Welcome to TMAPC meeting number 2963, Wednesday, June 17, 2026.

I call this meeting to order.

I don't have a chairperson's report.

So for a director's report, we'll recognize Susan Miller.

Hi, good afternoon.

Not much today.

Um we had um a case on the west side.

It was a landscaping business that was approved at City Council for CG.

It was at 49 West 49th in Tacoma.

Uh we had another case that Plan Commission recommended approval of that was withdrawn by the applicant before city council.

This was one out east on Admiral Place and 177th East Avenue.

The request was to IL, and um, so the applicant withdrew.

May come back at some future date.

And that's really all I have.

Thank you.

Any questions about any questions for Susan?

Thank you.

Um, we'll entertain a motion for the two minutes.

One and two.

Okay.

Okay, we have a motion by Commissioner.

Bullmash and a second by Commissioner Q.

The approval items one and two.

All those in favor?

Aye.

Abstain.

Those are approved.

Uh Ms.

Secretary, we please read our rules.

In order to conduct the public hearing in orderly manner, we ask that you abide the following rules.

Commissioner will first hear from the staff for an explanation of the application, physical facts of the property under application and the surrounding property, followed by a presentation of the staff's recommendation.

Commission will then hear for the applicant's presentation not to exceed 15 minutes.

Next, the commission will hear for any interest party or protestants.

A time limit per speaker may be imposed.

Those wishing to speak must use the sign in over to my left by the door.

For the record, please state your name and address if you choose to speak.

Finally, the commission will hear the applicant's rebuttal if any, not to exceed 10 minutes.

During the hearing, the commission may ask questions of staff, the applicant, or interested parties in the room are representing the city legal department and development services department and the Tulsa Plenty Office staff.

We do have a taping system, therefore, please direct all of your comments into the microphone.

These proceedings are broadcast live on cable channel 24.

Thank you.

Thank you, Mr.

Secretary.

Moving on to the consent agenda item.

Are there any commissioners that would like to pull the consent agenda item to the public hearing?

Entertain a motion.

Move approval.

Okay, we have a motion by Commissioner Turner Addison and a second by Commissioner Whitlock for the approval of item number three.

All those in favor?

Opposed.

And that item is approved.

Item number four public hearing.

Z seven eight six two.

Good afternoon.

Just trying to get our projector up and running.

Looks like we got one at least.

So item number four, this is a city rezoning case, Z7862, located east of the northeast corner of South Harvard Avenue and East 27th Street.

This is a continuation of a project that's happening immediately west of the subject property and was previously rezoned with the almost an identical application.

The comprehensive plan in this area has anticipated for some time that the properties on the north side of 27th Street and up against the Broken Arrow Expressway would likely become some sort of commercial or multiple use zoning category.

The project that's happening on the west side has come up with some future expansion plans that would utilize that property to the east, and so they've asked to also rezone that property from RS3 to CG.

The CG is consistent with that multiple use land use designation that exists on the property, and we had no issues with the rezoning.

We've recommended approval.

Okay, thank you, Nathan.

Any questions for Nathan?

Thanks, sir.

We don't have any speakers.

Is the applicant here?

Are you in agreement with staff recommendation?

Okay.

We are in review.

Okay, we have a motion by Commissioner Whitlock.

A second by Commissioner Shivill for the approval of item four per staff recommendation.

All those in favor?

Opposed.

And that item is approved.

Thank you.

Item number five, ZZ593.

Good afternoon.

ZC 593 is a rezoning, it's a county rezoning request from AG to RS1 for the purpose of developing a residential subdivision.

The applicant is Tanner Consulting.

The property address is 6900 block of East 116th Street North.

The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 80 acres from AG to RS1 to permit a development of a single family residential subdivision.

The applicant's conceptual development plan illustrates approximately 108 residential lots with a minimum lot width of 125 feet and minimal lot sizes of approximately one half acre.

The Tulsa County comprehensive plan designates the subject property as rural residential slash agriculture.

