OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Walnut Creek Planning Commission Meeting – December 11, 2025

City CouncilThursday, December 11, 2025
BodyWalnut Creek, California
SessionCity Council
DateThursday, December 11, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:29:14
Transcript — Verbatim
0:07

If we could have everybody take a seat, please we're gonna get started in 15 seconds.

0:37

All right, welcome.

0:38

Um good evening and welcome to the December 11th Planning Commission meeting.

0:43

Will the secretary please call the role?

0:46

Uh thank you.

0:47

Uh Commissioner Moran?

0:48

Here, Commissioner Cound.

0:49

Here.

0:49

Commissioner Strongman.

0:51

Commissioner Quok.

0:52

Here.

0:52

Commissioner Klopp.

0:53

Here.

0:53

Vice Chair Knighting.

0:55

Here.

0:56

Chair Anderson has phoned in.

0:58

He will not be here tonight.

0:59

So we have six.

1:00

We have a quorum.

1:02

Perfect.

1:03

Do we have anything on the consent calendar today?

1:06

We do not staff recommends no changes.

1:09

Okay, beautiful.

1:10

Now, before we begin, there are two opportunities for the public to provide comment.

1:16

The first is during the item of each agenda as it pertains on the agenda.

1:23

And the second one is would be right now, and it's for comment that is within the purview of the Planning Commission, but not something that is on the agenda.

1:34

So does anyone want to provide any public comment for items that are not on the agenda tonight?

1:44

Seeing none.

1:58

Has anyone had any experte communication?

2:01

Seeing none, lots of shaking heads.

2:03

Well, I just will say I drove all this, I drove all the sites, so perfect.

2:09

Does staff have a presentation?

2:12

Thank you.

2:40

And with the city, we have Ryan Cook, who is the senior civil engineer, also available for any questions after the presentation.

2:50

And just to quickly orient you with the site.

3:04

And it is located within the West Downtown specific plan and also listed as a housing site or where we envision housing future housing.

3:16

So it's listed in this inventory sites table.

3:21

And here are just some photographs really showing you what's currently on site.

3:26

It is that existing single story building with multiple tenants.

3:59

Sizes range from 591 square feet to uh roughly 1500 square feet.

4:06

And uh there is new ground floor as well as rooftop landscaping.

4:11

There is 80 parking stalls that will be located within the mechanical parking system as well as eight surface uh parking spaces for the commercial component.

4:20

Uh a drip line encroachment permit is also requested as part of this project, and uh because the project is providing eight very low income units, uh, it is um utilizing state density bonus law as uh also being processed under the housing accountability act, which I'll go into more detail or further in my presentation.

4:43

Uh so this project did go before the design review commission um on September 17th, where they reviewed the project as well as made some comments which are listed on this slide and made a recommendation to move the project forward to the commission to the Planning commission uh for consideration of the entitlements.

4:59

And the plans have been revised to address all of the lighting and lighting related comments as the project does include building mounted security lighting, the site distance triangle, as well as the drainage plan was reviewed by the city's traffic engineer and the public works department.

5:21

And the fire apparatus access is also shown on the plans.

5:26

The applicant is requesting to waive to did not address, did not incorporate a second material because they're requesting a waiver to that associating it with costs that are associated to the project.

5:42

And so tonight the planning commission will consider the design review for the new building, tree drip line encroachment permit, as well as the density bonus concessions and waivers, and also a conditional use permit, which is for the daycare portion of the project.

6:00

Before we go into the project, I really just wanted to touch on the applicable state housing laws that apply to this project.

6:09

So this project is being processed under the Housing Accountability Act, which does require cities to approve housing projects that meet the city's objective standards.

6:19

And the only way the city could deny this project is by making specific health or safety findings, and these findings must be based on objective existing written public health safety standards.

