Tempe Development Review Commission Meeting - February 14, 2023
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Tempe Development Review Commission Meeting - February 14, 2023
The Development Review Commission (DRC) met on February 14, 2023, to consider a consent agenda (minutes and street renaming), a use permit for a tobacco retailer, and a major mixed-use affordable housing development. The commission approved all items with votes, including a 5-2 approval for the tobacco retailer and a unanimous recommendation for the housing project.
Consent Calendar
- Minutes: Approved the January 10, 2023 study session and regular meeting minutes (5-0, with two abstentions from alternate commissioners not present).
- Street Renaming: Approved the renaming of West Laird Street to Romo-Jones Street, East Laird Street to Ragsdale Obregon Street, and Hudson Lane to Thomas Lane (7-0).
Public Comments & Testimony
- Item 4 (Stogies tobacco retailer): Multiple speakers opposed, including Jonathan Wren (16-year-old resident describing personal addiction), Leah McKinnon (high school principal citing proximity to school bus stops and public health data), Joe Yuhaz (Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, noting 54% of Tempe's 153 tobacco retailers had been cited for selling to minors), Brendan McKernan (neighbor), and Lucy Logan (longtime resident). Supporters were noted in written comments (14 in support, 22 in opposition).
- Item 5 (La Victoria Commons): David Sokolowski advocated for higher density near light rail to meet affordable housing needs. Sam Hanna, owner of adjacent property, expressed support but raised concerns about the transition from five-story to single-family homes and the existing sewer easement.
Discussion Items
- Item 4: Use Permit for Stogies (Tobacco Retailer) – 925 West Baseline Road. Applicant Peter Dahabra described a high-end cigar and tobacco shop with mandatory ID scanning for all purchases, no indoor smoking, and no underage sales. Staff recommended approval with conditions, including a six-month compliance review after opening. Commissioners debated the legality of tobacco sales and the applicant's strong track record of no citations in California. The motion passed 5-2, with Commissioners Lloyd and Redmond opposing.
- Item 5: La Victoria Commons – 2320 East Apache Boulevard. A proposal by COPA Health (nonprofit serving people with disabilities) and Newtown CDC for a five-story building with 104 affordable rental units (30% reserved for COPA members, 70% for general low-income households) and 19 for-sale townhomes (one- and two-story). The project required General Plan amendments (from Residential to Mixed Use, and density map changes), zoning map amendments (to MU-4 TOD PAD and R1-PAD), and a new Planned Area Development Overlay. Staff noted 24 public comments in support, one letter of concern about density and sewer lines. The commission unanimously approved the recommendation to City Council, with conditions including a two-year deadline for the development plan review and a final parking analysis.
Key Outcomes
- Stogies Use Permit: Approved 5-2 (Lloyd, Redmond opposed). Applicant must return for a compliance review six months after opening.
- La Victoria Commons: Unanimously recommended to City Council. The project will be heard at City Council on March 2 and March 16, 2023, to align with Low-Income Housing Tax Credit application deadlines.
- Commission Announcements: Staff member Siparna Dasgupta was recognized for her service on her last DRC meeting.
Meeting Transcript
Welcome everyone. Welcome to the February 14th, 2023 Development Review Commission hearing. The Development Review Commission is created to hold public meetings and hearings to provide analysis and recommendations to the City Council regarding general land use policies and applications where the commission has recommendatory power and to render final decisions on specified applications where the commission has final decision making power, including but not limited to all aspects of a proposed and future development. The development review commission recognizes that the creation of a desirable environment throughout the city for residents, businesses, and industry is a prime requisite for the interdependence of land values, aesthetics, and good site planning by promoting harmonious, safe, attractive, and compatible development that is therefore considered to be in the best interest of public health safety and general welfare. Any person aggrieved by a final decision of the development review commission may file an appeal to the city council within 14 calendar days after the development review commission has rendered its decision. Development review commission recommendations to the City Council are not final decisions. Today with us on the podium, we have alternate commissioner Rihanna Corbett and Charles Redman. Commissioners Don Cassano, Barbara Lloyd, and Linda Spears, Vice Chairman Andrew Johnson, and I'm Chairman Mike D. Domenico. With us today for uh from staff, uh joining us is City Manager Andrew Ching, uh Jeff Tamilevich, Ryan Levate, uh Separat Daskupta, Lee Jimenez, and Joanna Barry and Eddie Garcia Manning the Calm. And no Steve. Just used to having Steve over there. Uh just a reminder if you are here in public, uh, get our attention if your purpose is to actually be heard on a case. Um, if you want to speak at the podium, fill out one of these cards, get it in to us as soon as possible so that we don't miss you. Uh if you are joining us on WebEx, uh, just note that there's a chat box uh on WebEx. It's not monitored. Don't put messages in there or ask questions uh because no one's going to uh see your comments or respond back to you, and then you're gonna get frustrated and angry. And uh so that's just the chats there because that's part of the software, but uh it's not something that's used during the course of a meeting. Uh if you wish to be heard, uh you will be given uh three minutes to speak. If there's not a lot of people who are attempting to speak, I probably will be a little looser with that amount of time since we don't have a lot of people, I don't believe, tonight who wish to be heard uh live. Um, but again, respect everyone's time and get to your points and uh and make them. Uh we went in our study session through the agenda, and it is our intention. Uh we are going to uh vote on two sets of minutes from the January 10th uh study session or regular meeting, and also the street naming case, which is item number three on our agenda. Our intention is to uh vote in a singular motion uh and to pass those three items as part of what's called our consent agenda. Is anybody here uh here because they want to hear or be heard on uh those items? Seeing none, uh the consent agenda will remain as stated. Uh the other two items, items four and five will both be heard uh in that order, and everyone will get a chance to uh ask questions and be heard if you wish to. Uh saying all of that, um, I will entertain a motion for approval of the consent agenda. Commissioner Cassano. Mr. Chairman, uh, make a motion for approval of the consent agenda as presented by you. Chairman, sorry. Um you may have to take the minutes separate from the uh I will revise my motion, and I will make a motion for approval of the design review commission study session of January 10th, 2023, and the commission's regular meeting of December uh January 10th, 2023. Oh, second. It's been moved by Commissioner Cassano and seconded uh by Vice Chair Johnson for approval of the minutes, the two sets of minutes. Um, just to make note for the record, uh five of the commissioners here this evening were in attendance uh for those meetings, and they will be voting on it. Uh and alternate commissioners, Redmond. Um you were not for here, um, and Commissioner uh alternate Commissioner Corbett, so they will be abstaining from voting on the minutes. Uh all those in favor, signify by raising your hand. Opposed. Uh motion passes five to zero with two abstentions. Uh item number three, our consent agenda uh and entertain a motion. Mr. Chairman, uh I would make a motion for approval of the consent agenda. Do we have a second? A second. That's been moved by Commissioner Cassano and seconded by Vice Chair Johnson. All those in favor, raise your hand. Opposed motion carries seven to zero. Thank you very much.
openpublica.com