OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Tempe, Arizona/Development Review Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Tempe Development Review Commission Approves Use Permits October 27, 2026

Development Review Commission — Tuesday, October 27, 2026
BodyTempe, Arizona
SessionDevelopment Review Commission
DateTuesday, October 27, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 53:13

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:30

Good evening, everyone.

0:31

Welcome to the October 2027.

0:35

Sorry, October 2027, 2026 development review commission hearing.

0:41

The development review commission is created to hold public meetings and hearings to provide analysis and recommendations to the city council regarding general land use policies and applications where the commission has recommendatory power and to render final decisions on specified applications where the commission has final decision making power.

0:58

The development review commission recognizes that the creation of a desirable environment throughout the city for residents, business, and industry is a prime requisite for the interdependence of land values, aesthetics, and good site planning by promoting harmonious, safe, attractive, and compatible development that is therefore considered to be in the best interest of public health, safety, and general welfare.

1:19

Any person aggrieved by a final decision of the development review commission may file an appeal to the city council within 14 calendar days after the development review commission has rendered its decision.

1:30

Development review commission recommendations to the city council are not final decisions.

1:37

Tonight with us on the commission, to my far right, we have Commissioner Robert Miller, Commissioner Stefan Richter, Michel Charles Redman, and to my far left, Commissioner Kendon Young, Commissioner Linda Spears, and Commissioner Barbara Lloyd, and I am the Chair Andrew Johnson.

1:53

Tonight with us from staff

Unassigned speaker

1:55

from

Speaker 1

1:56

the city staff, we have Jeff Tamolevich, Ryan Levake, Michelle Dalkey, Robert Mansle, Whitney Mayfield, Warren Rivera, Joanna Barry, and Jason Wolfe.

2:08

If anyone here is from the public wishing to speak on an item tonight, um, please fill out one of the comment cards that are up here at the front and give that to Miss Barry, and you will be given up to three minutes to speak, and staff will be monitoring that

Unassigned speaker

2:22

time.

Speaker 1

2:23

Pursuant to Arizona revised statute section 9-462.04 point D.

2:31

A party who gives testimony or who submits written comments at a public hearing shall declare whether they receive compensation in any form to speak or submit written comments.

2:50

Actually, two consent agendas, which I will review in momentarily.

2:54

Um next item on our agenda is consideration of meeting minutes, items 2A and 2B, development review commission studies session and regular meeting minutes from October 13th, 2026.

3:09

Could I get a motion?

Speaker 2

3:11

Motion to approve the uh study session in regular meeting minutes.

Speaker 1

3:16

Okay, there's a motion for approval from Commissioner Richter.

3:18

Is there a second?

3:20

Seconded.

3:20

Seconded by Commissioner Young.

3:22

All those in favor, please raise your

Unassigned speaker

3:23

hand.

Speaker 1

3:24

And those pass unanimous unanimously.

3:28

Okay, so our first consent agenda.

3:35

If anyone is here wishing to speak on one of those items, please get my attention after I announce that item.

3:42

First item is item four A, request to use permit to allow a massage establishment in the CSS zoning district for Maya SPA located at 218 West Southern Avenue.

Unassigned speaker

3:51

Is

Speaker 1

3:52

anyone wishing to hear that item tonight or speak on that item?

Unassigned speaker

3:55

Okay.

Speaker 1

3:56

Next item is item 4B.

3:58

Request use permit to allow an engineered shade structure over the driveway for tailor residents located at 1224 East Late Laola Drive.

4:07

Anyone wishing to speak on that item tonight?

Speaker 3

4:10

Okay.

Speaker 1

4:12

The next item on our first consent agenda is item 4E.

4:16

Request a use permit to allow tobacco retailer in the PCC2 zoning district for next level smoke and vape located at 655 West Warner Road, suites 120 and 121.

4:28

Anyone wishing to speak on that item?

Speaker 3

4:33

Okay.

Unassigned speaker

4:34

Um

Speaker 1

4:34

next item is item 4G.

4:36

Request a use permit to allow an entertainment business or arcade in the CC the CC zoning district for level one arcade bar located at 4 East University Drive.

4:49

Anyone wishing to speak on that item?

Unassigned speaker

5:00

And the last item on our first consent agenda is item 4H, request a use permit to allow an accessory building R V garage over 15 feet in height, and a use permit standard to reduce the side yard setback from nine to eight feet for shadow residents located at 2065 East Pebble Beach Drive.

Speaker 1

5:11

Anyone wishing to speak on that item?

