OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Twin Falls, Idaho/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Twin Falls City Council Meeting - July 20, 2026: Budget Presentation and Public Comment on ICE Flights

City Council — Monday, July 20, 2026
BodyTwin Falls, Idaho
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, July 20, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:22:56

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:00

We want to follow our strategic plan.

0:03

We want to, as an organization, be an employer of choice.

0:08

We did take the 3% statutory allowed increase.

0:12

We have taken the increase assigned to a new construction value, and we're taking the city's 1% foregone balance.

0:19

This will be the last year that we can take the full 1% foregone balance.

0:23

After this, there isn't 1% left anymore.

0:26

So next year, we do this again.

0:28

We'll take all that's left and it will be less than 1%, and then it will be gone after that

Unassigned speaker

0:33

for

Speaker 1

0:33

years to come, unless we create a new foregone in future budgets by not taking the 3% statutory allowance.

0:39

And then we also wanted to minimize our utility rate increases.

0:43

So with these goals in mind, we created the budget that you're looking at tonight.

0:47

Um this is kind of a big picture of the organization or sorry, the community value.

0:58

Um you'll see here that our taxable value has grown by

Unassigned speaker

1:05

you

Speaker 1

1:05

know almost 360 million dollars.

1:08

Um that's that's a pretty good growth, right?

1:11

In taxable value.

1:12

Um I talked a little bit about the bottom of the slide already with the increases.

1:17

This one does show a 2.84% decrease.

1:21

Again, that decision is dependent on or that amount is dependent on decisions that we make as we go through this negotiation process in the coming months.

1:30

We won't do that until after this budget is adopted.

Unassigned speaker

1:33

So

Speaker 1

1:33

again, this this budget adoption shows

Unassigned speaker

1:35

the

Speaker 1

1:36

flat on the sanitation

Unassigned speaker

1:37

rate.

Speaker 1

1:38

Um this bar graph shows us how our valuation of the taxable value has grown over the last several years.

1:50

Um you can see that we're as high as we've ever been.

1:53

Uh a modest increase, a little bit better increase this past year than in prior years.

1:57

Back in 23, we had a big old jump.

1:59

Um there was a uh closing of an urban renewal area back at that point, which does a lot for us.

2:06

Uh, in fact, uh the taxable value of the city does not include the taxable value of the urban renewal areas that we have.

2:12

And if you add the two together, we're at 7.5 billion in value in our community.

2:19

Um 6.4 or 6.8 billion of that is is reflected in the city's valuation

Unassigned speaker

2:25

table.

Speaker 1

2:28

Uh that bar graph is showing you the trajectory of our uh tax rate over the last several years.

2:35

Um, you see, we're fairly consistent for the last four years.

2:39

Uh at $5.05, we're gonna round that up to $5 and $5.

2:45

Um, but we're still pretty pretty affordable tax rate that we're gonna go off of.

2:50

Obviously, you're gonna apply your tax rate to whatever your new assessed value is each year, and so individuals might not see an actual decrease.

2:57

Some might, not everyone will.

2:59

Um, but this is a pretty good rate, and it's a slight decrease from last

Unassigned speaker

3:04

year,

Speaker 1

3:05

and pretty consistent with the years or the last four or five years.

3:08

Um, okay, so let's talk about some big picture stuff.

3:12

This pie graph is talking is showing the value or or the percentage of um total budget by fund type.

3:23

Uh so you'll see the government funds is 63% of the value of the budget.

3:29

The government funds are your typical kind of what you would generally perceive as government duties like fire, police, parks and rec, whatever we do here in City Hall, that's your typical government funds.

3:39

The enterprise funds are 32% of the budget.

3:42

Enterprise funds are those things that we do where you get a fee for or you pay a fee for the service you receive.

3:48

So water, sewer, sanitation, um, getting in and out of Turkey's Lake, uh, Shoshone Falls Park, those those kinds of things are the enterprise funds.

3:56

And then the last little one, 4% of our budget is made up of other non non-major funds.

4:02

That's like impact fees, CDBG, they're not really taxes, but they're not really fees for services, and so those are the the few that make up the other funds.

4:11

Um this is the same kind of a graph, except that by not by fund type, but rather by type of expense.

4:18

So the entire 102 million dollar budget, this is how it breaks down 44% of that is personnel related expenses.

4:25

Uh 23% of that is MO maintenance operations.

4:28

That's like putting gas in your vehicles, paying the power bill, that kind of stuff.

4:32

23% of it is capital, um, building a park, buying the truck that we just talked about, you know, those kinds of things.

