OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Tempe, Arizona/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

City of Tempe Hearing Officer Meeting – November 3, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, November 3, 2026
BodyTempe, Arizona
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, November 3, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 29:52

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:26

Good afternoon.

0:28

Today is Tuesday, November 3rd, 2026.

0:32

This is the first meeting of the month for the hearing officer.

0:35

My name's Vanessa McDonald, and I'm going to be conducting the hearing this afternoon.

0:40

I have something to read into the record, and then we can go ahead and jump right into our agenda.

Unassigned speaker

0:46

The

Speaker 1

0:46

City of Tempe Hearing Officer is authorized by Arizona revised statutes and the City of Tempe Zoning and Development Code.

0:54

The hearing officer is granted the authority to conduct public hearings to decide upon the abatement of code violations occurring on properties within the city.

1:04

These violations include deteriorated pools, structures, or landscaping, storage of junk or refuse, and storage of inoperable or unregistered vehicles.

1:15

Abatement actions are brought before the hearing officer by the city's code compliance division, typically after numerous attempts at contacting the property owner to obtain voluntary compliance with the code.

1:28

The hearing officer may issue an order directing the owner, occupant, property manager, or other responsible person to remediate a code violation, or may authorize the city to abate the property to correct the violation.

1:42

The cost of the abatement is the responsibility of the owner of the property where the violation occurs and will be collected as an assessment against the property in violation of the code.

1:54

On today's agenda, we have four items.

1:57

We have a set of minutes from October 20th, 26th, and three property abatements.

2:03

Any property owner who is aggrieved by a decision of the hearing officer may file an appeal within 14 calendar days after the hearing officer has made a decision.

2:22

Abatement appeals are heard by the Board of Adjustment, after which they may also be appealed to Maricopa County Superior Court.

2:29

A property owner has 14 days after the hearing officer's decision to either file an appeal or bring their property into code compliance.

2:38

If an appeal isn't filed or the property isn't brought into compliance within the required 14-day time frame, the property will be abated by the city.

3:02

First item on our agenda is a set of minutes from the October 20th, 2026 hearing.

3:12

Um after that hearing, and I believe that they accurately reflect what took place at that hearing.

3:17

So I'm going to go ahead and approve the minutes from October 20th, 2026.

3:26

This is a request for approval to abate public nuisance items at the Moroni property located at 1952 East Concordia Drive.

Michael Moreno · Speaker 2Inferred

4:02

My name is Michael Moreno,

Speaker 3

4:03

and I

Michael Moreno · Speaker 2Inferred

4:03

am a code compliant

Speaker 3

4:05

compliance inspector

Michael Moreno · Speaker 2Inferred

4:06

with the City of Tempe Code Compliance Division.

4:09

I am here this evening to request a 180-day open abatement for the property located at 1952 East Concorda Drive, Tempe, Arizona, 85282.

4:21

This case was initiated on February 18th of 2026 after code compliance.

4:27

Received an anonymous complaint about a deteriorated landscape, trash and debris in the front and rear of the property, and an inoperable unregistered vehicle.

4:37

On February 26th of 2026, an initial inspection was conducted and the violations were confirmed at that

Unassigned speaker

4:44

time.

Michael Moreno · Speaker 2Inferred

4:45

The first notice was mailed to the property owner, Patrick Moroni.

4:50

On March 18th of 2026, a follow-up inspection was conducted at the property.

4:55

The violations had not been corrected, and a final notice was mailed to the property owner, Patrick Moroni.

5:01

On April 2nd of 2026, another follow-up inspection was conducted at the property.

Unassigned speaker

5:07

The violations had not been corrected, and I had attempted to contact the property owner on site and by phone.

Michael Moreno · Speaker 2Inferred

5:14

On April 15th of 2026, I spoke with the property owner, Patrick Moroni, on the phone regarding the violations and granted the first extension.

5:27

On May 8th of 2026, I conducted another follow-up inspection of the property.

5:32

Progress had been made on the property, but ultimately the violations had not been corrected.

5:38

I attempted to make contact with the property owner on May 13th of 2026 on site and by phone and received no answer.

