OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Virginia Beach Planning Commission Meeting - July 9, 2026

Planning Commission MeetingsThursday, July 9, 2026
BodyVirginia Beach, Virginia
SessionPlanning Commission Meetings
DateThursday, July 9, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:08

Good morning, everyone.

0:10

Thank you.

0:11

Good morning.

0:12

Good morning.

0:13

And thank you, Planning Commissioners and City Staff for your participation today.

0:17

My name is John Carlson.

0:19

I'm the chair of the Genia Beach Planning Commission.

0:22

Welcome to the July 8th informal session of the Gene Beach Planning Commission.

0:27

Call this meeting to hold.

0:37

For today's meeting.

0:39

Just two quick things before we jump into the agenda.

0:42

One, Chair Costan is going to make an announcement at the start of formal, but just for awareness, the closed captioning system is not working in council chambers.

0:51

So there will be an announcement for the public if anyone needs some sort of combination for that.

0:57

The other quick thing, just for awareness upcoming on your August agenda, we will have the text amendment proposal for data center.

1:04

So that is forthcoming.

1:06

And that's all I have.

1:09

Sure.

1:27

Good morning, um, Hannah Sabo Zodia Administrator.

1:31

I am here to talking about the first two items, items one and two are both relating to the city's ordering zoning ordinance pertaining to short-term rentals.

1:41

Um the planning commission was briefed on these during the last meeting.

1:45

Um the items one and two both are looking at a change to the overlay within the oceanfront resort district, the specific overlay being the short-term rental overlay.

1:56

Um, during the April 21st, 2026 meeting, City Council referred a resolution that was sponsored by Vice Mayor Wilson and then Council members Remick Shulman and Henley directing the planning commission to review review a revision to the oceanfront resort STR overlay district.

2:11

And that was due to the proliferation of STRs at the ocean front and then the detrimental impact to the neighborhood from parking and then loss of housing stock.

2:19

Uh the overlay boundary is proposed to be reduced in area.

2:23

And at yesterday's city council meeting, they did approve an extension for 60 days for that resolution.

2:29

So just to be aware of that for this planning commission, you don't have that um deadline of today any any longer.

2:36

Um within the existing overlay, there's a hundred there's 331 permitted STRs, and the proposed overlay um would contain 281 STRs that are currently permitted.

2:48

And uh so those existing STRs that are outside of the newly proposed overlay, but within the existing overlay, would be considered grandfathered, and they would be allowed to continue to operate so long as they don't stop operation for a period of two years or longer.

3:02

Um we have done a lot of outreach uh for this update.

3:05

We have gone to the old beach design review committee, the Bayfront Advisory Commission, uh the Resort Advisory Commission's Transportation Parking Pedestrian Committee, and the Resort Advisory Commission's Planning Design Review Committee.

3:17

The Hampton Roads Realtors Association was also briefed.

3:20

Um we of course briefed this group at the last meeting, and letters were sent out to all of the um properties within the boundary that would be affected.

3:29

Um through that outreach, we've gotten a lot of neutral feedback, just like questions about what would happen uh to those existing short-term rentals.

3:37

Um we explained the grant bothered process, and uh we did get two letters in opposition that were included in the supplements, uh, the last supplement that went out.

3:45

We've received about 17 calls.

3:47

Um again, those were mostly asking questions, and and then I would say generally neutral um on the change.

3:55

Um, if there are any questions on that item.

3:58

And so I'll just oh, sorry, go ahead.

4:03

Well, I'm not sure I have a specific question.

4:06

What I'm really wanting to say is this what's in front of everybody today, is an alternate map.

4:12

Had work with my councilman with regards to public input, and it was looked at to be to be too great a reduction in the vibe area.

4:26

So, unlike the previous map, this now extends permitted STRs up to 18th Street before it's been pulled back.

4:36

Um so this is an alternate map that's in front of you from the one that was here a month or two before.

4:42

I think because of that, we probably want to take the time we've been given and not vote on it now, so you all have a chance to see it and and talk about it.

