OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Tuscaloosa, Alabama/City Council Meetings
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Tuscaloosa Historic Preservation Commission Public Hearing - October 14, 2026

City Council Meetings — Wednesday, October 14, 2026
BodyTuscaloosa, Alabama
SessionCity Council Meetings
DateWednesday, October 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:44:20

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:10

Good evening, everyone.

0:12

Welcome to this month's hearing of the Tuscaloosa Historic Preservation Commission.

0:16

My name is Kathy Pagani, and I am the chair of the Commission.

0:20

Today's date is October 14th, 2026, and the time is 5 o'clock PM.

0:26

I'd like to ask my fellow commission members to introduce themselves to you, beginning on my right, please.

Speaker 2

0:34

Wayne Yarburg.

Speaker 3

0:35

David Dyeb.

0:37

Jordan Morris.

0:39

David Nelson.

0:40

Carl Ellabash.

Speaker 1

0:42

Thank you very much.

0:42

And joining us from city staff this evening, we have Mr.

0:45

Hudson Cheshire, the Associate City Attorney, Ms.

0:48

Megan Smalley, Assistant City Attorney, Mr.

0:51

Liam O'Leary, Zoning Administrator, and Ms.

0:54

Cynthia DeSantiago, the planner.

0:57

Before we hear our cases tonight, I'd like to go over the statement of purpose and the procedures for tonight's hearing.

1:03

The general purpose of the Historic Preservation Commission is that we serve to preserve and protect the buildings, sites, and structures of historic significance in Tuscaloosa's historic neighborhoods.

1:15

We are govern governed by Chapter 20, Article 2 of the Code of Tuscaloosa, which includes design guidelines that are posted on the city's website.

1:24

Our decisions are based on these design guidelines and do not consider such things as use or occupancy.

1:32

We do consider such factors as architectural style, appropriateness of materials, and how the structure relates to other structures in the immediate neighborhood in determining the appropriateness of the application.

1:46

Any approval of an application requires five affirmative votes.

1:51

If the certificate is approved, please be aware that there will be an inspection by city staff of approved applications to ensure compliance with what was approved by the commission this evening.

2:03

This is a public hearing.

2:04

It is televised live on local cable, streamlined online through Facebook, and is being recorded to be posted on the city's website.

2:12

We ask proper decorum, civility, and respect for others at all times.

2:18

Prior to this meeting, notice was sent to adjacent property owners, and the public has been notified of the applications to be presented tonight.

2:26

This hearing is a chance for the applicant to present their case, for the public to make their views known about the project, and for commission members to gather relevant facts about the application before making its decision.

2:40

City staff will begin by introducing the application.

2:44

The applicant will then have a chance to make any comments.

2:48

The commissioners will then have an opportunity to ask the applicant questions about the case.

3:03

A notarized designation of agent form should have been provided to city staff for any representatives of an application that are not the property owner or immediate family member of the owner prior to tonight's hearing.

3:16

Immediate family members, and we define that as a spouse, a parent, or a child, do not have to provide such written authorization when speaking on behalf of another immediate family member.

3:28

And we ask that you remove and dispose of signs in the yard as staff will not be out to collect them.

3:36

Commission members.

3:53

Any changes?

3:55

Do I have a second on that motion?

Speaker 4

3:58

Second.

Speaker 1

3:58

Thank you.

3:59

And we shall vote on that beginning with Dr.

4:01

Yarbrough, please.

Speaker 5

4:03

Yes.

Speaker 1

4:03

Mr.

4:04

Dyab?

Unassigned speaker

4:06

Present.

Speaker 1

4:07

Okay.

4:08

Abstain.

4:09

I vote yes, Mr.

4:10

Morris.

4:11

Yes.

4:11

Dr.

4:11

Nelson.

4:12

Mr.

4:12

Ellabash.

Speaker 6

4:13

Yes.

Speaker 1

4:14

Thank you very much.

4:15

Do I have a motion to approve said synopses?

4:19

Um motion.

Speaker 6

4:20

Seven.

Speaker 1

4:21

Do I have a second, please?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████55%
Fence Regulations██████████████████████████████37%
Procedural██3%
Signage██2%
Public Engagement██2%
Accessibility█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Tuscaloosa Historic Preservation Commission Public Hearing - October 14, 2026

The Tuscaloosa Historic Preservation Commission convened at 5:00 PM on October 14, 2026, chaired by Kathy Pagani. The commission approved synopses from previous meetings and noted a conflict of interest. Thirteen applications for Certificates of Appropriateness were considered, each involving proposed alterations or new construction in historic districts. All applications were approved unanimously, several with conditions to align with design guidelines. No public comments were offered.

Preliminary Approvals

  • Approval of Synopses: The commission approved the synopses from the prior meeting unanimously.
  • Conflict of Interest: Dr. David Nelson recused himself from HPC 5126.