5:48

On June 17th of 2026, I conducted another follow-up inspection at the property and observed new trash and debris in the front and rear yards.

5:57

A revised final notice was mailed to the property owner, Patrick Moroni at that

Unassigned speaker

6:02

time.

Michael Moreno · Speaker 2Inferred

6:05

On July 10th of 2026, a citation was issued to the property owner, Patrick Moroni.

6:11

The fines and fees have not been paid for that citation.

6:15

On August 26th of 2026, I attempted to contact the property owner on site and by phone and received no answer.

6:24

On October 1st of 2026, the notice of intent to abate was mailed and posted to the property

Unassigned speaker

6:31

and

Michael Moreno · Speaker 2Inferred

6:31

mailed, excuse me, to the property owner, Patrick Moroni.

Unassigned speaker

6:35

I

Michael Moreno · Speaker 2Inferred

6:35

would now like to present the photos taken today of the existing violations.

Speaker 1

6:40

Thank you.

6:40

Well, over the past eight months, you've certainly made numerous attempts at trying to contact the owner.

Michael Moreno · Speaker 2Inferred

6:51

So the first photo here is on the north side of the property facing south.

6:56

This is just to kind of give us an overview.

6:59

As you can see, we have lots of overheight grass and weeds, clumps and stuff like that, all within the dirt landscape here, all on the side.

Unassigned speaker

7:08

And

Michael Moreno · Speaker 2Inferred

7:09

I know it's difficult to see, but also back on the side of the property, there is also overheight grass and weeds.

7:42

And taken from the same angle but zoomed in just a little bit.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Code Enforcement█████████████████████████████████████████████92%
Procedural████8%
Summary of Proceedings

City of Tempe Hearing Officer Meeting – November 3, 2026

The Tempe Hearing Officer, Vanessa McDonald, convened a meeting on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, to address code compliance abatement requests. After reading a statement on the hearing officer's authority and procedures, she approved the minutes from the October 20, 2026 hearing and considered three property abatement requests. No members of the public were present or provided testimony.

Minutes from October 20, 2026

  • The hearing officer stated that she believed the minutes accurately reflected the preceding hearing and approved them without discussion or objection.

Abatement Requests

1. Maroney/Moroni Property – 1952 E. Concorda Dr.

  • Inspector: Michael Moreno (City of Tempe Code Compliance) presented the request for a 180-day open abatement for violations including deteriorated landscape, junk, trash, debris, and an inoperable vehicle (vehicle not part of the abatement).
  • Timeline: Case initiated February 18, 2026; initial inspection February 26; first notice mailed March 18; multiple follow-ups, phone contacts, and extensions through July; citation issued July 10, fines unpaid; notice of intent to abate posted October 1. Photographs taken on the meeting date showed continued violations.
  • Public Comment: None (no online or in-person speakers).
  • Decision: The hearing officer approved the 180-day open abatement (case KCE 261048), citing health, safety, and aesthetic concerns.
  • Discrepancy Note: The agenda listed the property as 'MARONEY', but the transcript and inspector referred to it as the 'Moroni' property and the owner as Patrick Moroni.

2. Mackey Property – 2001 E. Orange St.

  • Inspector: Michael Moreno presented the request for a 180-day open abatement for deteriorated front and rear landscape, junk, trash, debris, and a broken window.
  • Timeline: Case initiated March 9; initial inspection March 10; first notice March 30; owner contacted but did not correct violations; multiple revised notices through June; citation issued August 5, fines unpaid; notice of intent to abate posted September 23. Photographs showed overgrown vegetation and debris throughout the property.
  • Public Comment: None.
  • Decision: The hearing officer approved the 180-day open abatement (case KCE 261450), noting the owner's lack of responsiveness and the health/safety need.

3. Stoddard Property – 2015 S. La Rosa Dr.

  • Inspector: Elijah Johnson (City of Tempe Code Compliance) presented the request for a 180-day open abatement for deteriorated landscape (overheight grass, weeds, dead vegetation) and junk/trash/debris.
  • Timeline: Case initiated February 20; initial inspection February 23; first notice sent; no owner contact; multiple inspections showing no correction; citation issued April 29; case reassigned to Inspector Johnson in September; he contacted the owner and explained the process; notice of intent to abate hand-delivered September 29. Photographs showed continued violations.
  • Public Comment: None.
  • Decision: The hearing officer approved the 180-day open abatement (case KCE 261095), based on the condition of the property and lack of owner response.

