The Planning Commission convened on November 13, 2025, at 2:00 PM (originally scheduled time) to consider two public hearings: a special use permit for Retro Junkie's outdoor patio and food truck, and a design review and density bonus request for the Sierra Garden affordable housing project. The meeting also included public comments on non-agenda items and updates on future agendas.
Staff presented a proposal to allow a 1,200 sq ft outdoor patio and a food truck at 2112 North Main Street. The food truck would operate Tuesday–Saturday, 6 PM to midnight; the existing bar hours (6 PM to 2 AM) remain unchanged. Security guards and cameras will be present. The project requires a special use permit and design review. The applicant (Enrique Montero, co-owner) confirmed the food truck is for patrons only, with wristbands; the rear entrance is an emergency exit/ADA accessible. Shared parking agreement with neighboring business extends to June 2027, but the permit would run to November 2027; the applicant agreed to amend. Commissioner Strongman raised concerns about pedestrian-vehicle conflict and lighting along the ADA path. The applicant committed to providing adequate lighting for the entire path of travel. The motion to approve included a condition (amendment to planning condition #10) requiring adequate lighting along the identified path. The motion passed unanimously (7-0).
Staff presented a proposal to demolish 29 existing units and construct a six-story, 87-unit (including manager's unit) 100% affordable housing development at 150 Sierra Drive. The project includes studios, one-, two-, and three-bedroom units, 58 surface parking stalls (reduced from 96 via density bonus concession), 90+ bike parking spaces, 6 EV parking spaces, and sustainable features. The applicant (Jonathan Astman, Satellite Affordable Housing Associates) requested four waivers and two concessions under state density bonus law (SB 330). The project qualifies for a Class 32 infill CEQA exemption. Public comments included concerns about parking overflow and traffic from neighbors, and strong support from others for increased affordable housing. The applicant noted 55-year affordability, relocation assistance for current residents (meeting Uniform Relocation Act), and a lottery for parking spaces. The design incorporates varied materials, a rounded corner, and screening trees. The commission discussed TDM measures, EV parking, and the need to ensure EV spaces are shown on the site plan. The motion to approve included a note to reflect EV parking on the civil site plan. The motion passed unanimously (7-0).
Good evening. Welcome to the November 13th meeting of the Planning Commission. Would you call the roll? Thank you, Chair. Commissioner Moran. Commissioner Cound. Here. Commissioner Strongman. Commissioner Quok? Here. Commissioner Klopp. Here. Commissioner Knighting. Vice Chair Knighting, excuse me. Still here. Chair Anderson. Here. We have a quorum. All are here. Very good. Do we have anything on the consent calendar tonight? Staff has no suggestions. And we can move on from number three, which is public communications. You have two opportunities to speak tonight. You can speak on either of the individual hearings that we have scheduled. If you have anything that you wish to speak on besides those items, something that is not on the agenda tonight, but it was within our jurisdiction. Yes, sir. And in either case, if you could fill out a speaker card, that would be helpful before you do it. You can do it after you're done. Getting the cost of living down in this area. And there's, you know, it's it's great, it's public school. There's a lot of really affluent people who are there, which is great. It's great that they want to, you know, live in Walnut Creek and live here and um, but you know, uh it makes me nervous about who's moving out. Um, you know, if this was a lower income area, we'd understand that pretty straightforwardly that's just gentrification, right? Like richer people are moving in and lower income people are moving out, including um people who work for the city or people who work for the county, they just can't afford to live here. Um, and I'd really encourage you to uh leave no stone unturned to try to make housing more affordable, right? With looking at how many houses you can build on a lot, uh looking at the building code, looking at how long it takes to approve permits to try to make that happen. Um and the other thing is, just a minute, Jack. Uh a lot of times the reason that people oppose new housing is because of traffic and and parking. Um I I think there's a lot that we could do in terms of traffic. You know, uh I think there's something like 400 kids that go to my kids' school, and maybe eight of them ride their bike to school, but there's no reason we can't. That's a solvable problem, right? If you look at Palo Alto, they have this whole website where 50% of the kids 50% uh ride their bikes to school or walk to school. Um and it's just it just goes up over time, and it's because they've made it like they've actually focused on it, right? And so they measure it. Like if you were asked a principal or the superintendent how many kids walk or back to school, they don't know the answer to that question. Um but we could start measuring that, and we could start optimizing it, and we could work with the PTAs. We could work with the city, we could work at the schools to try to get kids to actually like ride the bikes to school instead of driving to school, and that might Jack, be quite pretty. Okay, I did not have the timer on it on my card. I'll wrap up pretty pretty quickly.