6:34

It's also being processed under SB 330, which essentially got adopted in 2019 to strengthen the housing accountability act, which means that if a project meets the city's objective standards, SB 330 essentially prevents the city from reducing those housing units or adding any new development standards after an application that was submitted to the city has been deemed complete.

7:00

And as mentioned earlier, they're utilizing density bonus, which, because they're providing affordable units as part of the project, and a waiver is granted when a development standard would physically preclude the project from being built at its permitted density.

7:18

The permitted density is the base density plus the additional units they get under density bonus law.

7:25

And concession is granted to reduce the overall construction costs of that standard or requirement, which is resulting in a more cost for the project.

7:41

And the city may only deny the waiver and concession if the city with substantial evidence can show that it causes a specific adverse health or safety impact.

7:55

And also regarding the concession, it could only be denied if the city can determine that the concession is not resulting in any cost savings for the project.

8:06

And just now I'm going to move on to the density of this project.

8:12

So the lot it is 0.55 acres, and the mixed use commercial general plan designation allows 88 dwelling units per acre, which then results to 49 units as the base density.

8:27

But because they're providing a low-income affordable units under density bonus, they get a 50% increase, which then results in 25 additional bonus units that could be added, then resulting in a total of 74 maximum units that could be built on this project.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning and Planning█████████████████████████████████████████████69%
Youth Programs███5%
Transportation Safety███5%
Community Engagement███5%
Procedural███4%
Public Safety███4%
Affordable Housing██3%
Engineering And Infrastructure██3%
Environmental Protection1%
Summary of Proceedings

Walnut Creek Planning Commission Meeting – December 11, 2025

The Walnut Creek Planning Commission met on December 11, 2025, to consider three major items: a mixed-use residential and commercial project at 2094 Mount Diablo Boulevard, a conditional use permit (CUP) for a private K‑8 school (LGD Academy) at 2449 Buena Vista Avenue, and a CUP for a bed‐and‐breakfast/short‑term rental at 1002 Hacienda Drive. The meeting lasted from approximately 7:00 PM to 10:15 PM. All six commissioners were present (Chair Anderson phoned in but was absent).

Consent Calendar

  • No items were on the consent calendar.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public comments were offered on items not on the agenda.

Discussion Items

1. Mixed‑Use Project at 2094 Mount Diablo Boulevard (Y24‑040)

  • Staff presented the project: demolition of an existing single‑story commercial building and construction of a 74‑unit mixed‑use building (72 market‑rate and 8 very low‑income units) with ground‑floor commercial space, a child‑care facility for residents, and an 88‑space mechanical parking system. The project is located in the West Downtown Specific Plan and is being processed under the Housing Accountability Act (HAA) and Senate Bill 330. The applicant requested five density‑bonus waivers (including driveway width, setback reductions, side/rear yard courts) and three concessions (a single building material, retention of existing frontage sidewalk, and waiver of the public‑art requirement). Staff recommended approval, noting that the project meets all objective standards and that the city cannot deny it without specific health/safety findings.
  • Commissioner questions centered on the sidewalk waiver (ability to widen future), childcare hours, elevator capacity, the public‑art fee waiver, and fire‑access. Staff confirmed that the 14‑foot sidewalk can be achieved later, that the daycare operates only for residents, and that the fire department approved an alternative means of access.
  • The applicant, Ben Johansson of LCA Architects, described design improvements since the Design Review Commission’s September hearing, including enhanced lighting, site‑distance triangles, and fire‑access solutions (dead‑end road up to 200 feet, wet standpipes, two stairs). He noted that the fire marshal approved the plan without requiring an aerial apparatus on site.
  • Public comment: One resident spoke in favor, expressing support for the project and acknowledging temporary construction disruption.
  • Commission discussion: Commissioners praised the project’s affordable housing component and design. No substantial concerns were raised.
  • Vote: Motion to approve the resolution, as amended, carried 6‑0. (Commissioners Quok, Cound, Moran, Strongman, Klopp, and Vice Chair Knighting all voted yes.)