Staff recommends approval of CZ 593, subject to the following conditions that the development of the property shall require subdivision planning in compliance with all applicable Tulsa County subdivision and development regulations, including Tulsa County engineering review and approval.

Okay, thank you, Kendall.

Any questions for Kendall?

Thanks, sir.

Is the applicant here?

The owner is.

No, the owner is.

Are you in agreement with staff recommendation?

Okay.

We don't have any speakers for item five.

Second, okay.

We have a motion by Commissioner Whitlock and a second by Commissioner Shivill for the approval of item five per staff recommendation.

All those in favor?

Opposed.

And that item is approved.

Item six.

Item six is also related to PUD 880.

Is it okay if we take these together?

Yeah, be better.

Okay.

So CZ 594 is a county rezoning from AG to CS and a PUD for the purpose of coverage storage for boats and recreational vehicles.

The applicant for this item is Bell Land Use LLC Robert Bill.

Property location is 12330, North Yale Avenue Sperry.

The subject track consists of approximately 10.31 acres located east of U.S.

Highway 75 and west of North Yale Avenue within the North Tulsa County Highway, Highway 75 corridor planning area.

The applicant proposes development of a covered recreational vehicle and boat storage facility consisting of enclosed enclosed canopy structures designed to accommodate boats, RVs, personal watercrafts, and similar recreational vehicles.

Staff finds that the request is to be compatible that the request is compatible with the surrounding area.

Supportive supportive of the orderly development along the Highway 75 corridor and consistent with the intent of the Tulsa County comprehensive plan to accommodate appropriately designed commercial and employment and employment uses within the designated corridor area while protecting adjacent properties through the site design and development standards.

Staff recommends approval of this item.

Okay, thank you, Kindle.

Any questions for Kendall?

Thank you, sir.

Is the applicant here?

Are you in agreement with staff recommendation?

Okay, we do not have any speakers for six and seven.

We take these together, Jeff.

Yeah, okay.

So we're in review.

I'll move to approve per staff recommendation.

Okay, we have a motion by uh Commissioner Hood and a second by Commissioner Shivill for the approval of items six and seven per staff recommendation.

All those in favor?

Opposed.

And those are approved.

Items number eight and nine.

Items number eight and nine are rezoning in PUDs.

The request here is a county rezoning from AG to CG in a PUD for the purpose of a commercial center.

The applicant for this item is J.R.

Donaldson.

The property location is 2808 East 151st Street South Bixby, Oklahoma.

The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 2.847 acres of a currently vacant slash agricultural land from AG to CG to allow for development of a commercial center as well as a PUD as well as PUD 881.

Yes, the PUD would be called South County Business Park.

To establish the standards for the development, the applicant's conceptual development plan allows for retail, restaurant, office, and even mixed use type residential within the development.

The conceptual site plan submitted by the applicant shows a single detached building made of several units surrounded by parking with egress and ingress along the proposed public street that is part of the abutting in development out Alderwood estates and connects directly to East 151st Street South.

Staff recommends approval of CZ 595 from AG to CG, but only with the approval of the provisions of the PUD 881.

Happy to answer any questions.

Any questions for Kindle?

Oh yeah, Gene.

Yeah, I have some questions, so we gotta put handed to us as um email or requesting continuous for these two right now.

Speaker Gene, turn your speaker on.

Thanks, sorry.

We got handed to us today uh request for continuance for I think these two cases, and then there's an email from Bixby.

Is that Bixby email related to this case or a different one?

Um it's Bixby's, it's Bixby's response to this development from our planning office.

Okay, yes, sir.

Cool, thank you.

And then on the materials for the PUD one, um, it says I guess this is just a type of like carryover from previous one, but it says the applicant is requesting approval of PUD to permit coordinated single family residential development on approximately 97 acres.

I'm assuming that's just that's a time to stay.

Yes, I'm sorry, but okay, cool.

No worries.

Just want to make sure I wasn't missing.

Thank you.

Thanks, Kindle.

And on the request for continuance, I presume like notices were sent and posted and all that is that is correct.

And then um J.R.

Donaldson's also here.