4:39

Uh, and a little bit of debt service, 3% of debt service.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Water And Wastewater Management██████████████████████████████30%
Economic Development█████████████13%
Engineering And Infrastructure████████████12%
Transportation Safety███████7%
Public Engagement███████7%
Immigration Policy██████6%
Strategic Planning█████5%
Budget Equity Analysis████4%
Environmental Protection████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Twin Falls City Council Meeting - July 20, 2026

The Twin Falls City Council met on July 20, 2026, at 5:00 PM at 203 Main Ave E. The meeting included unanimous approval of the consent calendar and a hazardous materials vehicle purchase, a detailed presentation of the FY 2026-2027 recommended budget focusing on Focus Areas 4, 5, and 6, and public comments regarding ICE flights at the airport and other topics. The meeting adjourned to executive session at 6:34 PM to discuss acquiring real property, ending at 6:58 PM. Council Member Grayson Stone was absent.

Consent Calendar

  • The consent calendar was approved unanimously (7-0) by motion of Council Member Reid, seconded by Council Member Pierce. Items included: approval of July 13, 2026 minutes; accounts payable July 8–15, 2026; special event permits for St. Edward's Kermes - Hispanic Food Festival, Back to School Bash, Taproot Church Twin Falls Church Picnic, Magic Valley Kid Market, and Summer Reading Finale; and acceptance of a land dedication from the Twin Falls School District.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Kurt Lindley (MD and research scientist, Magic Valley resident) expressed concern about ICE flights at the Twin Falls Airport, arguing that current ICE practices differ from past years and may involve unconstitutional detentions. He requested the city install cameras at the airport to track due process and offered to discuss further.
  • John Jacobson (Twin Falls resident) alleged that a Twin Falls Fire Department fire suppression truck was positioned to obstruct public view of ICE detainee loading at the airport. He stated the fire chief's safety explanation appeared inaccurate, as the truck was not present initially nor currently. He asked the council or fire chief for a truthful explanation.
  • Maria Hernandez (Twin Falls resident) shared a personal testimony about attending a sound bath workshop at Pop Art Studio, describing it as healing for an inner child wound. She expressed gratitude for the community and the Times News article on sound baths.
  • John Hancock (identified as John, no full name given) criticized Flock cameras as a constitutional violation, calling them a warrantless dragnet and long Terry stop. He urged the council to do better.

Discussion Items

  • Hazardous Materials Vehicle Purchase: Battalion Chief Corey Beam requested approval to sign an agreement with Rush Truck Center of Idaho, Inc. to purchase a hazardous materials vehicle using previously received state grant funds up to $324,000. No discussion ensued. The motion passed unanimously (7-0).
  • FY 2026-2027 Budget Presentation – Focus Areas 4, 5, and 6: Deputy City Manager Mitch Humble and department heads presented the City Manager's Recommended Budget for FY 2027, focusing on an accessible, environmental, and prosperous community. Key budget highlights:
    • Total budget: $102 million. Breakdown by expense: 44% personnel, 23% maintenance and operations, 23% capital, 3% debt service, and the remainder transfers.
    • Tax rate proposed at $5.05 per $1,000 assessed value, a slight decrease from the prior year. The city will take the 3% statutory increase, new construction value, and the full 1% foregone balance (noted as the last year the full 1% can be taken; future foregone will be less than 1%).
    • Utility rate increases minimized; sanitation rate proposed flat.
    • Taxable value grew by nearly $360 million; combined with urban renewal areas, total community value is $7.5 billion.
    • Ride TFT (Mandy): FY 2027 budget $1,831,053.43, transitioning from ITD CARES dollars to FTA funds (5307 and 5310). Community partnership with St. Luke's ($100,000), van wrap advertising revenue, and addition of a ninth ADA van in October. 62,815 rides provided in FY 2026 to date, 56% shared rides, revenue over $100,000.
    • ADA Transition Plan (Sam): Request to fund update of the ADA transition plan to identify barriers and prioritize improvements, strengthening grant competitiveness and supporting responsible planning.
    • Street Department (Danny): Proposed FY 2027 chip seal zone and mill-and-inlay projects, including Elm Street North and Addison Avenue to Blue Lakes Boulevard. Equipment replacement requests: sand truck ($265,000), asphalt patch truck ($265,000), and dump truck ($250,000), all approved by fleet steering committee.
    • Airport (Ken Weigel & Matt): Requests for tractor replacement, conference room furniture, restaurant grill, UTV replacement, HVAC controls, and TSA flooring; all funded through airport revenues and grants. FY 2027 FAA grants pursued for runway design and security enhancements. Air service update: 28,722 enplanements October–June, up from prior year, with growth from Breeze Airways.
    • Water Department (Austin & Rob): Projects include water main replacements (Tree Streets, Moreland, Buchanan), Blue Lakes Boulevard water study (estimated $30–50 million for future bond), generator at Well 4 ($234,000), and pressurized irrigation station upgrades. Over 55 miles of water pipe are over 100 years old; replacement rate is 1–5 miles per year.
    • Wastewater Department (Juan Puente): Requests $995,000 for mainline maintenance (sewer/water replacement in alley from Shoshone to Fairfield, CIPP lining of 24,000 linear feet completed, manhole lining), $600,000 for dewatering system belt press replacements, $160,000 for telehandler, and $67,000 for camera head, traffic control trailer, and GPS units. Odor scrub project near Rock Creek Elementary nearing completion.
    • Economic Development (Sean): No capital requests. Focus on preparing for growth, supporting existing businesses (e.g., Chobani expansion), downtown investment, air service development, event center feasibility, and community development preparedness.
  • Council Directed Capital: Mitch Humble noted four projects from previous week totaling $586,000 in requests out of $820,000 available. Council will finalize on August 10; additional ideas welcome.
  • Questions from Council: Mayor Brown asked about Downtowner/VIA name change for Ride TFT. Council Member Reid asked about chip seal zone sizes and pipe source. Council Member Vollmer asked about CIPP liner lifespan (Juan responded 20–25 years minimum). Council Member Reid also questioned a water pipe date (1944).