2. Conditional Use Permit for LGD Academy at 2449 Buena Vista Avenue (Y23‑083)

  • Staff presented: the applicant, LGD Academy (a nonprofit), seeks a CUP to operate a private K‑8 Islamic school on the site of the Walnut Creek Islamic Center. The school previously operated without permits from fall 2023 to spring 2025, when it was ordered to cease. The facility consists of four one‑story buildings totaling 7,100 sq ft. Maximum enrollment is 90 students (previously 46). Hours are Monday–Thursday 8:00 AM to 3:45 PM, and Friday half‑days until 11:30 AM. The project is exempt from minimum parking under AB 2097 (within ½ mile of BART); a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan was approved. The applicant proposes to restripe the parking lot to improve circulation, decrease parking from 53 spaces to 33 spaces, and relocate student play to an interior courtyard to reduce noise. Staff recommended approval, finding the project consistent with the General Plan and not detrimental to public health/safety/welfare.
  • Public comment was extensive, with eight speakers in favor and several opposing. Supporters (including parents, students, educators, and community members) highlighted the school’s academic quality, leadership curriculum (Leader in Me), ability to serve neurodivergent learners, and the value of an Islamic school option. Opposing neighbors raised concerns about increased traffic and noise, especially from the mosque’s Friday prayers, and argued that the school’s operations previously caused spillover parking, blocked driveways, and noise. Several noted that the school and mosque share the site, but supporters stressed that school hours do not overlap with Friday prayers. The applicant offered to act as a liaison and committed to addressing any issues.
  • Commission debate centered on whether to approve immediately or continue to allow further studies (noise, traffic). Commissioners Moran and Strongman advocated for a continuance to gather more data. Others argued that existing conditions (e.g., compliance with noise ordinance) were sufficient and that the CUP findings could be made. Ultimately, a motion to approve passed 4‑2.
  • Vote: Quok yes, Cound yes, Moran no, Strongman no, Klopp yes, Vice Chair Knighting yes. (Motion carried 4‑2.)

3. Conditional Use Permit for Bed & Breakfast at 1002 Hacienda Drive (Y25‑066)

  • Staff presented: the applicant, Jennifer Song, proposes to operate a short‑term rental (classified as a bed‑and‑breakfast under the city’s zoning code) at a single‑family home she owns but does not occupy. The property is a 3‑bedroom, 2.5‑bath home with five off‑street parking spaces (three required). The applicant lives in Oakland, 15 minutes away, and plans to be available 24/7. The project meets all CUP findings, including location within 500 feet of an arterial/collector street (Walnut Avenue). The home was previously operated as an Airbnb without a permit; the applicant applied for the CUP after a code enforcement notice in August 2025. The business plan includes a maximum 7‑day stay, quiet hours (10 PM–8 AM), a noise monitor, and no special events. Staff recommended approval.
  • Public comment: Eight residents spoke in opposition, describing negative experiences: parties, noise, damage, trespassing, and the presence of commercial vehicles. They argued the applicant’s statements about good faith and compliance were inconsistent (the listing remained active after claiming it was taken down). They emphasized the close‑knit nature of the neighborhood and concerns about an unhosted short‑term rental setting a precedent. Several noted the applicant is a real estate investor with multiple properties, not a resident moving in soon.
  • The applicant explained her personal story (safety concerns in Oakland, desire to eventually move in) and offered to accept a 30‑day minimum stay or a sunset clause. She acknowledged the illegal operation but said she corrected it.
  • Commission discussion: Commissioner Strongman moved to approve as amended, but there was no second. After further discussion, commissioners agreed to add conditions: (1) a one‑year review hearing to be placed on the commission’s calendar, and (2) modification of Condition 11 to change “may” to “shall”, ensuring that any noncompliance triggers a public hearing for potential revocation or amendment. The applicant accepted these conditions. A new motion was made and seconded.
  • Vote: Moran yes, Quok yes, Cound yes, Klopp yes, Vice Chair Knighting yes, Strongman no. (Motion carried 5‑1.)

