OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Development Review Commission Meeting - January 24, 2023

Development Review CommissionTuesday, January 24, 2023
BodyTempe, Arizona
SessionDevelopment Review Commission
DateTuesday, January 24, 2023
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:56

Good evening, everyone.

0:58

Thank you for attending the development review commission.

1:01

Um, this is our regular meeting, January 24th, 2023.

1:05

Um, I am filling in as chair of the commission tonight.

1:10

I'm Andrew Johnson.

1:11

It's my first time doing this, so please bear with me.

1:14

And I have a lot of reading to do.

1:15

So that we have a preamble.

1:17

Um the purpose of the development review commission, it was created to hold public meetings and hearings to provide analysis and recommendations to the city council regarding general land use policies and applications where the commission has recommendatory power and to render final decisions on specific on specified applications where the commission has final decision making power, including but not limited to all aspects of a proposed and future development.

1:44

The development review commission recognizes that the creation of a desirable environment throughout the city for residents, businesses, and industry is a prime requisite for the interdependence of land values, aesthetics, and good site planning by promoting harmony by promoting harmonious, safe, attractive, and compatible development that is therefore considered to be in the best interest of public health, safety, and general welfare.

2:16

Any person aggrieved by a final decision of the development review commission may file an appeal to the city council within 14 calendar days after the development review commission has rendered its decision.

2:29

Development review commission's recommendations to the city council are not final decisions.

2:53

Staff with us this evening are Jeff Tamolevich, Ryan Levake, Steve Abraham, Saparna Deskupta, Obina Kins Kingsby the third, or sorry, the second.

3:31

If you would like to um make comment.

4:43

Thank you.

4:43

Is there a second?

4:45

Second.

4:46

Seconded.

4:47

Um those in favor.

4:50

Um we have six in favor and one abstaining because he was not here for that meeting.

4:57

Motion passes.

5:00

Next next would be a vote on the consent agenda with items number three, four, and five.

5:09

Can I get a motion on that?

5:11

Mr.

5:11

Chairman, I'd move uh approval of the consent agenda items presented.

5:16

Items moved.

5:17

Is there a second?

5:20

Second, Maria Commissioner Spears.

5:22

All those in favor?

5:24

All seven commissioners are in favor of that motion.

5:28

All right.

5:29

So that takes us to item number six.

5:32

Uh Apache Central.

5:35

So thank you all for coming this evening.

5:39

Um this one will be present.

5:44

Who's presenting this one?

5:45

Um Chairman.

5:47

Um Maria Lochner from Economic Development is here and that's the first one.

5:55

Welcome.

5:55

Hi, thank you for being here.

5:58

Gotcha.

5:58

Thank you very much.

5:59

Hi, everyone.

6:00

Good evening.

6:01

Nice to see you all again.

6:02

Um, Maria Lochner, Economic Development.

6:05

Uh I'm here actually in uh in the stead of uh one of our colleagues, Josh Rutherford, who was able to make it tonight.

6:13

So we are here tonight uh to bring to you another case of uh request for upzoning of some city parcels.

6:22

Um as you might recall uh about a year ago, the city uh council approved an upzoning uh initiative through a resolution, and the goal of that was to help um spur some redevelopment in certain areas.

6:37

So far, we've used it one time, and this is our second time using it.

6:41

Today we're talking about the Apache Central um location.

6:45

I'd like to go to the map first so you can see what we're talking about.

6:48

So these three sites here, um, to the left is the Lemon Lemon Lot, then we have the Dorsey lot, which is also the parking right, and then uh the furthest east is the Apache Central uh was the former food city location.

7:02

The city owns all three of these and is looking to do an RFP in the near future.

7:07

We'd like to issue something this first quarter still, hopefully in February, uh, with the goal of bringing in a mixed use project with some affordable units.

7:17

Go back to that so you can see it.

7:19

So the total of those three lots is about eight acres, a little over eight acres.

7:24

Um as I said, we're we're looking to do the uh affordable multifamily.

7:28

We'd like to bring a grocery tenant back.

7:30

Uh as you may know, since Food City left, uh that area, all those neighborhoods are now a food desert.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning and Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████55%
Affordable Housing████████████████20%
Procedural██████████12%
Economic Development████████10%
Community Engagement██3%
Summary of Proceedings

Development Review Commission Meeting - January 24, 2023

The Development Review Commission held a regular evening meeting on January 24, 2023, to consider a consent agenda and a major upzoning request for the Apache Central site. The commission approved consent items unanimously and, after public comment and deliberation, voted 4-3 to recommend approval of the zoning changes for three city-owned parcels.

