The Valdez City Council met on February 17, 2026 at 7:00 PM. The meeting included unanimous approval of the consent agenda and new business, followed by reports from the city manager, clerk, attorney, mayor, and council members. The meeting concluded with an executive session to discuss litigation strategy regarding Trans-Alaska Pipeline System ad valorem tax issues and escape property matters.
Let's see everybody online here. Olivia and Jimmy online. Jimmy. Yes, ma'am. Okay. All right. Um, okay, Mr. Mayor. Um, all council members are present this evening. Okay, please stand with me for the Pledge of Allegiance. All right. And to the Republic for which one nation under God. Indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Okay. Roll call. We did um public business from the floor. Any public business from the floor. Okay, seeing none, we will go to the uh consent agenda. We have two items on the consent agenda. Approval to go into executive session, discussion of implications of city revenue and litigation strategy regarding Trans-Alaska Pipeline System Ad Valorum tax issues. Number two is approval of senior center hardship property tax exemption for Barbara Ezel. Move to approve the consent agenda. Second, and moved by Councilmember Lally. Uh second by council member Whitty to approve all items on the consent agenda. Ready for the vote. Um all those in favor, please say aye. Aye. Aye. All those opposed. We have seven yes. Motion carries. Okay, moving on to new business. We have approval of the 2026 community purpose property tax exemption applications. Move to approve. Move to a second. Then move by council member Love, second by Councilmember Foster to approve the 2026 community purpose property tax exemption applications. Do we have any comments on that? Go ahead. Just a couple questions. Just curious about in general. Were all these properties also do they receive the exemption last year? Are there any new properties on the list? Through the mayor, council member love. These are all properties that have received the exemption in the past. Okay. And then I just saw in on that table that uh KCG property with just 64% of the area exempt. Is that the same as last year too? Was that highlighting the table just because it's not a high? They re-measured the proportions. So that is different from last year.