Thu, Dec 11, 2025·Walnut Creek, California·City Council

Walnut Creek Planning Commission Meeting Summary (2025-12-11)

Discussion Breakdown

Zoning and Planning69%
Youth Programs5%
Transportation Safety5%
Community Engagement5%
Procedural4%
Public Safety4%
Affordable Housing3%
Engineering And Infrastructure3%
Environmental Protection1%
Economic Development1%

Summary

Walnut Creek Planning Commission Meeting (December 11, 2025)

The Planning Commission (six members present; Chair Anderson absent/phonic in earlier) held hearings on (1) a 74-unit mixed-use housing project using State Density Bonus/Housing Accountability Act, (2) a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a K–8 private school (LGD/Al Judy Academy) at an existing religious facility near BART invoking AB 2097 parking rules, and (3) a CUP to legalize/permit a “bed and breakfast” (short-term rental/Airbnb) in a single-family neighborhood. The Commission approved the housing project unanimously, approved the school CUP on a split vote after extensive testimony, and approved the short-term rental CUP with added review/oversight conditions.

Discussion Items

  • 2094 Mount Diablo Blvd — Mixed-use housing (Design Review, Density Bonus, daycare CUP, condo map, tree dripline encroachment)

    • Staff presentation:
      • Site in West Downtown Specific Plan; mixed-use building with ground-floor commercial and 74 residential units.
      • 8 very low-income units; project processed under Housing Accountability Act, SB 330, and State Density Bonus Law.
      • Density math stated: 0.55 acres, base density 49 units (88 du/ac), plus 50% bonus (25) for a 74-unit maximum/proposed.
      • Parking stated: 80 stalls in a mechanical parking system + 8 surface stalls for commercial.
      • Includes 860 sq ft daycare (resident amenity; not open to public), hours Mon–Fri 7:30 a.m.–5:30 p.m.
      • CEQA: recommended Class 32 infill exemption.
      • Concessions requested: single primary facade material (cost), retain existing frontage vs 14-ft sidewalk widening (cost/stormwater trigger), waive public art requirement (cost savings; staff discussed $30M estimate → 1% ≈ $300k).
    • Applicant (Ben Johansson, LCA Architects):
      • Asserted project improves safety via 24/7 residential activity and lighting.
      • Described work with Contra Costa Fire Protection District and Building Division; alternative means/methods for fire access; wet standpipes; two stairs; mechanical ventilation changes for safe egress.
      • Confirmed mechanical parking system will be gated and have safety controls.
    • Commission questions/concerns:
      • Future ability to implement 14-ft sidewalk (staff: yes, sufficient ROW; future road diet would deliver section).
      • Daycare closing time questioned (5:30 p.m.); applicant/owner present for follow-up.
      • Elevator sufficiency for move-ins (staff: meets code).
      • Public art concession/fee waiver rationale clarified (waiver of art requirement; fee shown to demonstrate cost savings).
  • 2449 Buena Vista Ave — LGD/Al Judy Academy K–8 private school (CUP)

    • Staff presentation (Stephen Cook, Assistant Planner):
      • CUP to establish a K–8 private school within existing Walnut Creek Islamic Center property.
      • Noted school previously operated Fall 2023–Spring 2025; directed to cease until permits obtained.
      • AB 2097 invoked after agenda publication: project within 1/2 mile of Walnut Creek BART, so City cannot impose minimum off-street parking requirements.
      • Max enrollment: 90 students (previously 46). Staffing described: 4 admin, 2 credentialed teachers, 10 part-time teachers/training.
      • Hours: Mon–Thu drop-off 8:00–8:40 a.m.; pickup 3:30–3:45 p.m.; Friday half-day pickup 11:30 a.m.
      • Parking lot restriping for drop-off/pick-up circulation and ADA/fire access.
      • TDM plan approved (monitoring/contingency). If spillover parking observed, TDM includes a shared parking agreement at 2317 Buena Vista Ave (~77 spaces).
      • Noise: condition proposed prohibiting outdoor school-related activities in the parking lot; instruction to occur indoors.
      • CEQA: Class 1 (15301) Existing Facilities exemption recommended.
    • Applicant testimony (Yesra Nassiri, founder/parent):
      • Expressed support for establishing the school as the first Islamic school in the Walnut Creek/Tri-Valley area.
      • Described “Leader in Me” program; emphasized desire to be a good neighbor and mitigate issues the school is responsible for.
      • Stated school schedule is staggered to reduce traffic; encouraged walking/biking; noted small class sizes and that growth to 90 would be gradual.
    • Public comments & testimony (positions):
      • Support (multiple parents/staff/students and community orgs):
        • Speakers (including a student) expressed strong support for the school’s educational environment, leadership curriculum, and cultural/religious fit.
        • Several speakers argued parking and Friday-prayer congestion are being conflated with school operations and asked the Commission to treat them separately.
        • CAIR representative urged approval and stated school worked in good faith on operations and traffic plans.
        • Some supporters suggested stronger enforcement/towing for illegal Friday parking.
      • Opposition/concerns (nearby residents):
        • Residents raised concerns about parking congestion/spillover, particularly Fridays, and questioned behavior change given limited use of overflow parking.
        • Concerns about noise, especially given a changed/no longer tall retaining wall; requested a noise study and more review before approving.
        • Concern raised that parking would be reduced from 53 to 33 spaces, potentially worsening neighborhood impacts.
    • Commission deliberation:
      • Some commissioners requested more study (noise/traffic modeling) and more time to review the newly submitted TDM materials.
      • Other commissioners emphasized the CUP findings and the ability to separate school impacts from mosque activities.
  • 1002 Hacienda Dr — “Bed and Breakfast Inn” (short-term rental/Airbnb) CUP

