The Historic and Architectural Preservation Board (HAPB) met in the Venice City Hall Council Chambers at 9:00 a.m. on Thursday, March 12, 2026. The board approved the prior month's minutes, acted on two Certificate of Architectural Compliance (CAC) applications, set direction for the Local Register Forum, and selected a historic-resources survey project for the next state small matching grant cycle.
Note: The raw transcript contains minor application-number variants, but this summary uses the printed agenda numbers PLAR26-0001 and PLAR26-0002.
Good morning, everyone. I'd like to call the meeting to order. Could we have roll call, please? Chair BB. Ms. Trammel. Present. Ms. Moore. Present. Mr. Stecketty. Here. Mr. Watkins. Mr. Green. Here. And Mr. Barrick. Here. Okay. Everyone received the minutes of February the twelfth. Does anyone have any corrections or clarifications for the minutes? Motion to approve. Thank you. We have a motion and a second. All in favor say aye. Anyone disapprove, say nay. Thank you. Minutes are approved. Uh do we have any general audience participation today? No, not for general. Okay, thank you. Uh in which case we will reconvene the public hearing that was continued from February the twelfth. Uh we're seeking a certificate of architectural compliance for a new carport in the historic Venice Architectural Control District. Uh PLAR 26-010-326 Pedro Street. This is a quasi-judicial hearing. Um this is to certify that the public hearing for this petition was appropriately advertised on January 24th, 2026, as required by the City of Venice land development code. The proof of publication is on file in the planning and zoning office. Yes, I do have the speaker cards. Thank you. Uh Mr. Attorney. Yes. Again, uh, since the last hearing, has anyone on this board received any ex parte communication regarding this application? No. Please let the record reflect that there the the whole board has indicated in no ex part to communication. And since the last hearing, has there been any uh conflicts of interest that we would require you to abstain from this hearing that has come to that has arisen? No.