Tacoma City Council Study Session: Public Utility Board Stipends (Nov 4, 2025)
Tacoma City Council Study Session: Public Utility Board Stipends (Nov 4, 2025)
The City of Tacoma City Council convened a study session on November 4, 2025, to discuss a proposal by Councilmember Bushnell to establish monthly stipends for members of the Public Utility Board (TPU). The discussion focused on the financial barriers to equity, the unique scope of the TPU's responsibilities, and comparisons with other municipal boards. While no formal vote was taken during the study session due to the need for further research on state laws and charter implications, the council expressed strong interest in advancing the proposal.
Consent Calendar
- No routine approvals or consent calendar items were presented or adopted during this study session.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Deputy Mayor Daniels: Requested to be promoted to the presenter's room online during the session; subsequently seconded a motion to remove the community forum from the November 12th agenda.
- Councilmember Hines: Expressed concern regarding the disparity between paying appointed TPU board members more than elected positions (School Board and Parks Tacoma) and the legal restrictions preventing stipends for the Planning Commission. However, Councilmember Hines reiterated support for the proposal, emphasizing that the TPU's workload is distinct and that payment should be based on the job's requirements, not the incumbent's financial status.
Discussion Items
- Proposal Overview (Councilmember Bushnell): Proposed a monthly stipend of approximately $1,600 (totaling $95,760 annually) to reduce economic barriers and ensure the board reflects the diversity of ratepayers, including those outside city limits. Funding is to come from the TPU budget, not the City of Tacoma's general fund. Stipends do not include health benefits or retirement system membership.
- Support for Stipends (Councilmember Walker): Co-sponsored the motion, highlighting that most Public Utility Districts across Washington state compensate their board members. Expressed alignment with the goal of recognizing the significant workload and responsibility of the position.
- Concerns and Alternative Proposals (Councilmember Diaz): Stated inability to support the proposal "as it is currently written." Raised concerns about appointing paid officials versus elected officials and the disparity with the unpaid Planning Commission. Suggested that monetary stipends alone may not solve the lack of representation from lower-income backgrounds or BICAP program users. Proposed an alternative: creating income-capped board positions or seats reserved for those with specific lived experiences or utility usage histories.
- Comparison to Other Boards (Councilmember Rambach): Questioned whether other appointed boards (e.g., Housing Authority, Library) receive stipends. Inquired about the feasibility of adding seats specifically for ratepayers located outside the City of Tacoma limits, noting that currently 49% of TPU ratepayers are outside city boundaries.
- Strategic and Legal Considerations (Mayor Woodards and Others): Discussed the complexities of charter amendments required to include external ratepayers on the board. Noted that while 30% of the city's ratepayers are outside city limits, franchise agreements complicate their representation rights.
Key Outcomes
- No Vote Taken: The council did not vote to approve the stipend proposal. Instead, Councilmember Bushnell agreed to seek answers to specific questions raised during the session (e.g., whether other appointed utility boards in Washington are paid).
- Next Steps: The council will continue the conversation to determine if the proposal can be completed before the end of the year to allow stipends to begin in January. Further legal and charter analysis is required regarding external ratepayer representation.
- Administrative Actions:
- Motion carried to remove the Community Forum from the November 12th agenda; the next forum is rescheduled for December 9th.
- Cancelled study session and council meeting on November 25th in observance of Thanksgiving week.
- Rescheduled November 12th study session and council meeting to accommodate the 150th anniversary of the City of Tacoma.
- Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned after a general reminder that it was General Election Day with ballot dropoff closing at 8:00 p.m.
Meeting Transcript
I'd like to call to order the city council study session of November 4th, 2025. Clark, will you please call the role? Councilmember Bushnell Present. Deputy Mayor Daniels. Absent Councilmember Diaz. She's here. She's there. Okay. Councilmember Hines. Here. Councilmember Rumba. Councilmember Sidalgay. Here. Councilmember Scott. Here. Councilmember Walker. Here. Mayor Woodards. Here. The study session material is sent to you at 11. All right, great. We um don't have any presentation items today. We have one other item of interest. Um, and I it's around public utility board stipends. I'm gonna call on council member Bushnell to begin the presentation. Thank you, Mayor, and uh I appreciate um uh Linda uh help me work through this as well as uh folks on GPFC. Um I brought this up before uh for consideration. Thank you. Um so the public utility board fills a unique role here in the city of Tacoma and holds a tremendous responsibility. Uh the utility board holds um oversees essential services that impact nearly every household and business in the region, including the management and strategic direction of Tacoma Power, Tacoma Water, and Tacoma Rail. And it's not just within the City of Tacoma limits, but also regionally beyond the City of Tacoma limits. Um a lot of folks don't know, but our service territory, um, nearly 40% of our uh ratepayers are actually outside the city of Tacoma limits. So it's a pretty big task. Um, and the board members are tasked with making complex high stakes decisions about multi-million dollar budgets, infrastructure investments, environmental stewardship, rate structures, and long-term planning that directly affect the well-being and economic stability of not just Tacoma but our region. Um TPU does not uh just provide utilities, it is also a federally regulated balancing authority which manages the operation of our electric system within a specific geographic area, and that's a really huge responsibility. Um I really appreciate the skill, commitment, and generosity of our current board members and of the past. And at the same time, uh, because of my own experiences on the public utility board, I I want to recognize that there are barriers to equitable access uh to and representation in these roles. Um recruitment efforts to bring volunteers of different backgrounds to the public utility board have daylighted uh different barriers to volunteering. Uh people who would have been valuable qualified applicants uh have informed me and and maybe some other of my colleagues that they'd be able to take unable to take on such a time consuming role without any additional support. Um there's a lot of responsibility and extra curriculars that come with being on the utility board. Um and to ensure that the board reflects the full diversity and the lived experiences of Tacoma's ratepayers. I really think it's important that we create equitable pathways for participation uh by offering stipends that honors the seriousness of this role, reduces economic barriers to service, and helps build a more inclusive representative board that is capable of stewarding our public utilities with accountability, transparency, and fairness. There are a lot of folks out there that everyone here uh that lives within our uh Tacoma in Tacoma, but then also in our regional area that um that pay into uh our rates, uh, but is not necessarily getting um the full uh the full uh opportunity to express uh their concerns or issues with how those rates are done. Um it's a big big part of being on the utility board process is the rate making process. Um and not saying that uh our current board members and past board members they've they've all taken that uh responsibility very seriously, but I think uh there's always opportunity for improvement uh and always opportunity for different voices to be heard um and uh be represented on this body. Um so the details of my proposal uh bring forward a monthly stipend of about sixteen hundred dollars, determined by averaging comparable boards and commission stipends. The TPU public utility board's body of work is very similar to public utility utility district scope of work, and a POD member receives uh around eighteen hundred dollars per month. The anticipated cost of direct stipend would be 95,760 per year, and that's included of the entire utility board. Uh funding for this proposal would come from the TPU budget, so it's not something that comes out of the City of Tacoma's general fund. Um, and this expense is also already accounted for in TPU's current budget, so there wouldn't need to be any uh rate modifications.
openpublica.com