4:51

However, I will say that the time we gave this has given a lot of people the opportunity to ask questions, find out what's it's going to mean to them.

5:01

I I will say this, so it doesn't really come out clearly in the regs.

5:06

Abandonment you know of a non-conforming use, which is what it would be, uh is an enforcement issue.

5:17

It becomes very difficult at times to understand abandonment, uh, particularly for an STR.

5:23

So the likelihood of abandonment, I'm not sure is that great.

5:26

However, what it does do, and I'm not sure everybody understands this within the district.

5:32

If you have a non-conforming use and you wanted to modify it anyway, you would have to come back before council to do that.

5:38

So if you wanted to add a bedroom, if you wanted to add a dwelling, something you'd have to come back.

5:43

I think you have to do that now under the conditional use requirement.

5:46

The city would take that view anyway.

5:48

So I'm not sure it impacts negatively people with current STRs.

5:55

The big reduction area that you're looking at is primarily in my view to accommodate future growth that we've been planning for in the central beach district.

6:05

And I've you've heard me complain about STRs quite a bit here.

6:10

Um, and I would like to see that pulled back in that area that we're not promoting STRs in this new growth area, that that be for housing, um, for folks to come in, and we have housing stock there.

6:25

That that is the idea for the reduction.

6:27

So may I just want to clarify there they won't actually become non-conforming uses?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████37%
Transportation Safety█████████████13%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████████10%
Procedural████████8%
Affordable Housing██████6%
Community Engagement█████5%
Short-Term Rentals████4%
Water And Wastewater Management███3%
Public Engagement██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Virginia Beach Planning Commission Meeting - July 9, 2026

The Virginia Beach Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 9, 2026, to consider a range of land use applications, including short-term rental regulations, mixed-use developments, and conditional use permits. The meeting included a formal session following an informal discussion. The commission deferred several items, approved a consent agenda of nine items, and voted on 11 regular agenda items, with most receiving approval. Key themes included addressing housing needs, balancing development with community concerns, and refining zoning ordinances.

Consent Calendar

  • Minutes: Approved minutes from the June 2, 2026, informal and formal hearings (11-0, with Commissioner Camp abstaining on item 14).
  • Item 11 (Change in Nonconformity): Approved a 2,400-square-foot storage garage at 1330 Creedle Road.
  • Item 12 (Conditional Rezoning): Approved rezoning of Pungo Square Shopping Center from B1/AG2 to conditional B2, with proffers limiting uses.
  • Item 13 (Conditional Rezoning): Approved rezoning of 21,000 sq ft at Norfolk Avenue and Cyprus Avenue from I1 to conditional RT3 for retail/commercial.
  • Item 14 (Child Daycare): Approved a conditional use permit for a 57-child daycare at Memorial Methodist Church, 804 Gammon Road (Commissioner Camp abstained).
  • Item 17 (Indoor Recreation): Approved a conditional use permit for a gymnastics/tumbling gym expansion to 10,000 sq ft at 209 First Colonial Road.
  • Item 20 (Wildlife Rehabilitation): Approved a home-based wildlife rehabilitation center for small mammals at 4317 Ben Gun Road.
  • Item 22 (STR CUP): Approved a short-term rental conditional use permit at 913 Pacific Avenue Unit B.
  • Item 23 (STR CUP): Approved a short-term rental conditional use permit at 304 28th Street Unit 209.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Items 6&7 (BH Farmhouse LLC): Seven speakers testified. Supporters included a resident of Lake Christopher, the CEO of CHIP of Southampton Roads, and a military spouse who praised the developer's community engagement and affordable housing component. Opponents, including representatives from the Charlestown Area Civic League and residents of Dillon Drive, raised concerns about traffic congestion, school overcrowding, environmental impact, privacy, and stormwater management. A petition with 6,556 signatures was cited. The developer committed to further traffic studies and potential pedestrian safety improvements.
  • Items 9&10 (33rd Street LLC): Four speakers testified. A resident of 33rd 1/2 Street supported the project but requested a pedestrian crosswalk on Pacific Avenue. Another resident of 33rd 1/2 Street emphasized safety concerns at Pacific Avenue crossings. A property owner on 34th Street requested a sidewalk connecting the alley to 34th Street and expressed concerns about pile driving noise and damage. A condo owner reiterated the need for a sidewalk and safe crossing. The developer offered to work on pedestrian access to 33rd Street and participate in cost-sharing for a potential HAWK signal.
  • Item 8 (Street Closure): One speaker, Lisa Bertini, opposed the closure of a portion of Holly Road, expressing concern about tree removal and wildlife habitat. The applicant clarified no trees would be removed.