    • Staff presentation (Gerardo Victoria, Assistant Planner):
      • CUP requested after code enforcement case opened for operating Airbnb without a permit.
      • Home: single-family residence (approx. 1,500 sq ft); proposed operation: 3 bedrooms, one booking at a time (other rooms not separately booked), minimum 2 nights, maximum 7 days, quiet hours 10 p.m.–8 a.m.
      • Stated: check-in via code, security camera at garage, interior noise monitor, no special events, evict for rule violations.
      • Parking: 5 stalls provided (3 required).
      • CEQA: Class 1 (15301) Existing Facilities exemption recommended.
      • Housekeeping correction: remove incorrect ADU reference.
    • Applicant (Jennifer Song):
      • Explained intent to move to Walnut Creek but delayed due to family caregiving; said short-term rental chosen for screening/oversight and flexibility.
      • Stated listing had been taken offline after understanding CUP requirement; acknowledged there were stays between notice and taking it offline.
      • Offered willingness to consider alternatives (including longer stays) and a “sunset clause.”
    • Public comments (positions):
      • Opposition (multiple neighbors): expressed strong opposition to an unhosted short-term rental; cited observed parties/noise, trespassing, property damage, and neighborhood safety concerns; argued it would change neighborhood character.
      • Several speakers claimed the listing remained active after stated cessation and argued approval would reward noncompliance.
    • Commission deliberation:
      • Commissioners discussed whether approving would be seen as rewarding unpermitted operation versus creating an enforceable framework.
      • The Commission added conditions for stronger oversight, including a mandatory review within one year and strengthening the language regarding Commission authority to amend/revoke upon noncompliance.

Key Outcomes

  • 2094 Mount Diablo Blvd (Mixed-use housing): Approved unanimously (6–0)

    • Approved: Tentative Map 9697 (condo), Final Design Review, Density Bonus (concessions/waivers), Tree Dripline Encroachment Permit, CUP for resident-only daycare, and CEQA exemption.
  • 2449 Buena Vista Ave (LGD/Al Judy Academy school CUP): Approved (3–2)

    • Vote recorded: Yes—Quok, Cound, Klopp; No—Moran, Strongman; Vice Chair Knighting did not vote “yes” in the final tally as read (motion carried on 3–2).
    • Resolution updated to reflect AB 2097 and include the approved TDM plan.
  • 1002 Hacienda Dr (Bed & Breakfast/short-term rental CUP): Approved with amendments (5–1)

    • Added/clarified conditions during hearing:
      • Planning Commission review hearing required within one year (new condition).
      • Strengthened the enforcement/review language (amended condition regarding Commission authority to amend/revoke upon noncompliance).
    • Vote recorded: Yes—Moran, Quok, Cound, Klopp, Vice Chair Knighting; No—Strongman.

Other / Administrative

  • Next meetings: January 8, 2026 meeting canceled; next scheduled meeting January 22, 2026.
  • 2026 parking passes to be distributed; commissioners instructed to return old passes next meeting.

Meeting Transcript

If we could have everybody take a seat, please we're gonna get started in 15 seconds. All right, welcome. Um good evening and welcome to the December 11th Planning Commission meeting. Will the secretary please call the role? Uh thank you. Uh Commissioner Moran? Here, Commissioner Cound. Here. Commissioner Strongman. Commissioner Quok. Here. Commissioner Klopp. Here. Vice Chair Knighting. Here. Chair Anderson has phoned in. He will not be here tonight. So we have six. We have a quorum. Perfect. Do we have anything on the consent calendar today? We do not staff recommends no changes. Okay, beautiful. Now, before we begin, there are two opportunities for the public to provide comment. The first is during the item of each agenda as it pertains on the agenda. And the second one is would be right now, and it's for comment that is within the purview of the Planning Commission, but not something that is on the agenda. So does anyone want to provide any public comment for items that are not on the agenda tonight? Seeing none. Has anyone had any experte communication? Seeing none, lots of shaking heads. Well, I just will say I drove all this, I drove all the sites, so perfect. Does staff have a presentation? Thank you. And with the city, we have Ryan Cook, who is the senior civil engineer, also available for any questions after the presentation. And just to quickly orient you with the site. And it is located within the West Downtown specific plan and also listed as a housing site or where we envision housing future housing. So it's listed in this inventory sites table. And here are just some photographs really showing you what's currently on site. It is that existing single story building with multiple tenants. Sizes range from 591 square feet to uh roughly 1500 square feet. And uh there is new ground floor as well as rooftop landscaping. There is 80 parking stalls that will be located within the mechanical parking system as well as eight surface uh parking spaces for the commercial component. Uh a drip line encroachment permit is also requested as part of this project, and uh because the project is providing eight very low income units, uh, it is um utilizing state density bonus law as uh also being processed under the housing accountability act, which I'll go into more detail or further in my presentation. Uh so this project did go before the design review commission um on September 17th, where they reviewed the project as well as made some comments which are listed on this slide and made a recommendation to move the project forward to the commission to the Planning commission uh for consideration of the entitlements. And the plans have been revised to address all of the lighting and lighting related comments as the project does include building mounted security lighting, the site distance triangle, as well as the drainage plan was reviewed by the city's traffic engineer and the public works department. And the fire apparatus access is also shown on the plans. The applicant is requesting to waive to did not address, did not incorporate a second material because they're requesting a waiver to that associating it with costs that are associated to the project. And so tonight the planning commission will consider the design review for the new building, tree drip line encroachment permit, as well as the density bonus concessions and waivers, and also a conditional use permit, which is for the daycare portion of the project. Before we go into the project, I really just wanted to touch on the applicable state housing laws that apply to this project. So this project is being processed under the Housing Accountability Act, which does require cities to approve housing projects that meet the city's objective standards.