OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Tulsa, Oklahoma/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Tulsa Planning Commission Special Meeting – October 7, 2026

City Council — Wednesday, October 7, 2026
BodyTulsa, Oklahoma
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, October 7, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 33:49

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Unassigned speaker

0:32

Thank you.

Speaker 1

0:37

Good afternoon.

0:38

Welcome to the Tulsa Planning Commission.

0:42

Special meeting October 7th, 2026.

0:45

I call this meeting to order.

0:47

Don't have a chairperson's report or director's report.

Speaker 2

0:54

Hello.

Unassigned speaker

0:56

Um,

Speaker 2

0:57

good afternoon.

0:58

Um, since we met the last time, City Council approved both of the amendments to the um regarding neighborhood character overlays, the text to Renaissance neighborhood, and then the map amendment for Florence Park.

1:10

So those are really the only two big big things we've had at council.

1:13

So we do need to have a work session, and I misspoke at the last meeting.

1:17

I knew better, and I just said it wrong.

1:19

Um I said we were gonna have a work session before the next meeting.

1:22

That's not correct.

1:23

We were going to need one on November 4th.

1:26

Uh, there's a lot of items that we need to talk about, so we're not sure if it's gonna need to start at 10 or 10 30.

1:31

That will we'll figure that out.

1:33

Remember, um, well, Alejandro's not here, he's really the only new one.

1:36

We do serve lunch, serve you lunch so that we'll kind of have a seamless um transition into this meeting.

1:42

The topics for discussion, we've been working on some general code amendments, really some cleanup type of things, um, some amendments to our open space, uh regulations in the zoning code, uh, what we're calling housing feasibility part two.

1:55

This is a

Unassigned speaker

1:56

this

Speaker 2

1:56

was initiated by planning commission earlier this year.

1:58

It is a large batch of residential amendments to try to simplify the residential standards, so there's a lot there.

2:05

Data center zoning code amendments, um, and then there's some historic preservation related items, and we're gonna give you probably at least some concepts of what we're looking at in the subdivision and development regulation.

2:17

So there's a lot.

2:18

We'll see.

2:19

We'll see what we can cover in in a few hours.

2:22

So that's all I have.

2:26

So I'm not sure.

2:27

Either 10 or 10 30.

2:28

I there's a lot here, so I kind of like to back it up.

2:32

We may need to start at 10 if if all these items are gonna be discussed in some manner.

Speaker 1

2:37

Okay.

Speaker 2

2:49

So, in order to conduct the public hearing in an orderly manner, we ask that you abide by the following rules.

2:55

The commission will first hear from staff for an explanation of the application, the physical facts of the property under application, and the surrounding property, followed by a presentation of staff's recommendation.

3:05

The commission will then hear the applicant's presentation, not to exceed 15 minutes.

Unassigned speaker

3:10

Um

Speaker 2

3:11

next, the commission will hear from any interested parties or protestants.

3:15

A time limit uh per speaker may be imposed.

3:18

Those wishing to speak must use the sign-in sheet at the front desk uh by the doors with Aaron.

3:24

If you choose to speak, direct all comments into the microphone, state your name and address for the record.

3:30

And finally, the commission will hear the applicant's rebuttal, if any, not to exceed 10 minutes.

3:35

Um during the hearing, the commission may ask questions of staff, the applicant or interested parties.

3:40

In the room are representatives from the city's legal department, development services department, and the planning office.

3:46

And this hearing will be recorded and broadcast on cable channel 24.

3:51

Um, and just as a reminder to everyone in the room, both applicants and interested parties of zoning cases, which I guess we don't have any zoning cases on the agenda today.

Speaker 1

4:00

No,

Speaker 2

4:00

so this will not apply, so I won't go on, but that's it.

4:03

Thank you.

Speaker 1

4:04

All right, thank you, madam secretary.

4:06

Uh uh, you know, motion for items one and two.

Speaker 3

4:11

Move approval of items one and two on four amendments for the previous meetings.

Speaker 4

4:18

Second.

Speaker 1

4:19

Okay.

4:20

We have a motion by Commissioner Shivill, a second by Commissioner Cruz for the approval of items one and two.

4:27

All those in favor or uh we got a roll call.

4:30

Sorry.

Speaker 2

4:31

That's

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████25%
Community Engagement█████████████████████21%
Economic Development███████████████████19%
Urban Planning██████████10%
Zoning█████████9%
Environmental Protection█████████9%
Fiscal Sustainability████4%
Floodplain Management███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Tulsa Planning Commission Special Meeting – October 7, 2026

The Tulsa Planning Commission held a special meeting on October 7, 2026, to consider routine consent items, a public hearing on a planned unit development amendment, a preliminary plat, an economic development project plan conformance review, and comprehensive plan text amendments. All items on the agenda were approved unanimously.

Director's Report

  • The Director noted that the City Council had recently approved amendments to neighborhood character overlays for Renaissance and Florence Park. A work session was announced for November 4, 2026, to discuss code amendments, open space regulations, housing feasibility, data center zoning, historic preservation, and subdivision regulations.

Approval of Minutes

  • Items 1 & 2: Minutes from Meeting No. 1 (September 2, 2026) and Meeting No. 2 (September 16, 2026) were approved unanimously by roll call vote (Hulse, Hood, Krug, Shivel, Turner Addison, Walker all voting yes).