Discussion Items

  • Items 1 & 2 (STR Overlay Revision): Deferred for 30 days due to a revised map and ongoing public outreach. The proposed overlay boundary reduction would grandfather existing STRs. The commission discussed the difference between grandfathered and non-conforming uses.
  • Item 3 (STR Parking Requirements): Approved an ordinance to prohibit STRs from using city-owned parking garages to meet parking requirements. The amendment applies only to public garages, not lots. Staff reported general support from advisory committees.
  • Item 4 (Mini Warehouse – First Floor Storage): Approved an ordinance amendment to clarify that storage units are allowed on the ground floor of mixed-use buildings in B4C districts, provided they are not visible or directly accessible from the exterior. The vote was 8-3, with some commissioners concerned about consistency with the newly adopted comprehensive plan.
  • Item 5 (Subdivision Variance): Deferred for 30 days at the applicant's request to continue stakeholder discussions.
  • Items 6&7 (BH Farmhouse LLC): Approved a conditional rezoning from B2 to conditional B4 and a subdivision variance for a 251-unit multifamily development at 1805 Kempsville Road. The project includes preservation of a historic farmhouse, 18 affordable units (7% at 100% AMI for 10 years), and site improvements. The developer committed to traffic studies for a potential crosswalk and pedestrian safety. The vote passed (no tally given, but noted as approved).
  • Item 8 (Street Closure – Bay Colony Drive): Approved a street closure for a portion of an unimproved lane and Holly Road right-of-way, subject to conditions including a public utility easement. The vote was 11-0.
  • Items 9&10 (33rd Street LLC): Approved a street closure of the eastern portion of 33rd 1/2 Street and a modification of conditions to allow a 7-story, 85-foot-tall senior living facility (130 independent living units, 10 affordable) instead of a previously approved 12-story, 158.5-foot building. The developer agreed to work on pedestrian access and cost-sharing for infrastructure improvements. The vote passed (no tally given, but noted as approved).
  • Item 15 (Bulk Storage Yard – 232 Jersey Avenue): Approved a conditional use permit for a bulk storage yard with a four-year term, later amended to five years on a substitute motion. The vote was 9-2. The commission debated the length of interim use given the Pembroke SGA redevelopment timeline.
  • Item 16 (City View 2 LLC): Approved a conditional use permit for a mini warehouse and office building at 5411-5431 Virginia Beach Boulevard. The building includes 18,525 sq ft of office space (corporate headquarters) and climate-controlled self-storage, with convertible floors. The vote passed (no tally given, but noted as approved).
  • Items 18&19 (1036 FP Road LLC): Approved a conditional use permit for a mini warehouse (23,500 sq ft) and a bulk storage yard (side only, not front) at 1036 Ferry Plantation Road. The applicant agreed to remove front storage and add landscaping. The vote passed (no tally given, but noted as approved).
  • Item 21 (Sports Center Signage): Approved a major entertainment venue signage package for the Virginia Beach Sports Center, including monument, pylon, and banner signs. The item was originally on consent but pulled for a speaker who left; passed without opposition.

