OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Tuscaloosa, Alabama/City Council Meetings
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Tuscaloosa Public Projects Committee Approves Four Contract Items on October 13, 2026

City Council Meetings — Tuesday, October 13, 2026
BodyTuscaloosa, Alabama
SessionCity Council Meetings
DateTuesday, October 13, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 7:26

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

General item number one lane approval to award the rice mine road slope repair project.

Speaker 2

0:05

Yes, OCE is recommending approval for Raccoon Red Slip Repair project

Unassigned speaker

0:09

to

Speaker 2

0:09

Johnny amount of 242,317.

0:15

Bids were open last week.

0:16

We had four bids and were John Py was the little better.

Speaker 1

0:21

All right.

0:21

Any questions?

0:23

Second.

0:24

Second.

0:24

All in favor.

0:28

Jonathan Lee.

0:30

Approval of contract amendment number four with the Davis Architects.

Speaker 3

0:34

Yes, sir.

0:35

Thank you.

0:36

This is the amendment to add uh several items of additional design services for the Saving Center project.

0:45

We submitted the full proposal.

0:48

I think there's items A through R in there with additional design that we've been uh needing to work on and uh kind of look for opportunities to get this done and uh now me to go ahead and get it approved so we can release uh Davis and the design team uh to continue uh working so we can get these out uh to the contractor

Unassigned speaker

1:10

uh

Speaker 3

1:10

these changes so they can get those incorporated projects.

Speaker 1

1:14

Okay.

1:14

Any questions for Jonathan?

1:16

I'll make a motion.

1:18

Um I mean

Unassigned speaker

1:20

what

Speaker 1

1:20

what was the total contract?

Speaker 3

1:23

Davis's total contract,

Speaker 1

1:25

yes.

Speaker 3

1:26

Initially we're at I believe it's 11.4, 11.5 million.

Unassigned speaker

1:33

And

Speaker 4

1:33

then where's this?

Speaker 3

1:34

We're adding 375 in this amendment to that.

Speaker 5

1:40

Excuse me.

1:41

375,000.

1:43

Yes, sir.

1:44

Okay, but so

Speaker 3

1:46

it's 439,000 increased, but we had 63 in contingency.

1:51

Right.

1:51

So where's

Speaker 1

1:52

the 375 coming from?

Speaker 3

1:54

It's already budgeted in the overall safety center project budget.

1:58

It's in there's no finance

Unassigned speaker

2:00

um

Speaker 1

2:01

adjustments.

2:03

Yeah, it's in the overall budget.

2:06

Okay.

2:08

We're gonna have another one of these.

2:10

Maybe probably

Speaker 3

2:12

not that I'm aware of these were several that we've been looking at to see if we

Unassigned speaker

2:17

could

Speaker 3

2:17

um get get by without having to do any kind of redesign or work it out, but we've been tracking these a couple of months and

Unassigned speaker

2:26

just need to

Speaker 3

2:26

go ahead and finalize

Unassigned speaker

2:27

it and move forward with it so we can get the project finished.

Unassigned speaker

2:29

All right.

Unassigned speaker

2:30

We don't know of anything else right now.

Unassigned speaker

2:31

We can is there a

Speaker 5

2:33

construction tail

Unassigned speaker

2:34

that comes with it?

Speaker 3

2:36

There will be, but it's already it's already budgeted.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████████████████████████████████70%
Budget Equity Analysis███████████████████30%
Summary of Proceedings

Tuscaloosa Public Projects Committee Meeting – October 13, 2026

The Tuscaloosa Public Projects Committee met on October 13, 2026, and considered four infrastructure and design contract actions. Members heard staff recommendations, asked questions about contract totals and funding sources, and approved each item by voice vote. No agenda or minutes were available; this summary is based on the meeting transcript. No public speakers appeared.

Discussion Items

  • Rice Mine Road Slope Repair Project Award: OCE staff recommended awarding the Rice Mine Road slope repair project (also referred to in the transcript as the Raccoon Red Slip Repair project) to the apparent low bidder in the amount of $242,317. Bids had been opened the previous week, and the city received four bids. The committee approved the award.
  • Davis Architects Contract Amendment No. 4: Staff requested approval of a fourth amendment adding $375,000 in design services for the Safety Center project. The work includes lighting changes, modifications to the outdoor field trip/lunch court area, a bus lane adjustment to provide more bus parking in front, exhibit experience improvements, and mechanical/electrical items. Staff said the existing Davis contract was approximately $11.4 million to $11.5 million, and the additional amount was already included in the overall Safety Center project budget, with no finance adjustment required. The committee approved the amendment.
  • Turner & Townsend Operational Guidance Contract Increase: Staff requested an additional $50,000 not-to-exceed increase for Turner & Townsend's operational guidance services. Turner & Townsend has been working with Audrey and the project team for several months/years to prepare for facility operations and will continue on an hourly consultation basis. The funds are in the development budget. The committee approved the increase.
  • TTL River District Parking Design: Staff requested approval of a professional services proposal with TTL to design approximately 100 additional parking spaces in the River District under the bridges. The city already has an ALDOT agreement permitting parking under the bridges, and last year received permission to use the area for construction storage. The parking would serve the park, amphitheater, and surrounding River District area. Discussion noted that the $339,000 design amount had been budgeted in the River District Fund, and staff clarified it had not been in the RFFI fund; staff also said they paused the project until the full amount was included in the FY27 budget. Construction would be a future, separate appropriation, with an eventual cost discussed as roughly $2.8 million and a possible seven-year repayment arrangement involving the River District Fund and the general fund. The committee approved the design proposal.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved the Rice Mine Road slope repair project award for $242,317, with all in favor.
  • Approved Davis Architects contract amendment number four, adding $375,000 for Safety Center design services, with all in favor.
  • Approved the $50,000 not-to-exceed increase for Turner & Townsend operational guidance, with all in favor.
  • Approved the TTL professional services proposal for River District parking design (about 100 additional spaces), with all in favor.
  • The committee then voted to adjourn.

Meeting Transcript

General item number one lane approval to award the rice mine road slope repair project. Yes, OCE is recommending approval for Raccoon Red Slip Repair project to Johnny amount of 242,317. Bids were open last week. We had four bids and were John Py was the little better. All right. Any questions? Second. Second. All in favor. Jonathan Lee. Approval of contract amendment number four with the Davis Architects. Yes, sir. Thank you. This is the amendment to add uh several items of additional design services for the Saving Center project. We submitted the full proposal. I think there's items A through R in there with additional design that we've been uh needing to work on and uh kind of look for opportunities to get this done and uh now me to go ahead and get it approved so we can release uh Davis and the design team uh to continue uh working so we can get these out uh to the contractor uh these changes so they can get those incorporated projects. Okay. Any questions for Jonathan? I'll make a motion. Um I mean what what was the total contract? Davis's total contract, yes. Initially we're at I believe it's 11.4, 11.5 million. And then where's this? We're adding 375 in this amendment to that. Excuse me. 375,000. Yes, sir. Okay, but so it's 439,000 increased, but we had 63 in contingency. Right. So where's the 375 coming from? It's already budgeted in the overall safety center project budget. It's in there's no finance um adjustments. Yeah, it's in the overall budget. Okay. We're gonna have another one of these. Maybe probably not that I'm aware of these were several that we've been looking at to see if we could

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com