Um he has been in contact with those neighbors who have sent in those emails.

So if you like more information, he's happy to talk about that.

Cool, thank you.

Okay.

Thanks, Kendall.

Thank you.

Zaplicant here, would you like to come up?

Mr.

Chairman and Planning Commission, my name is J.R.

Donaldson.

I live at 6730 South Birmingham here in Tulsa, and I represent the owner of this project.

Uh the owner of the project, Nick, he lives in South Tulsa, and he operates three restaurants presently in the South Tulsa area.

Uh this site is located on uh 151st Street South.

It's adjacent to uh Bixby City zone or property within the city limits of Bixby, and it's between Lewis and between Harvard.

Uh, we are in the Bixby fence line, so we've had contact with the planner at the city of Bixby, and as a result, you received an email from uh the city planner.

Uh this particular area, if you're not familiar with it on the 151st between memorial and highway 75 is exploding with housing, both in Bixby and in the county, and it's very interesting.

Right now, uh, having been in that area for over 60 years of my lifetime, that there is literally no places to have uh to buy food or professional services unless you're in memorial in Bixby or Highway 75 in Glenpool.

And so what this owner who owns this property would like to do is he would like on this 2.7 acres, which are bounded to the uh east by an a subdivision that's under construction right now, and they have in the city of Bixby, and they have a portion of theirs already zoned CG, and so I spoke with that owner.

They were thrilled with the project, and I've known that owner for many years, and we would like to do one building, and in it he wants to open up a restaurant.

That's what his business is, restaurant.

In this building, he wants to allow some 25 foot wide spaces on the end of the building.

So if there's professional service that would like to uh come in and uh be a part of this project, then that would be available.

The interesting thing why we included the residential, if you will, is recently, mean recently in the last 12 months, being in Kirkwood in Missouri and in a suburb of Kansas City, they had some similar projects with restaurant and/or professional services, and above they had what they had were you call them a townhouse, or you could have living quarters, and uh they were really nice.

And so the owner he said, Well, uh put that in, don't cut me out because I may get some interest in someone wanting to live there, and if that's the case, there would be like four residents.

They would enter from the back, but that was just as an option that he wanted to include in there.

It's our understanding right now.

If you're familiar with that area, which I know that you are, that a mile to the east, a Walmart super center is planned uh for the future.

You're also aware of what's recently transpired, and I believe uh Senator Mark Wayne Mullen even expressed that the the it's moving forward to get the bridge built between Tulsa and the south side of the river to allow more traffic to come to the south, and so with that, my owner believes this is a great time for his 2.8 acres to be moved forward with a restaurant because he believes that uh being first, and with the type of restaurants that he does, and he's got a great track record, that it'll be advantageous for this area with those many rooftops that's in that.

So, with that, he respectfully request uh this property rezoned to CG for that reason to for those uses and uh the approval of the PUD and the rezoning.

Uh I know that you've received uh today from Lindsay Perkins, who is a developer, been a long time developer.

He has property that's to the west.

I called and left word on the recorder, but I didn't get a ref uh turn phone call.

Uh the property right next to me uh is uh that owner.

I spoke with him on the phone and sent an email.

He just wanted me to keep him in the loop on everything that was done because he told me he said I plan on doing single-family residential within the next 12 to 18 months.

So he'll be bringing his property in for single family residential, and so between the uh owner to the east, which is 1540 Harvard Avenue LLC, and his, they will surround our 2.8 acres with single-family residential, and so they will wrap around it.

Uh so with that, um, be more than happy to answer any other questions.

Uh I know that Lindsay requested a continuance.

I'm asking that you consider this, and that uh we will make sure that we either get with Lindsay or Brandon uh to show them what we're doing, as it is just one building.

Uh, the city of Bixby did their one thing when I talked with them in person, not via email, is they want to make sure that we maintain the same standards with regards to the front and the sides that face the road as what they require in Bixby.