Key Outcomes

  • Deferrals: Items 1, 2, 5, site visit minutes (July 2, 2026), and the 2025-2026 annual report were deferred 30 days to the August meeting.
  • Consent Agenda: Approved 11-0 (with one abstention).
  • Regular Agenda: All 11 items were approved, with item 4 passing 8-3 and item 15 passing 9-2 after a substitute motion. Other votes were unanimous or not recorded with dissent.
  • Directives: Staff was directed to work with applicants on pedestrian safety studies, sidewalk connectivity, and tree preservation. The annual report will be updated with additional goals, including housing stock review and tree canopy assessment.
  • Next Steps: Approved applications will go to City Council for final decisions. The commission will continue discussions on the STR overlay and zoning ordinance updates.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning, everyone. Thank you. Good morning. Good morning. And thank you, Planning Commissioners and City Staff for your participation today. My name is John Carlson. I'm the chair of the Genia Beach Planning Commission. Welcome to the July 8th informal session of the Gene Beach Planning Commission. Call this meeting to hold. For today's meeting. Just two quick things before we jump into the agenda. One, Chair Costan is going to make an announcement at the start of formal, but just for awareness, the closed captioning system is not working in council chambers. So there will be an announcement for the public if anyone needs some sort of combination for that. The other quick thing, just for awareness upcoming on your August agenda, we will have the text amendment proposal for data center. So that is forthcoming. And that's all I have. Sure. Good morning, um, Hannah Sabo Zodia Administrator. I am here to talking about the first two items, items one and two are both relating to the city's ordering zoning ordinance pertaining to short-term rentals. Um the planning commission was briefed on these during the last meeting. Um the items one and two both are looking at a change to the overlay within the oceanfront resort district, the specific overlay being the short-term rental overlay. Um, during the April 21st, 2026 meeting, City Council referred a resolution that was sponsored by Vice Mayor Wilson and then Council members Remick Shulman and Henley directing the planning commission to review review a revision to the oceanfront resort STR overlay district. And that was due to the proliferation of STRs at the ocean front and then the detrimental impact to the neighborhood from parking and then loss of housing stock. Uh the overlay boundary is proposed to be reduced in area. And at yesterday's city council meeting, they did approve an extension for 60 days for that resolution. So just to be aware of that for this planning commission, you don't have that um deadline of today any any longer. Um within the existing overlay, there's a hundred there's 331 permitted STRs, and the proposed overlay um would contain 281 STRs that are currently permitted. And uh so those existing STRs that are outside of the newly proposed overlay, but within the existing overlay, would be considered grandfathered, and they would be allowed to continue to operate so long as they don't stop operation for a period of two years or longer. Um we have done a lot of outreach uh for this update. We have gone to the old beach design review committee, the Bayfront Advisory Commission, uh the Resort Advisory Commission's Transportation Parking Pedestrian Committee, and the Resort Advisory Commission's Planning Design Review Committee. The Hampton Roads Realtors Association was also briefed. Um we of course briefed this group at the last meeting, and letters were sent out to all of the um properties within the boundary that would be affected. Um through that outreach, we've gotten a lot of neutral feedback, just like questions about what would happen uh to those existing short-term rentals. Um we explained the grant bothered process, and uh we did get two letters in opposition that were included in the supplements, uh, the last supplement that went out. We've received about 17 calls. Um again, those were mostly asking questions, and and then I would say generally neutral um on the change. Um, if there are any questions on that item. And so I'll just oh, sorry, go ahead. Well, I'm not sure I have a specific question. What I'm really wanting to say is this what's in front of everybody today, is an alternate map. Had work with my councilman with regards to public input, and it was looked at to be to be too great a reduction in the vibe area. So, unlike the previous map, this now extends permitted STRs up to 18th Street before it's been pulled back. Um so this is an alternate map that's in front of you from the one that was here a month or two before. I think because of that, we probably want to take the time we've been given and not vote on it now, so you all have a chance to see it and and talk about it. However, I will say that the time we gave this has given a lot of people the opportunity to ask questions, find out what's it's going to mean to them. I I will say this, so it doesn't really come out clearly in the regs. Abandonment you know of a non-conforming use, which is what it would be, uh is an enforcement issue. It becomes very difficult at times to understand abandonment, uh, particularly for an STR. So the likelihood of abandonment, I'm not sure is that great. However, what it does do, and I'm not sure everybody understands this within the district.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com