Tacoma City Council Study Session – July 15, 2025: Initiative 2 Review and Sponsorships
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Tacoma City Council Study Session – July 15, 2025
The Tacoma City Council met in study session on July 15, 2025, to review Initiative Measure No. 2, a citizen-initiated labor standards ordinance, and to consider two sponsorship requests. Mayor Woodards presided; six councilmembers were present (Daniels, Diaz, Rumba, Sidalgay, Scott, Woodards) and three were absent (Bushnell, Hines, Walker). No public comment was taken.
Discussion Items
Initiative Measure No. 2 Review
- City Attorney Chris Bacha (referred to as "Botcha" in the transcript) and Interim City Manager Hyun Kim ("Young Kim" in the transcript) presented the initiative process and its substance.
- Charter process: Section 2.19 of the Tacoma City Charter governs initiatives. The city attorney reviews petitions for form within 10 working days; ballot titles have a 10-day appeal period; signature gathering must occur within 180 days; and petitions must be signed by 10% of registered voters. Upon validation, the council may adopt the ordinance directly or refer it to the next general election.
- Timeline: The petition was initially submitted January 13, 2025; corrected petitions were filed February 4; ballot title notice was given February 18; signature gathering began March 5; signatures were submitted June 17; county verification was received July 9; and the city clerk validated the petition July 10.
- Substance: The initiative would set a $20/hour minimum wage for large employers (500+ employees) and $18/hour for medium and small employers, effective January 1, 2026. It also includes scheduling rules, workplace safety requirements, panic button mandates, anti-retaliation protections, enforcement provisions, and private rights of action. Large employers would need to provide 14 days' advance notice of schedules; employees could decline shifts without such notice.
- Council questions and concerns: Councilmembers raised concerns about application to city, state, and federal employees; interaction with collective bargaining agreements (the city has 33 unions covering about 4,000 employees); enforcement costs and staffing; potential budget impacts; franchise counting (franchises count toward the parent company's size); effects on hospitals and public safety; and the need for a job-loss study.
- Staff commitment: Interim City Manager Kim stated staff would return on July 29 with preliminary information, fiscal scenarios, and responses to councilmembers' questions.
Sponsorship Requests
- Tacoma Historical Society 2025 Destiny Dinner: Mayor Woodards requested a sponsorship to support a sesquicentennial event celebrating Tacoma's history. She noted the city's founding in 1884 and that the city would be recognized as a lead sponsor.
- 2025 BIPOC Health and Wellness Fair: Mayor Woodards, co-sponsored by Councilmembers Sidalgay and Bushnell, requested a $5,000 sponsorship for the July 26 event at the Eastside Community Center. The fair offers free health screenings, educational sessions, and community resources, and is organized by Abundance Health LLC.
Key Outcomes
- The council directed staff to return on July 29, 2025, with detailed information on Initiative Measure No. 2.
- The two sponsorship requests were presented and discussed; no formal vote was taken during the study session.
- The council unanimously approved a motion to enter executive session pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(i) and (g) for potential litigation and to evaluate a job applicant, not to exceed 30 minutes.
- The council unanimously approved a motion to hold a closed session on labor strategy under RCW 42.30 after adjournment of the study session.
- The study session recessed; no further public business was conducted.
Meeting Transcript
I would like to call to order the city council study session of July 15th, 2025. Clerk, will you please call the roll? Councilmember Bushnell, absent Deputy Mayor Daniels. Councilmember Diaz. Councilmember Hines. Absent. Councilmember Rumba here. Councilmember Sidalgay. Here. Councilmember Scott. Here. Councilmember Walker. Absent Mayor Woodards. Here. The study session material sent to you at 1101. Before we move on, and I can't figure it out. I apologize. My computer here is has sound to it. I might have to flip the keyboard out. Oh if I do that, that's why I couldn't. Okay, oh, here we go. Okay. All right. Sorry, there was this echo back at the table, everyone. All right. So our first agenda item today is initiative measure number two review. And I'm going to call on interim city manager Young Kim and City Attorney. Um Chris Botcha to begin the presentation. Thank you, Madam Mayor, members of council, deputy mayor. Um today we're here to discuss uh and also provide you with some information for the recently um certified and approved signatures that were uh submitted with initiative two. Um and I'm gonna turn it over to the city attorney and then uh for some close out uh remarks after his presentation. Thank you. Uh thank you, Mr. City Manager Chris Botcha, City Attorney. Um what I'd like to do is give an overview of the city charter process for submittal of initiative petitions, and then we'll talk a little bit about the timeline for the submission of this particular initiative, and then we'll talk about some of the material terms and conditions uh that are initiative two. Um so unless there are any questions, I'll begin the conversation about the city charter. Um section 2.19 of the Tacoma City Charter is the section that provides for the power of the people to provide legislation through an initiative process. Uh I'll remind the council that the initiative process is not set forth in the state constitution, and while there is a constitutional provision for initiatives, it has to do only with statewide initiatives, not local ballot measures. There is no state law requirement for local governments to have an initiative and referendum process. Uh that's up to the elected officials to determine if they would adopt an initiative and referendum process or to the voters to approve that process through a charter amendment for those jurisdictions that have a charter. And so in this case, the Tacoma City Charter has since um uh at least since 1953 when the new charter was adopted, and um I think we've had initiative and referendum provisions in the city charter going back to the turn of this last century. Uh but section 2.19 is the sole authority and process and parameters around which the uh citizens of this community have the right to, or the residents of this community have the right to uh file an initiative petition. Umce the initiative petition is filed, the charter provides that the city clerk within a day must forward that petition to the city attorney's office for the city attorney's review, and the city attorney's review is to be completed within 10 working days, not calendar days but working days, uh, and the review is to determine whether or not the petition meets the statutory and charter requirements as to form. Um the review is not for the purpose of determining the validity of the petition or uh to opine on whether it's a good idea or a bad idea, is just to determine if the form of the petition is proper. Um and once that determination is made, uh that gets transmitted back to the city clerk. The city clerk then forwards to the petitioners, the uh ballot title uh because the city attorney must prepare a ballot title that's required in the charter as well and in state law. And that's forwarded to the petition petitioners. And there is a 10-day appeal period in which anyone can appeal the ballot title for sufficiency. That's a provision in state law and also in our city charter. If no appeal is filed in 10 days, then the petitioners can begin gathering signatures.
openpublica.com