They said we don't know exactly what the county does, but we since you're in our fence line, we want you to maintain that, which means that we're gonna be masonry on both the east and west side in the front, will be masonry as well, and so uh we've done some other buildings over at Glenpool that are nice with masonry, and we believe it'll be a good fit, and we'll be there for these additional rooftops that are in that area.

Mr.

Donaldson, what were the results of your neighborhood meetings with the neighbors?

The the it was each a phone call.

So you didn't have any meetings?

I've not had a face-to-face meeting with any of them at this time.

Just telephone call.

And and but I guess the reason is, Mr.

Chairman, uh call it naive.

They're developers.

They're not individual owners.

Uh I just knowing them except for the one, just making the phone call to them to Sam Hollinger, uh, to the north 151st Street, making the phone call to uh uh Ken Laster, which I've known for 40 years.

So I was just making phone calls since I were familiar with them as opposed to trying to go to their office and sit down with them and present this PUD to them.

I so that was that's the answer to that.

Commissioner Bullmesh.

Yeah, sorry, thank you for the information.

We have an email from somebody else.

You mentioned Lindsay, but we have an email from somebody else.

He's the he should be the next the property just to the west.

Yes, Renee's somebody, I'm in a joining and concerned neighbor.

Have you had any conversation with this person who's in the letter?

Had conversation and received email from him.

He said I want he's the one that told me he was going to be bringing his property for single family residential within the next 12 to the west.

And he said that he wanted to be in the loop on everything that goes on this particular piece, whether it's what's it look like in the frontage or or just what?

And I told him I'd keep him in the loop on everything.

But he sent an email two and a half hours ago asking us to continue this matter.

Okay, I've not seen that.

So that's my concern.

All right, thank you.

Our historical practice has always been to grant a continuance to the applicant and the neighborhood, so that could happen today.

Uh, but we do have a speaker, so we can have you back up after the speaker.

All right.

And I uh have any questions for Mr.

Donaldson?

Thank you.

Okay, we'll have you back.

Uh Commissioner Perkins.

Chairman, commissioners, uh Brandon Perkins, one one one West Fifth Street.

Uh Tulsa Columbus 74103.

Um, thanks for having me up here.

Good to be back.

Um JR, how are you?

Sorry we didn't talk about this earlier and gotta kind of lay it out here in front of everybody.

But uh, so you know it does conform with the comp plan.

Um, this is a very uh uh interesting area, as you guys know 151st Street, yes, and go commercial, yes, there's a lot of high-end residential there.

My father did do uh a development that's 325 feet away from this property, and so he didn't get noticed, uh, which is unfortunately 25 feet past what notice, but you would think that since there's about 40 million dollars worth of houses going up out there, they might be notified, but and also uh uh Mr.

Donaldson said that he left a message for my father.

Well, we didn't find out about this until uh a day and a half ago when Mr.

Sereny, who's to the left west of us, uh, the west of you all, when he got a phone call from the owner's agent and said, Oh, by the way, do you know that there's a zoning case going on?

He didn't open his mail, but um and I guess that's when there was a phone call made.

But so this wasn't smoothly done months ago or whenever the planning process happened.

Uh, this is all of a sudden everybody's running around going, Oh my gosh.

So I just request that continues just so we can know what's going on.

And I know that uh you've said that maybe there's a restaurant there, and and maybe you'd be re be able to restrict that to its only restaurants or something, but I know just a broad commercial broad brush allows for a lot of things that maybe at the neighborhoods don't want.

And so are there some things that you might pull out of there, or would you agree to maybe some break requirements more than what the city does?

But those are the kind of things that we want to talk about.

Okay, any questions for Mr.

Perkins?

All right, thank you, sir.

Thank you.

Mr.

Donaldson, you want to come back up?

Um fully understanding the process.

If this uh commission uh so desires to continue this so that I can meet and talk with Brandon, I have no problem with that, and or the adjacent property owner, so that we include him in that meeting as well.

Because there's no reason for us to construct a a building on this property worth millions of dollars and have everybody upset with you before you even get it completed.

So if that's the desire of this commission for a continuance, I have no issues with it.

All right, any more questions for Mr.

