The Historic and Architectural Preservation Board (HAPB) met on Thursday, June 11, 2026, at 9:00 AM in the City Council Chambers. The board approved minutes from the previous meeting with a correction, received a comprehensive presentation on the Edgewood and Seaboard Historic Resources Survey, and discussed potential revisions to facade color regulations. No public comments were made.
All right, thank you. All right, we'll call to order uh the June 11th, 2026 meeting of the Historic Architectural and Preservation Board. And uh can we have a roll call attendance? Yes, Chair, one moment. Chair Beebe. Here. Ms. Trammell, present. Ms. Moore. Present. Mr. Watkins. Further. Mr. Green. Here. Mr. Barrick? Here. And Mr. Stecketty. Wow. Full board today. All right. Uh have before you the minutes of the Thursday, May 14th meeting, or last meeting. Is there any comments or revisions on that? I do have one. Anyone has on the on the minutes of Thursday, May 14th. Um regarding first application at 417 Nassau Street for the alternative for the fence height exceeding six feet. And that is uh Mr. Hardy clarified that the application did not request a fence height of six foot eight inches as indicated by staff, but rather a height of six foot as shown on the application site plan drawing. Does anyone have any comments on adding that? That was the early clarification during the presentation, and it was clear that it was just inaccurately stated. Mr. Hardy clarified that. And down below on this on these minutes, um it's also says planner Smith stated the application material would need to be amended to reflect the six-foot fencing, which I believe we could strike if that's the case. So does anyone have any comments on that? I agree with the change. Okay. All right. Um you need a motion or still need a motion to separate the recommendations. I have language. Uh if someone wants to read it, or can I make the motion? All right, I'll I move that we we add the sentence after the second paragraph to state Mr. Hardy clarified that the application did not request a a fence height of six foot eight as indicated by staff, but rather a height of six foot as shown on the application site plan drawings. And further that we strike uh the requirement for application materials to be amended for the six-foot fencing. I'll second that motion. Gene seconds it all in favor. Aye.