Consent Calendar

  • Item 3: Approved a Development Plan Review for a 12,000 sq ft building addition to Watermark at 430 North Scottsdale Road (applicant: ITR Investment Group).
  • Item 4: Approved a Use Permit for a 20% reduction in rear yard setback (35 ft to 28 ft) for the Keller Residence at 2029 East Caroline Lane (applicant: Dahlman Construction).
  • Item 5: Approved a Use Permit for a 20% reduction in side yard setback (7 ft to 5 ft 7 in) for the Barrett Residence at 1405 East Chilton Drive (applicant: Effie Barrett).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Written comments read into record:
    • Charles Bus (Tempe resident) urged careful consideration of density adjacent to single-family neighborhoods, especially the Food City parcel next to Tomlinson Estates Historic District, and suggested lower heights near the neighborhood and higher density along Apache Boulevard.
    • Greg Gendracina (adjacent property owner) expressed dissatisfaction, stating the city ignored concerns from a November 7, 2022 neighborhood meeting, and requested downgrading from MU-4 to MU-3 (25 du/ac) to reduce negative impacts.
    • CVAC (Citizens for White Brandon Apache Corridor) submitted a letter supporting the rezoning, citing benefits of added density to attract development, provide affordable/workforce housing, and bring a grocery store to a food desert.
  • Oral comment – Alan Flory (Tempe resident, property on Hall Street): Expressed concern about density and height adjacent to his backyard (directly abutting Food City parcel). He supported affordable housing and a grocery store but requested lower density and appropriate buffering to protect the historic neighborhood. He noted the parking lot is already 5 ft higher than adjacent yards, and additional stories would worsen privacy.

Discussion Items

  • Item 6 – Apache Central (PL220259): City staff (Maria Lochner, Economic Development) presented a request for:
    • General Plan Land Use Map amendment from "Educational" or "Residential" to "Mixed-Use" on three parcels totaling ~8 acres (Lemon Lot, Dorsey Lot, Apache Central/Food City site).
    • General Plan Density Map amendment from "Medium to High Density" (up to 25 du/ac) to "High Density" (up to 65 du/ac).
    • Zoning Map amendments to MU-4 TOD (Mixed-Use, up to 65 du/ac).
    • Staff explained the city plans to issue an RFP for mixed-use development with a minimum of 50% affordable housing and a grocery store to address the food desert. To address neighborhood concerns, the city proposed voluntary caps: density not to exceed 400 units (vs. ~520 allowed at 65 du/ac) and height not to exceed 5 stories. No specific project was attached; future site plan review (PAD/DPR) would come before the commission.
    • Commissioner Spears expressed major concerns, calling it a "blank check" and noting the city typically does RFPs before rezoning. She opposed the request.
    • Commissioner Miller shared concerns about three separate parcels and suggested treating the Lemon Lot separately for higher density while capping the other parcels near the historic district.
    • Commissioner Lloyd supported the approach, noting the city can mandate conditions in the RFP and the process provides opportunities for future scrutiny. Commissioner Cassano emphasized future review of site design.
    • Staff clarified the rezoning would sunset after two years if no development applications are filed. The city cannot sell the property without a public process.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion (by Commissioner Cassano, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd) to approve Item 6 (Apache Central rezoning) passed 4-3.
  • Next steps: The case will go to City Council for public hearings on February 16, 2023 and March 2, 2023. The RFP is expected to be issued in February 2023 with a 60-day response period.
  • Commission announcements: A clean-up event at Tempe Town Lake was noted.
  • Staff announcements: The next meeting will be February 14, 2023, with a study session on the "Minima" mixed-use project and a regular agenda including a tobacco retailer use permit and the "La Victoria Commons" affordable housing development.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening, everyone. Thank you for attending the development review commission. Um, this is our regular meeting, January 24th, 2023. Um, I am filling in as chair of the commission tonight. I'm Andrew Johnson. It's my first time doing this, so please bear with me. And I have a lot of reading to do. So that we have a preamble. Um the purpose of the development review commission, it was created to hold public meetings and hearings to provide analysis and recommendations to the city council regarding general land use policies and applications where the commission has recommendatory power and to render final decisions on specific on specified applications where the commission has final decision making power, including but not limited to all aspects of a proposed and future development. The development review commission recognizes that the creation of a desirable environment throughout the city for residents, businesses, and industry is a prime requisite for the interdependence of land values, aesthetics, and good site planning by promoting harmony by promoting harmonious, safe, attractive, and compatible development that is therefore considered to be in the best interest of public health, safety, and general welfare. Any person aggrieved by a final decision of the development review commission may file an appeal to the city council within 14 calendar days after the development review commission has rendered its decision. Development review commission's recommendations to the city council are not final decisions. Staff with us this evening are Jeff Tamolevich, Ryan Levake, Steve Abraham, Saparna Deskupta, Obina Kins Kingsby the third, or sorry, the second. If you would like to um make comment. Thank you. Is there a second? Second. Seconded. Um those in favor. Um we have six in favor and one abstaining because he was not here for that meeting. Motion passes. Next next would be a vote on the consent agenda with items number three, four, and five. Can I get a motion on that? Mr. Chairman, I'd move uh approval of the consent agenda items presented. Items moved. Is there a second? Second, Maria Commissioner Spears. All those in favor? All seven commissioners are in favor of that motion. All right. So that takes us to item number six. Uh Apache Central. So thank you all for coming this evening. Um this one will be present. Who's presenting this one? Um Chairman. Um Maria Lochner from Economic Development is here and that's the first one. Welcome. Hi, thank you for being here. Gotcha. Thank you very much. Hi, everyone. Good evening. Nice to see you all again. Um, Maria Lochner, Economic Development. Uh I'm here actually in uh in the stead of uh one of our colleagues, Josh Rutherford, who was able to make it tonight. So we are here tonight uh to bring to you another case of uh request for upzoning of some city parcels. Um as you might recall uh about a year ago, the city uh council approved an upzoning uh initiative through a resolution, and the goal of that was to help um spur some redevelopment in certain areas. So far, we've used it one time, and this is our second time using it.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com