5:14

Are you the applicants?

Speaker 2

5:15

Yes.

Unassigned speaker

5:15

Okay.

Unassigned speaker

5:16

Okay.

Speaker 2

5:17

Okay.

Speaker 1

5:18

So the consent agenda remains, first consent agenda remains as discussed in our study session.

5:26

Could I get a motion for that item?

Speaker 2

5:28

Motion to approve the motion.

5:30

The consent agenda as stated.

Unassigned speaker

5:33

Okay.

Speaker 1

5:33

Commissioner Richter has moved for the approval of the first consent agenda.

5:38

Is there a second?

5:39

Seconded.

5:39

Seconded by Commissioner Young.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning and Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████50%
Technology and Innovation███████████████████████25%
Procedural████████9%
Environmental Protection█████5%
Public Engagement████4%
Sustainability████4%
Federal Government███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Tempe Development Review Commission Meeting – October 27, 2026

The Tempe Development Review Commission met on Tuesday, October 27, 2026, with Chair Andrew Johnson presiding, except for item 4D, when Commissioner Barbara Lloyd presided after Chair Johnson recused himself. The commission approved the October 13, 2026 meeting minutes, acted on two consent agendas, held public hearings on a wireless telecommunications facility relocation and a second-story residential addition, and set the next meeting for November 10, 2026. The transcript contains a verbal slip to 'October 2027' before settling on 2026; the agenda and supplied meeting date confirm the meeting was October 27, 2026.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the October 13, 2026 Development Review Commission study session and regular meeting minutes unanimously, on a motion by Commissioner Richter and a second by Commissioner Young.
  • Approved the first consent agenda unanimously, on a motion by Commissioner Richter and a second by Commissioner Young, covering: item 4A, Maya Spa massage establishment at 218 West Southern Avenue; item 4B, Taylor Residence engineered shade structure over the driveway at 1224 East Loyola Drive; item 4E, Next Level Smoke and Vape tobacco retailer at 655 West Warner Road, Suites 120 and 121; item 4G, Level One Arcade Bar entertainment business at 4 East University Drive; and item 4H, Shadle Residence accessory RV garage over 15 feet in height plus a side-yard setback reduction from 9 feet to 8 feet at 2065 East Pebble Beach Drive.
  • Approved the second consent agenda, item 4C, S Farmer Duplex, a use permit for two tandem parking spaces on the driveway for a new duplex at 1201 South Farmer Avenue, on a motion by Commissioner Richter and a second by Commissioner Lloyd. The vote was 6-0-1, with Commissioner Miller abstaining.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Heather Valdez, a Tempe resident in 85283, spoke in opposition to the Estrada Remodel second-story addition. She said the neighborhood has no other two-story single-family homes, and she was concerned about privacy, obstructed views, loss of the ranch-style large-lot feel, consistency with the neighborhood, possible precedent for investor-driven redevelopment, backyard privacy, and sunset views. She stated she was also speaking on behalf of several neighbors who could not attend.
  • No other members of the public submitted comments on the remaining items.