Consent Calendar

  • Items 3, 5, & 6 (PUD minor amendments: PUD-647-A-1, PUD-638-2, PUD-117-7) were approved together on a single motion. Item 4 (PUD-190-A-41) was pulled to the public hearing per a commissioner's request. The consent items passed unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item 4 – PUD-190-A-41 (Mitchell Park Duplex Standards): Three members of the public spoke in opposition or raised concerns:
    • Lynn Burson (5729 East 75th Place) asked about safety, community impact on park access, sight lines, pedestrian flow, security features, and emergency vehicle access.
    • John Krueger (5803 East 75th Place) expressed concern that the project would make the park entrance less park-like and that the area already has high density from nearby apartments.
    • John Wilson (7709 South Kingston Avenue, president of the Minshall Park Homeowners Association representing approx. 650 homes) questioned stormwater drainage into the park pond, the environmental impact of removing mature trees (estimated 80 trees) and compliance with a city tree replacement ordinance, ADA compliance, and the feasibility of building on a steep 45-degree embankment. He noted the wooded area had been untouched for 50 years and supported wildlife including bald eagles. Staff responded that the property is not a stormwater facility, that duplexes and detached houses are exempt from landscape standards, and that the amendment actually makes requirements stricter than the original PUD. No applicant rebuttal was given.

Discussion Items

  • Item 4 – PUD-190-A-41 (Mitchell Park Duplex Standards): Staff explained the request is to rewrite and clarify duplex building standards in a complex, often-amended PUD. The property is zoned residential duplex. The amendment standardizes lot size (6,000 sq ft per duplex unit) and setbacks. Commissioners asked no further questions. A motion to approve per staff recommendation passed unanimously.
  • Item 7 – Shadow Creek of Tulsa Preliminary Plat: Staff presented a preliminary plat for a private street subdivision on a small RS-4 zoned parcel at the southeast corner of East 101st Street South and South Florence Avenue. The subdivision will have dead-end streets. A letter of map amendment is in process to address floodplain. The plat meets development plan standards. No public speakers. Approved unanimously.
  • Item 8 – Peak of the Parkway Economic Development Project Plan: Jeff Sabin, TIF counsel for Partner Tulsa, explained tax increment financing (TIF) and the planning commission’s role in determining conformance with the comprehensive plan. Senior Planner Jeremy Baines stated the project’s objectives (housing variety, activating vacant land, commercial investment) and found it consistent with the Major Street and Highway Plan, Future Land Use Map, and comprehensive plan priorities (strategies LU 3.6, ED 1.1, ED 1.5.2). No public speakers. Approved unanimously.
  • Item 9 – CPA-134 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments: Staff (Susan) explained the amendment updates references from “TMAPC” to “Planning Commission” and adds staff as an entity that can initiate corrective amendments (alongside planning commission and council). No public speakers. Approved unanimously.

Key Outcomes

  • All items approved unanimously: Minutes, consent items (3,5,6), PUD-190-A-41 (item 4), Shadow Creek preliminary plat (item 7), Peak of the Parkway economic development project plan conformance (item 8), and comprehensive plan text amendments (item 9).
  • No deferrals or denials.
  • Next steps: The Peak of the Parkway project plan will proceed to City Council for two public hearings and final approval. The preliminary plat will go through the Infrastructure Design Process (IDP).
  • Work session scheduled: November 4, 2026, starting at either 10:00 or 10:30 a.m., to discuss pending code and policy amendments.

Meeting Transcript

Thank you. Good afternoon. Welcome to the Tulsa Planning Commission. Special meeting October 7th, 2026. I call this meeting to order. Don't have a chairperson's report or director's report. Hello. Um, good afternoon. Um, since we met the last time, City Council approved both of the amendments to the um regarding neighborhood character overlays, the text to Renaissance neighborhood, and then the map amendment for Florence Park. So those are really the only two big big things we've had at council. So we do need to have a work session, and I misspoke at the last meeting. I knew better, and I just said it wrong. Um I said we were gonna have a work session before the next meeting. That's not correct. We were going to need one on November 4th. Uh, there's a lot of items that we need to talk about, so we're not sure if it's gonna need to start at 10 or 10 30. That will we'll figure that out. Remember, um, well, Alejandro's not here, he's really the only new one. We do serve lunch, serve you lunch so that we'll kind of have a seamless um transition into this meeting. The topics for discussion, we've been working on some general code amendments, really some cleanup type of things, um, some amendments to our open space, uh regulations in the zoning code, uh, what we're calling housing feasibility part two. This is a this was initiated by planning commission earlier this year. It is a large batch of residential amendments to try to simplify the residential standards, so there's a lot there. Data center zoning code amendments, um, and then there's some historic preservation related items, and we're gonna give you probably at least some concepts of what we're looking at in the subdivision and development regulation. So there's a lot. We'll see. We'll see what we can cover in in a few hours. So that's all I have. So I'm not sure. Either 10 or 10 30. I there's a lot here, so I kind of like to back it up. We may need to start at 10 if if all these items are gonna be discussed in some manner. Okay. So, in order to conduct the public hearing in an orderly manner, we ask that you abide by the following rules. The commission will first hear from staff for an explanation of the application, the physical facts of the property under application, and the surrounding property, followed by a presentation of staff's recommendation. The commission will then hear the applicant's presentation, not to exceed 15 minutes. Um next, the commission will hear from any interested parties or protestants. A time limit uh per speaker may be imposed. Those wishing to speak must use the sign-in sheet at the front desk uh by the doors with Aaron. If you choose to speak, direct all comments into the microphone, state your name and address for the record. And finally, the commission will hear the applicant's rebuttal, if any, not to exceed 10 minutes. Um during the hearing, the commission may ask questions of staff, the applicant or interested parties. In the room are representatives from the city's legal department, development services department, and the planning office. And this hearing will be recorded and broadcast on cable channel 24. Um, and just as a reminder to everyone in the room, both applicants and interested parties of zoning cases, which I guess we don't have any zoning cases on the agenda today. No, so this will not apply, so I won't go on, but that's it.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com