Announcements

  • The next hearing officer meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, November 17, 2026 at 5:00 PM in the Tempe City Council Chambers.

Key Outcomes

  • All three abatement requests were approved with 180-day open abatements, authorizing the City to abate the properties at the owners' expense if compliance is not achieved within 14 days.
  • The minutes from October 20, 2026 were approved.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon. Today is Tuesday, November 3rd, 2026. This is the first meeting of the month for the hearing officer. My name's Vanessa McDonald, and I'm going to be conducting the hearing this afternoon. I have something to read into the record, and then we can go ahead and jump right into our agenda. The City of Tempe Hearing Officer is authorized by Arizona revised statutes and the City of Tempe Zoning and Development Code. The hearing officer is granted the authority to conduct public hearings to decide upon the abatement of code violations occurring on properties within the city. These violations include deteriorated pools, structures, or landscaping, storage of junk or refuse, and storage of inoperable or unregistered vehicles. Abatement actions are brought before the hearing officer by the city's code compliance division, typically after numerous attempts at contacting the property owner to obtain voluntary compliance with the code. The hearing officer may issue an order directing the owner, occupant, property manager, or other responsible person to remediate a code violation, or may authorize the city to abate the property to correct the violation. The cost of the abatement is the responsibility of the owner of the property where the violation occurs and will be collected as an assessment against the property in violation of the code. On today's agenda, we have four items. We have a set of minutes from October 20th, 26th, and three property abatements. Any property owner who is aggrieved by a decision of the hearing officer may file an appeal within 14 calendar days after the hearing officer has made a decision. Abatement appeals are heard by the Board of Adjustment, after which they may also be appealed to Maricopa County Superior Court. A property owner has 14 days after the hearing officer's decision to either file an appeal or bring their property into code compliance. If an appeal isn't filed or the property isn't brought into compliance within the required 14-day time frame, the property will be abated by the city. First item on our agenda is a set of minutes from the October 20th, 2026 hearing. Um after that hearing, and I believe that they accurately reflect what took place at that hearing. So I'm going to go ahead and approve the minutes from October 20th, 2026. This is a request for approval to abate public nuisance items at the Moroni property located at 1952 East Concordia Drive. My name is Michael Moreno, and I am a code compliant compliance inspector with the City of Tempe Code Compliance Division. I am here this evening to request a 180-day open abatement for the property located at 1952 East Concorda Drive, Tempe, Arizona, 85282. This case was initiated on February 18th of 2026 after code compliance. Received an anonymous complaint about a deteriorated landscape, trash and debris in the front and rear of the property, and an inoperable unregistered vehicle. On February 26th of 2026, an initial inspection was conducted and the violations were confirmed at that time. The first notice was mailed to the property owner, Patrick Moroni. On March 18th of 2026, a follow-up inspection was conducted at the property. The violations had not been corrected, and a final notice was mailed to the property owner, Patrick Moroni. On April 2nd of 2026, another follow-up inspection was conducted at the property. The violations had not been corrected, and I had attempted to contact the property owner on site and by phone. On April 15th of 2026, I spoke with the property owner, Patrick Moroni, on the phone regarding the violations and granted the first extension. On May 8th of 2026, I conducted another follow-up inspection of the property. Progress had been made on the property, but ultimately the violations had not been corrected. I attempted to make contact with the property owner on May 13th of 2026 on site and by phone and received no answer. On June 17th of 2026, I conducted another follow-up inspection at the property and observed new trash and debris in the front and rear yards. A revised final notice was mailed to the property owner, Patrick Moroni at that time. On July 10th of 2026, a citation was issued to the property owner, Patrick Moroni. The fines and fees have not been paid for that citation. On August 26th of 2026, I attempted to contact the property owner on site and by phone and received no answer. On October 1st of 2026, the notice of intent to abate was mailed and posted to the property and mailed, excuse me, to the property owner, Patrick Moroni.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com