%
Procedural███5%
Budget Equity Analysis███5%
Fiscal Sustainability2%
Public Finance1%
Public Engagement1%
Summary of Proceedings

Tacoma City Council Study Session - June 17, 2025

This study session, convened at 12:00 PM on June 17, 2025, covered three major briefing items: a presentation on the Regional Fire Authority (RFA) concept, an emergent opportunity to purchase two stock fire engines, and a proposal for a police lateral hiring incentive. Council also received committee reports and later moved into closed and executive sessions.

Discussion: Regional Fire Authority (RFA)

  • Presentation by Fire Chief Sionna Stallings-Ala’ilima and Teresa Green (Finance Manager) outlined the RFA model: a municipal corporation allowing multiple jurisdictions to combine fire and emergency services, requiring at least two entities and voter approval (simple majority for RFA; 60% supermajority if a fire benefit charge is included).
  • The feasibility study (estimated $85,000–$100,000, 6–9 months) would analyze fiscal health, partnering options, and service models. A planning committee (3 seats per jurisdiction) would then draft the founding plan (9–12 months), followed by a ballot election (6–9 months). Total timeline: 2–3 years.
  • Councilmember Diaz expressed nervousness about spending up to $100k given budget constraints but acknowledged the need. Mayor Woodards requested a memo on funding sources for the feasibility study before proceeding.
  • Councilmember Rumba questioned governance fairness for larger cities like Tacoma; the chief explained that seat allocation and voting weights are determined by the planning committee.
  • Councilmember Bushnell clarified that a fire benefit charge is not based on assessed value and can be adjusted by the governing board, offering more flexibility than a property tax. Councilmember Hines noted the benefit of risk-based pricing.
  • No vote was taken; staff will provide a funding memo before further action.

Discussion: Tacoma Fire Department – Emergent Engine Purchase

  • Deputy City Manager Hyun Kim and Chief Stallings-Ala’ilima presented an opportunity to purchase two stock fire engines (currently in production for another agency) at a cost of $2 million ($1.25M from general fund ending balance, $750K from TFD service contract funds). The engines would be delivered in 6–7 months instead of the typical 32–52 months.
  • The department has 23 apparatus total; 16 are primary response engines. As of June 17, only 14–15 were in service due to breakdowns, with $600,000 already spent on major repairs in recent months. The fleet includes engines over 18 years old.
  • Councilmember Walker requested clarity on the source of general fund money (~$1.25M). Kim explained it would come from 2024 ending fund balance (approx. $17M above reserves) due to timing and vacancies, with plans to absorb the cost through mid-budget adjustments. Councilmembers expressed support, noting the urgency and long lead times.
  • Consensus was reached to walk on a motion at the evening meeting to authorize a sole-source contract for the two engines.

Discussion: Tacoma Police Department – Lateral Incentive Proposal

  • Chief Angela Jackson presented a $2.4 million, three-year program to offer a $50,000 bonus to lateral officers, aiming to fill 24 vacancies. The bonus is spread over three years to retain officers. Currently, 64% of patrol officers have fewer than 5 years of experience. Lateral officers could be on the street in 60 days vs. 12 months for entry-level hires.
  • Cost avoidance per lateral officer versus entry-level is estimated at $74,000 (salary savings during shortened training). The program also aims to reduce overtime expenditures (currently $7M–$12M annually due to vacancies).
  • Councilmember Walker and Deputy Mayor Daniels requested detailed breakdown of costs and impacts on the general fund. Councilmember Sidalgay asked about background vetting; Chief Jackson confirmed thorough checks including polygraph and psychological exams. Councilmember Diaz requested historical data on the previous $25,000 incentive (20 hires, 18 still on staff).
  • Councilmember Scott questioned whether the fire and police requests compete; Kim stated both are public safety priorities but would strain mid-budget requests.
  • Council directed staff to develop the program and return with fuller details; no vote was taken at the study session, but the item may be brought back for action.