Certificates of Appropriateness

  • HPC 5026 – Agdas Alford (2010 Glendale Gardens): Approved for construction of a rear porch with wood and cement materials to replace unsafe steps. (Unanimous)
  • HPC 5126 – Chandler Overcash (905 Alman Avenue): Approved for alterations to existing porches, including relocation of rear porch steps and repair of side porch railing. (Unanimous; Dr. Nelson recused)
  • HPC 5326 – Brad Johnson (1708 8th Street): Approved for replacement of windows and siding with aluminum clad wood windows and wood siding. Stipulated that a window on the east elevation be retained as a false window to preserve its original location. (Unanimous)
  • HPC 5426 – Richard Jennings (2401 Glendale Gardens): Approved for installation of a fiberglass pool with limestone pavers and stone veneer planter bed in the rear yard. (Unanimous)
  • HPC 5526 – Joe Shirley (518 19th Avenue): Approved for installation of a metal composite wall sign with gooseneck lighting for Tuscaloosa PrimeTime Men’s Clinic. (Unanimous)
  • HPC 5626 – Roger Bedford (50 Sherwood Drive): Approved for construction of a fence, following a violation. Stipulations: finish all sides of the fence, add a horizontal top member, replace proposed chain-link rear fence with wood, and grind down an existing stump. The fence height of 9 feet 8 inches was allowed due to terrain. (Unanimous)
  • HPC 5726 – Brad Allman (2507 Glendale Gardens): Approved for installation of a pool and construction of a garden shed with materials matching the main structure. Also approved a change in the front door design from a double door to a single door with sidelights. (Unanimous)
  • HPC 5826 – Thomas Cheshire (1021 Queen City Avenue): Approved for replacement of all 33 wood windows with PVC windows, matching size, location, and light pattern. (Unanimous)
  • HPC 5926 – Kelly Fitz (625 Queen City Avenue): Approved for construction of a brick wall with wrought iron fence panels and gates. Also included repair of a low retaining wall at the corner of the property. The alternative driveway gate location was accepted. (Unanimous)
  • HPC 6026 – Greg Budwine (1609 Deering Place): Approved for enclosing a garage opening with vinyl siding to match existing and a wood French door. Applicant was not present. (Unanimous)
  • HPC 6126 – Jonathan McClellan (651 20th Avenue): Approved for construction of a composite deck accessibility ramp with metal handrail. (Unanimous)
  • HPC 6226 – Heath McCullough (1311 Shady Lane): Approved for a change to a previously approved window pattern (from three-panel six-light to three-panel eight-light) on a new structure. (Unanimous)
  • HPC 6326 – Tommy Bozeman (303 Queen City Avenue): Approved for construction of a six-foot tall wooden privacy fence with stucco columns and lighting. Applicant’s request for a taller fence was declined. (Unanimous)

Key Outcomes

  • All 13 applications for Certificates of Appropriateness were approved unanimously.
  • Several approvals included conditions to conform to historic district design guidelines (e.g., preserving window openings, finishing fence outward, substituting materials).
  • City staff will perform final inspections on all approved projects.
  • The commission noted that 11 historic expedited review approvals had been processed since the previous meeting.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening, everyone. Welcome to this month's hearing of the Tuscaloosa Historic Preservation Commission. My name is Kathy Pagani, and I am the chair of the Commission. Today's date is October 14th, 2026, and the time is 5 o'clock PM. I'd like to ask my fellow commission members to introduce themselves to you, beginning on my right, please. Wayne Yarburg. David Dyeb. Jordan Morris. David Nelson. Carl Ellabash. Thank you very much. And joining us from city staff this evening, we have Mr. Hudson Cheshire, the Associate City Attorney, Ms. Megan Smalley, Assistant City Attorney, Mr. Liam O'Leary, Zoning Administrator, and Ms. Cynthia DeSantiago, the planner. Before we hear our cases tonight, I'd like to go over the statement of purpose and the procedures for tonight's hearing. The general purpose of the Historic Preservation Commission is that we serve to preserve and protect the buildings, sites, and structures of historic significance in Tuscaloosa's historic neighborhoods. We are govern governed by Chapter 20, Article 2 of the Code of Tuscaloosa, which includes design guidelines that are posted on the city's website. Our decisions are based on these design guidelines and do not consider such things as use or occupancy. We do consider such factors as architectural style, appropriateness of materials, and how the structure relates to other structures in the immediate neighborhood in determining the appropriateness of the application. Any approval of an application requires five affirmative votes. If the certificate is approved, please be aware that there will be an inspection by city staff of approved applications to ensure compliance with what was approved by the commission this evening. This is a public hearing. It is televised live on local cable, streamlined online through Facebook, and is being recorded to be posted on the city's website. We ask proper decorum, civility, and respect for others at all times. Prior to this meeting, notice was sent to adjacent property owners, and the public has been notified of the applications to be presented tonight. This hearing is a chance for the applicant to present their case, for the public to make their views known about the project, and for commission members to gather relevant facts about the application before making its decision. City staff will begin by introducing the application. The applicant will then have a chance to make any comments. The commissioners will then have an opportunity to ask the applicant questions about the case. A notarized designation of agent form should have been provided to city staff for any representatives of an application that are not the property owner or immediate family member of the owner prior to tonight's hearing. Immediate family members, and we define that as a spouse, a parent, or a child, do not have to provide such written authorization when speaking on behalf of another immediate family member. And we ask that you remove and dispose of signs in the yard as staff will not be out to collect them. Commission members. Any changes? Do I have a second on that motion? Second. Thank you. And we shall vote on that beginning with Dr. Yarbrough, please. Yes. Mr. Dyab? Present. Okay. Abstain. I vote yes, Mr. Morris. Yes.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com