Key Outcomes

  • Project at 2094 Mount Diablo Blvd: Approved 6‑0. The resolution includes all requested density‑bonus waivers and concessions, a Class 32 CEQA exemption, and the conditional use permit for the daycare.
  • LGD Academy at 2449 Buena Vista Ave: Approved 4‑2. The CUP allows the private school to operate with up to 90 students. The approved TDM plan (including a shared parking agreement with a nearby property) and conditions on noise and outdoor activities are included.
  • Bed & Breakfast at 1002 Hacienda Drive: Approved 5‑1 with added conditions: the commission will hold a review hearing within one year, and Condition 11 is strengthened to require a public hearing upon any verified noncompliance. The permit is subject to all standard findings and the applicant’s business plan.

Adjournment

The meeting adjourned at approximately 10:15 PM. The next scheduled meeting (January 8, 2026) was canceled; the next meeting will be January 22, 2026.

Meeting Transcript

If we could have everybody take a seat, please we're gonna get started in 15 seconds. All right, welcome. Um good evening and welcome to the December 11th Planning Commission meeting. Will the secretary please call the role? Uh thank you. Uh Commissioner Moran? Here, Commissioner Cound. Here. Commissioner Strongman. Commissioner Quok. Here. Commissioner Klopp. Here. Vice Chair Knighting. Here. Chair Anderson has phoned in. He will not be here tonight. So we have six. We have a quorum. Perfect. Do we have anything on the consent calendar today? We do not staff recommends no changes. Okay, beautiful. Now, before we begin, there are two opportunities for the public to provide comment. The first is during the item of each agenda as it pertains on the agenda. And the second one is would be right now, and it's for comment that is within the purview of the Planning Commission, but not something that is on the agenda. So does anyone want to provide any public comment for items that are not on the agenda tonight? Seeing none. Has anyone had any experte communication? Seeing none, lots of shaking heads. Well, I just will say I drove all this, I drove all the sites, so perfect. Does staff have a presentation? Thank you. And with the city, we have Ryan Cook, who is the senior civil engineer, also available for any questions after the presentation. And just to quickly orient you with the site. And it is located within the West Downtown specific plan and also listed as a housing site or where we envision housing future housing. So it's listed in this inventory sites table. And here are just some photographs really showing you what's currently on site. It is that existing single story building with multiple tenants. Sizes range from 591 square feet to uh roughly 1500 square feet. And uh there is new ground floor as well as rooftop landscaping. There is 80 parking stalls that will be located within the mechanical parking system as well as eight surface uh parking spaces for the commercial component. Uh a drip line encroachment permit is also requested as part of this project, and uh because the project is providing eight very low income units, uh, it is um utilizing state density bonus law as uh also being processed under the housing accountability act, which I'll go into more detail or further in my presentation. Uh so this project did go before the design review commission um on September 17th, where they reviewed the project as well as made some comments which are listed on this slide and made a recommendation to move the project forward to the commission to the Planning commission uh for consideration of the entitlements. And the plans have been revised to address all of the lighting and lighting related comments as the project does include building mounted security lighting, the site distance triangle, as well as the drainage plan was reviewed by the city's traffic engineer and the public works department. And the fire apparatus access is also shown on the plans. The applicant is requesting to waive to did not address, did not incorporate a second material because they're requesting a waiver to that associating it with costs that are associated to the project. And so tonight the planning commission will consider the design review for the new building, tree drip line encroachment permit, as well as the density bonus concessions and waivers, and also a conditional use permit, which is for the daycare portion of the project. Before we go into the project, I really just wanted to touch on the applicable state housing laws that apply to this project. So this project is being processed under the Housing Accountability Act, which does require cities to approve housing projects that meet the city's objective standards.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com