Tempe Board of Adjustment Meeting Summary: July 28, 2021
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Tempe Board of Adjustment Meeting – July 28, 2021
The Tempe Board of Adjustment met on July 28, 2021, at 2:00 PM to consider two agenda items: approval of minutes from the June 23, 2021 meeting and a variance request from Victorum Tattoo to reduce the separation requirement between tattoo shops from 1,320 feet to 490 feet for a location at 516 South Mill Avenue. The meeting included presentations from the applicant, city staff, public comments, and board deliberation. The variance was denied unanimously.
Consent Calendar
- Meeting Minutes (June 23, 2021): Approved 4-0. Board members Collins, Phillips, and Miller abstained due to non-attendance at the prior meeting.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Danielle Chestnut (Tempe resident): Opposed any more tattoo shops in the area, citing a surge in tattoo shops and supporting existing separation requirements.
- Sean Dodal (letter read into record): Opposed the variance, claiming the applicant tried to skirt building permits and that the site lacks running water, which is critical for bloodborne pathogen prevention. He warned that granting the variance would open floodgates for low-end shops.
- Mark Walters (owner, Living Canvas Tattoos, 28 years in Tempe): Opposed the variance, stating it would set a dangerous precedent and lead to oversaturation. He emphasized that the absence of a hand-washing sink violates bloodborne pathogen safety, as hand washing is the most important infection control technique.
- Joseph Conti (Tempe resident and business owner, 25 years): Opposed the variance, denying the applicant’s claims of “smoke and mirrors” and asserting that his own business model for a Mill Avenue shop was long-planned and unanimously approved. He argued that granting the variance would reward a lack of due diligence and oversaturate the market.
- Merrill Darcy (Riverside neighborhood resident, letter read into record): Expressed frustration with the city’s development priorities, but supported allowing successful businesses to choose their location without unnecessary prohibition.
Discussion Items
- Variance Request – Victorum Tattoo (516 South Mill Avenue):
- Applicant (Earl & Curley, represented by Mr. Jarvis): Requested a variance to reduce the required separation between tattoo shops from 1,320 feet to 490 feet. Arguing that the strict property-line measurement (1,225 feet from Colossus Tattoo) was technical; door-to-door distance exceeded 1,320 feet. The applicant claimed the other nearby shop (Inc & Eagle, 490 feet away) was a “sham” operation created by competitor Joe Conti to block competition. Presented statistics: 46% of Americans have at least one tattoo, and tattoos are mainstream. Cited special circumstances: the building is over 100 years old with limited water/restroom capacity, making it suitable for a tattoo parlor but not for other retail uses. The applicant insisted water and hand-washing facilities would be available.
- City Staff (Lee Jimenez): Recommended denial, stating the request did not meet the four variance criteria. The property has no special circumstances related to size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings—water availability is not a special circumstance because many old buildings have been retrofitted. Other properties in the same zone are subject to the same separation requirement, and granting a variance would constitute a special privilege. Staff confirmed two existing tattoo shops at 808 South Ash Avenue (Colossus Tattoo and HTC Studios) are grandfathered and located 1,225 feet away. The Inc & Eagle shop at 414 South Mill received a use permit on April 27, 2021, with a one-year validity; no lease is required for a permit.
- Board Deliberation: Board members focused on the four variance criteria. Members noted that the existence of a valid permit for Inc & Eagle at 490 feet (regardless of its operational status) meant the separation requirement could not be ignored. The 95-foot difference from the required 1,320-foot threshold was not enough to overcome the code. The board rejected arguments about the other shop being a “sham” and considered the matter not self-imposed but still lacking special circumstances tied to the property itself. The board also emphasized that decisions about water and building permits are under other authorities.
Key Outcomes
- Variance Denied: The motion to deny the variance passed 7-0 (all board members voting aye). This means the Victorum Tattoo variance request was rejected, and the separation requirement remains in effect.
- Next Meeting: Scheduled for August 25, 2021.
Meeting Transcript
All right. Well, with that, let's go ahead and mean our meeting. Welcome everyone to City of Tempe Board of Adjustment for July 28, 2021. We have a short agenda tonight, but I think it'll be a good one. First item. Well, let me take care of first things first. Let's introduce our board. We have with us tonight, board member Kevin Collins. New addition to the board, Miss Rachel Adam, uh Rachel Phillips. We have board member Ron Piggy. We have board member Robert Miller, board member Rod Jarvis, and board member Whitney Baker. Also joining us tonight. We have Mr. Steve Abramson, Mr. Ryan Levake, and we have Ms. Brittany Nelson and Mr. Greg Wolf to see us as well. The first item on our agenda is approval of meeting minutes from our June meeting. We have reviewed the meeting minutes for both study session and regular session, and have not found any edits to be made. Therefore, board may I hear a motion regarding the approval of those minutes. So moved. Okay. Do I hear a second, please? I second. All right. So motion to approve from board member Keggy and seconded by board member Baker. And let's do I'll just go down the line and get everyone's votes on this. Board member Collins, how do you vote? I abstain. I wasn't at the meeting. Okay. Um just for reference, that is the appropriate way to vote if you were not in attendance. So, board member Phillips, how do you vote? Um I I think it was sent to me. I'm unable to read it in its entirety, and I would like to be able to do that in the future so that I can have a say so, but I'll I tried to be at the meeting, so I don't know what the appropriate answer is at this point. Okay. Um I tried to feed that one to you. Um the the appropriate vote in this case would be that you abstain because you were not part of the meeting. Okay, I abstained. Thank you. Appreciate that. Thank you. All right, board member Keeg. Approved. I okay. Board Member Miller. I have staying, please. And oh, this is interesting. Board member Jarvis. I'm uh I'm not a board member.
openpublica.com