The Ports and Harbor Commission held its rescheduled regular meeting on Monday, August 31, 2026, at 6:30 PM in the Council Chambers. All commissioners were present except Commissioners Kelly and Steed. No non-agenda public business was brought forward. The commission reordered the agenda so the harbor rate schedule could be heard first, approved an amended rate schedule for forwarding to the City Council, discussed Kelsey Dock mooring recovery and long-term improvements, and reviewed the 2026 Prince William Sound pink salmon disaster.
So call the um oh what is today August 31st meeting of Ports and Harbors Commission to um to order um and roll call all commissioners are present except for Commissioner Kelly and Commissioner Steed. And I believe they're both absent excuse because they received notification. Um is there any public business from the floor on a non-agenda item? So anything that's not on the agenda to bring forward. Okay. Um it is the suggestion has been made that since we have some public members here that might want to hear the right discussion that we move that forward on the agenda. Are there any commissioners that have a problem with that? Okay. So we're gonna move um item number three to item number one, bump it to the start of new business, which is recommendation to repeal resolution resolution 2629 naming rates and fees for use of facilities in the Valdece Harbor and replaced with Valdece Harbor full legal rate schedule. Um is there a motion to approve? So move. Is there a second? Yeah, I'll say all right. So it's moved and seconded, and um first we'll open it up for discussion from the commission, and then we'll move to the public if there's any comments you guys want to make. So um commission comments or staff comments as we start the discussion. Yeah, anything from Sarah Essentially the changes that we were made. The changes that were made in this, uh, besides the the layout were primarily what was taken away from the previous meeting. Um with the customer um user uh feedback. So primarily getting rid of the parking, getting rid of the same skiff charges, um, and then just doing some additional minor tweaks here and there, but nothing else that really affected the rates besides those two question from commissions. Uh yeah, just uh a couple of comments, I guess, for most things. So I uh so I appreciate the uh reconsideration on the um anchorage CPI plus one percent going to the flat rate at two percent. Is that that's what I understand it to be now, just a flat rate after this last five percent rate cycle, right? So going into 2028. Uh you know, looking at that uh anchorage CPI, it's been anything from zero to eight eight. That'd be quite a we'd fill this room, I'm sure, with an eight or nine percent harbor rate increase if we were to follow that. So I also support the uh removal of the Saints gifts. Um back to my time on council and on this commission. Uh we've always uh allowed them uh to be able to uh consider their vessel as basically paid for with their commercial uh mortgage agreement. I did have a couple of questions. Um I guess uh I'd like to know why we're coming up with a 25% uh move list fee, 20 25 dollar fee for the the move list. Um so not necessarily to be with industry standard, but a couple other harbors are charging for it. It does take quite a bit of time to manage that uh because ultimately it affects hey, you try and you know, contact the person first to say, hey, you're your this slip is available. Are you interested in wanting to make the switch or not? And now you're waiting on them to get back to you if you don't reach them right away. And so that holds up me reassigning stuff off of the wait list. So we put the fee in place. I you guys direct us, we can take it out if you'd like. I'm that's it's all based on what the commission recommends. Um what's the total? How many times do you do that a year? Uh probably about a dozen. Right now we've only had two new move list requests that have come in since the fee was in place. But I again I so you guys direct me. Yes, yes, sir. So uh, you know, that I guess that was my question is is this you know something that's chronic, or you know, I mean it's we're talking you know, 50 50 moves a summer or a year. Um I don't know. I just I kind of feel like that's part of the administrative costs of managing the harbor is moving people and accommodating requests. So I wouldn't be in support of that. Um so just can you give me a little bit of backstory on what the what the issue is in the harbor. So that primarily was put in place because we do not have a fuel flowage fee for the docks, right?