Donaldson?

Uh Kim, what date would you like?

July first.

I'll make a motion.

Any other discussion before?

Okay.

I'll make a motion that we continue items eight and nine to July first.

Okay, we have a motion by Commissioner Walker, a second by Commissioner Whitlock for the continuance of items eight and nine to July first.

All those in favor?

Opposed.

And those items are continued.

Item number 10.

Item number 10 is a extension of a preliminary plat request uh for a subdivision called Fraser's edition.

Uh, this is a subdivision plat on uh almost 16 acres located at the northeast corner of West 51st Street South and the Gil Creese Expressway.

Uh the original preliminary plat for this was approved back in 2024, but there has been some ongoing issues with the property owner and with the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority and determining who manages access to the frontage road that is owned by OTA in front of this property, which has caused several delays in them being able to get their final plat recorded.

Um they've made a lot of progress on the required infrastructure and other things required to serve the subdivision, but as we continue to work through the issues with access, um, we're supportive of them getting another year extension on their preliminary plat, and so we recommend an approval of that one-year extension.

Okay, any questions for Nathan?

Yeah, do we know what the proposed use is?

Um we don't know all of it.

There were a few lots proposed as part of the subdivision.

Um lot one on the north side, I believe had existing mini storage already in place on it.

Um but there was two other lots being platted, and I I'm not sure what all the intended uses were for them, but mostly all commercial uses.

It's remaining the zoning is remaining I am I am.

Yes, okay, cool.

Thank you.

All right, thanks, Nathan.

Is the applicant here?

No, they are not.

We are in review.

I'll move to approve item number 10.

So the staff recommendation.

Second.

Okay, we have a motion by Commissioner Bullmash, a second by Commissioner Turner Addison for the approval of item number 10.

All those in favor?

Opposed, and that item is approved.

Item 11.

Item 11 is another preliminary plat extension.

This one is for Maybell Villas 2, which is located south of the southeast corner of West 81st Street, South and South Maybell Avenue.

Uh as the name indicates, this was phase two of a Maybell Villas development occurring there along Elwood.

There were some delays experienced in phase one that waterfalled into issues with phase two getting completed.

They are also continuing to make progress on all the required infrastructure as it relates to that subdivision, but they were running up against their expiration date of their preliminary plat.

So they have asked for an extension of that as well.

Um we have no objections from either TAC or otherwise to the extension, and so we recommended approval of the one year time frame.

Thank you, Nathan.

Yeah, Gene.

Yeah, Sarah means so this looks like residential, it looks like roughly 60 units that.

So this is actually it's a little deceptive if you're looking at the plat in your packet because the real subdivided lots on the south side are Maybellville is one, which is already completed.

This is the area north of that, which actually contains eight lots-ish, I think.

Those really big lots.

Yeah, the very large lots um that are done in conjunction with the first phase of Maybell Villas.

Um, but you can see that the street for Maybell Villas, the first phase was constructed along that northern property line, and I think that there were some delays in getting all of that worked out.

So that's what's led to this project getting pushed back a little bit.

But so phase two is platted as we're looking at it, those eight yards lots.

That's right.

But also residential.

Yes.

Okay, okay.

Thanks.

With the construction of 81st, it's gonna be difficult managing building as 81st is being reconstructed too.

But that and I make a motion to approve.

Okay.

Well, let me get the applicant first.

Okay.

Mike, are you in agreement?

Okay.

Right.

Do we have a second?

We have a motion by Commissioner Q, a second by Commissioner Turner Addison for the approval of item 11 per staff recommendation.

All those in favor?

Opposed.

And that item is approved.

Are there any commissioner comments?

I have comments.

Yeah, Jeannie.

I just want to thank, and I haven't done that since I've been on this board, but I've worked with Susan and her staff for years, and they do such an excellent job.

I always like to commend them.

Kim works so hard sending us all that information.

But Susan, thank you for all you and your staff do.

Second.

I'll make a motion for adjournment.

We have a motion and a second for adjournment.

All those in favor?

We are adjourned.