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Calendar: Approved unanimously (7-0).
  • Hazardous Materials Vehicle Agreement: Approved unanimously (7-0) to purchase with grant funds up to $324,000.
  • Budget Presentation: No vote taken; presentation received and noted for future adoption. Next meeting will cover Focus Areas 2 (learning community) and 3 (secure community) on July 27.
  • Executive Session: Approved unanimously (6-0, with Stone absent) to adjourn to executive session under Idaho Code § 74-206(1)(c) to acquire real property. Session convened at 6:34 PM and ended at 6:58 PM; no return to open session.
  • Public Input: No formal council action taken on public comments; staff may follow up on concerns regarding ICE flights and fire truck positioning.

Meeting Transcript

We want to follow our strategic plan. We want to, as an organization, be an employer of choice. We did take the 3% statutory allowed increase. We have taken the increase assigned to a new construction value, and we're taking the city's 1% foregone balance. This will be the last year that we can take the full 1% foregone balance. After this, there isn't 1% left anymore. So next year, we do this again. We'll take all that's left and it will be less than 1%, and then it will be gone after that for years to come, unless we create a new foregone in future budgets by not taking the 3% statutory allowance. And then we also wanted to minimize our utility rate increases. So with these goals in mind, we created the budget that you're looking at tonight. Um this is kind of a big picture of the organization or sorry, the community value. Um you'll see here that our taxable value has grown by you know almost 360 million dollars. Um that's that's a pretty good growth, right? In taxable value. Um I talked a little bit about the bottom of the slide already with the increases. This one does show a 2.84% decrease. Again, that decision is dependent on or that amount is dependent on decisions that we make as we go through this negotiation process in the coming months. We won't do that until after this budget is adopted. So again, this this budget adoption shows the flat on the sanitation rate. Um this bar graph shows us how our valuation of the taxable value has grown over the last several years. Um you can see that we're as high as we've ever been. Uh a modest increase, a little bit better increase this past year than in prior years. Back in 23, we had a big old jump. Um there was a uh closing of an urban renewal area back at that point, which does a lot for us. Uh, in fact, uh the taxable value of the city does not include the taxable value of the urban renewal areas that we have. And if you add the two together, we're at 7.5 billion in value in our community. Um 6.4 or 6.8 billion of that is is reflected in the city's valuation table. Uh that bar graph is showing you the trajectory of our uh tax rate over the last several years. Um, you see, we're fairly consistent for the last four years. Uh at $5.05, we're gonna round that up to $5 and $5. Um, but we're still pretty pretty affordable tax rate that we're gonna go off of. Obviously, you're gonna apply your tax rate to whatever your new assessed value is each year, and so individuals might not see an actual decrease. Some might, not everyone will. Um, but this is a pretty good rate, and it's a slight decrease from last year, and pretty consistent with the years or the last four or five years. Um, okay, so let's talk about some big picture stuff. This pie graph is talking is showing the value or or the percentage of um total budget by fund type. Uh so you'll see the government funds is 63% of the value of the budget. The government funds are your typical kind of what you would generally perceive as government duties like fire, police, parks and rec, whatever we do here in City Hall, that's your typical government funds. The enterprise funds are 32% of the budget.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com