Key Outcomes

  • Regional Fire Authority: No vote. Staff to provide a memo on funding for a feasibility study (~$85–100k) before council considers proceeding.
  • Fire Engine Purchase: Council consensus to authorize staff to walk on a motion at the June 17 evening meeting for a sole-source contract of two stock engines at $2 million, using general fund ending balance and TFD service contract funds.
  • Police Lateral Incentive: Council directed staff to refine the proposal (including cost breakdown and historical data) and return for formal consideration; no immediate vote.
  • Other: Councilmember Bushnell announced a future amendment to the comprehensive plan regarding electric fences in C2 zoning districts. The meeting adjourned into closed and executive sessions (labor strategy and potential litigation/applicant evaluation).

Meeting Transcript

I'd like to call to order the city council study session of June 17th, 2025. Clerk, will you please call the roll? Councilmember Bushnell. Deputy Mayor Daniels. Councilmember Diaz. Councilmember Hines. Absent Councilmember Rumba. Here. Councilmember Sidalgay. Here. Council Member Scott. Here. Councilmember Walker. Here. Mayor Woodards. Here. The study session material is sent to you at 11. All right. Our first agenda item today is a report on a regional fire authority. And I'd like to call on Deputy Manager Hung Kim for introductions and to begin the presentation. Thank you, Mayor Woodards, members of council, and just with uh with what's laid here, I'm gonna pass it right over to Chief Staling's Aleyama for presentation with Teresa Green, our finance manager in the fire department uh for presentation on a uh thorough uh start to the conversation in terms of a future state for the city of Tacoma. Thank you. Thank you. Go ahead, Chief. All right, good afternoon, Mayor, City Council. Thank you for uh letting us join you today. Um, like uh the deputy city manager uh stated that we're just gonna be doing an overview of what an RFA is. So next slide. So in our agenda, it's gonna take three seconds. Yep. All right, there we go. So uh we're gonna go through some of the factors for uh a regional fire authority, like the definitions, formation process, and timeline, governance, funding, uh, and then also what a feasibility study will look like and get for us, and then also next steps. So, what is an RFA? Uh it's a municipal corporation that allows uh fire districts, municipalities, um, and tribal nations to join together for the provision of fire and emergency services. Uh this was a tool that was uh adopted by the state legislature in 2004 and supplements other options for joining, such as mergers between fire districts, uh annexations of cities into fire districts, interlocal agreements, and then also contracting for services, which we currently do. Uh RFAs have independent tax authority, and to implement an RFA, you must uh put it on a ballot and have it approved by voters. And really the purpose, the the main purpose of an RFA is uh to improve the services that you're providing to your community while achieving cost efficiencies through combining resources from different jurisdictions. So this chart compares fire departments and fire districts to an RFA. So, first off, you'll notice that fire departments and fire districts are both just one entity. However, a regional fire authority, the definition of regionalization is that you are combining resources. So you have to have at least two entities to be able to pull off an RFA. We couldn't do it just by just by ourselves. Uh also the uh the coverage areas for all of the different um types of protection jurisdictions. The city limits are for fire departments, um, but districts like you see in Gig Harbor can also have unincorporated areas. So Gig Harbor is not only the city of Gig Harbor, but it also has uh a large portion of unincorporated Pierce County and regional fire authorities, depending on what jurisdictions are um are going to be included, um, it would be the the outskirts of all of their that the regional fire authority would just take on all of their current um fire fire service areas. Governing bodies for fire department uh is obviously you all, city council uh for fire districts, it's a board of commissioners that are appointed, and then for a regional fire authority, um it's a governing board that that is made up of uh members from the participating uh entities. Primary funding, as you can see, the majority of options for fire districts and regional fire authorities are similar to what we are already have access to, with the addition of the fire benefit charge. And some of the examples that we have uh below for fire districts is West Pierce, Central Pierce, Gig Harbor, uh, and the regional or Puget Sound uh RFA is just north of us. Uh and they actually have uh seven uh entities that make up their regional fire authority. So here's a process and timeline.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com