Discussion Items

  • Item 4D – Cross Cut WCF, 998 West Washington Street: The applicant, Linda Grice of Young Design Corp. on behalf of SRP, requested a use permit to replace and relocate a wireless telecommunications facility within SRP property. The existing tower is 65 feet tall and the new monopole would be 62 feet tall, with antennas bringing the total requested height to 69 feet. The new site would be set back about 250 feet from Washington Street compared with roughly 120 feet for the existing tower, making room for an SRP subdivision. The applicant stated that alternatives on other towers within about half a mile were not feasible. Staff reported no neighborhood meeting was required, no comments in opposition had been received, and the facility would be located behind walls/perimeter fencing with no change in traffic or nuisance impacts. Commissioner Young asked whether the city has criteria beyond federal requirements, noting concerns about wireless effects on pollinators, cactus, and agave; he said he would vote in favor. Commissioner Miller asked about the proposed perimeter fencing relative to the existing CMU wall. The commission approved the use permit unanimously, on a motion by Commissioner Richter and a second by Commissioner Spears.
  • Item 4F – Estrada Remodel, 6720 South Towers Street: Applicant Vito Dascoli, representing the owner, requested a use permit for a second-story addition to an existing single-family residence. The plan added a second level with bedrooms and a den, a front portico, clerestory windows, and an opaque tempered glass railing on an open second-floor deck, which the applicant said would balance the existing tall RV garage while preserving neighbor privacy. Staff planner Whitney Mayfield stated the zoning and parking are adequate for the resulting five-bedroom home, the approval criteria were met, and no neighborhood meeting was required, although one comment in opposition had been received. Staff confirmed there were no other second-story additions in the subdivision. Commissioner Miller asked about the deck orientation and possible future solar-shading effects on neighbors; staff said the criteria apply to existing conditions and any shading would likely be minimal. Commissioner Lloyd noted that no landscape plan was included. The commission approved the use permit on a motion by Commissioner Spears and a second by Commissioner Redman, with Commissioner Lloyd opposed, resulting in a 6-1 vote.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved meeting minutes for October 13, 2026 unanimously.
  • Approved five use permits on the first consent agenda unanimously.
  • Approved the S Farmer Duplex tandem parking use permit 6-0-1, with Commissioner Miller abstaining.
  • Approved the Cross Cut WCF telecommunications facility relocation unanimously.
  • Approved the Estrada Remodel second-story addition 6-1, with Commissioner Lloyd voting no.
  • No general plan amendments, zoning map amendments, planned area development overlays, or code text amendments were on the agenda.
  • The next scheduled Development Review Commission meeting is November 10, 2026; a study session is scheduled for the regular 5:30 p.m. time.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening, everyone. Welcome to the October 2027. Sorry, October 2027, 2026 development review commission hearing. The development review commission is created to hold public meetings and hearings to provide analysis and recommendations to the city council regarding general land use policies and applications where the commission has recommendatory power and to render final decisions on specified applications where the commission has final decision making power. The development review commission recognizes that the creation of a desirable environment throughout the city for residents, business, and industry is a prime requisite for the interdependence of land values, aesthetics, and good site planning by promoting harmonious, safe, attractive, and compatible development that is therefore considered to be in the best interest of public health, safety, and general welfare. Any person aggrieved by a final decision of the development review commission may file an appeal to the city council within 14 calendar days after the development review commission has rendered its decision. Development review commission recommendations to the city council are not final decisions. Tonight with us on the commission, to my far right, we have Commissioner Robert Miller, Commissioner Stefan Richter, Michel Charles Redman, and to my far left, Commissioner Kendon Young, Commissioner Linda Spears, and Commissioner Barbara Lloyd, and I am the Chair Andrew Johnson. Tonight with us from staff from the city staff, we have Jeff Tamolevich, Ryan Levake, Michelle Dalkey, Robert Mansle, Whitney Mayfield, Warren Rivera, Joanna Barry, and Jason Wolfe. If anyone here is from the public wishing to speak on an item tonight, um, please fill out one of the comment cards that are up here at the front and give that to Miss Barry, and you will be given up to three minutes to speak, and staff will be monitoring that time. Pursuant to Arizona revised statute section 9-462.04 point D. A party who gives testimony or who submits written comments at a public hearing shall declare whether they receive compensation in any form to speak or submit written comments. Actually, two consent agendas, which I will review in momentarily. Um next item on our agenda is consideration of meeting minutes, items 2A and 2B, development review commission studies session and regular meeting minutes from October 13th, 2026. Could I get a motion? Motion to approve the uh study session in regular meeting minutes. Okay, there's a motion for approval from Commissioner Richter. Is there a second? Seconded. Seconded by Commissioner Young. All those in favor, please raise your hand. And those pass unanimous unanimously. Okay, so our first consent agenda. If anyone is here wishing to speak on one of those items, please get my attention after I announce that item. First item is item four A, request to use permit to allow a massage establishment in the CSS zoning district for Maya SPA located at 218 West Southern Avenue. Is anyone wishing to hear that item tonight or speak on that item? Okay. Next item is item 4B. Request use permit to allow an engineered shade structure over the driveway for tailor residents located at 1224 East Late Laola Drive. Anyone wishing to speak on that item tonight? Okay. The next item on our first consent agenda is item 4E. Request a use permit to allow tobacco retailer in the PCC2 zoning district for next level smoke and vape located at 655 West Warner Road, suites 120 and 121. Anyone wishing to speak on that item? Okay. Um next item is item 4G. Request a use permit to allow an entertainment business or arcade in the CC the CC zoning district for level one arcade bar located at 4 East University Drive. Anyone wishing to speak on that item? And the last item on our first consent agenda is item 4H, request a use permit to allow an accessory building R V garage over 15 feet in height, and a use permit standard to reduce the side yard setback from nine to eight feet for shadow residents located at 2065 East Pebble Beach Drive. Anyone wishing to speak on that item? Are you the applicants? Yes. Okay. Okay.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com