OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Walnut Creek Planning Commission Meeting - September 10, 2026

City CouncilThursday, September 10, 2026
BodyWalnut Creek, California
SessionCity Council
DateThursday, September 10, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:37:54

Transcript — Verbatim
0:04

I do not want to walk out of here without giving NOD.

0:07

Yes, yes, yes, good evening and welcome to the September 10th Planning Commission meeting.

0:14

Will the Secretary please call the roll?

0:18

Yes.

0:18

Commissioner Anderson informed me that he would not be able to attend this evening.

0:22

Commissioner Moran?

0:24

Here.

0:24

Commissioner Cowan?

0:25

Here.

0:25

Commissioner Strongman.

0:26

Here.

0:27

Commissioner Quok?

0:28

Here.

0:28

Vice Chair Clock?

0:29

Here.

0:30

And Chair Needing.

0:31

Here.

0:33

And I believe we just have one item on the consent calendar.

0:40

Yes, that is correct.

0:41

And that is the meeting minutes of August 27th 2026.

0:47

Does anybody does any of the commissioners wish to review that or I would take a vote?

0:57

Do you need a motion?

0:58

Yes, please.

0:59

I move to approve the minutes of August 27th.

1:03

Okay.

1:05

All right.

1:06

Commissioner Moran?

1:08

Yes.

1:08

Commissioner Cowan?

1:09

Yes.

1:10

Commissioner Strongman?

1:11

Yes.

1:11

Commissioner Quak.

1:12

Yes.

1:13

Vice Chair Claw?

1:14

Yes.

1:15

And Chair Needing.

1:16

Yes.

1:16

The motion passes.

1:18

Perfect.

1:19

And now before we move on to public communications.

1:24

Actually, sorry.

1:26

There are two opportunities for the public to provide comment.

1:29

The first is right now with items that are not on the agenda but are within the purview of the planning commission.

1:36

And the second is during the actual agenda item, which you see before you as item number four.

1:42

So is there anybody that would like to discuss something that is not on the agenda?

1:50

No.

1:51

Okay.

1:52

Perfect.

1:53

Have there been any ex parte communications?

1:57

Lots of shaking heads.

2:00

Okay.

2:01

Perfect.

2:02

And so now we're going to start with item 4A, which is Joy Bound Animal Daycare Building C UP Design Review Tree Removal, Sign Ordinance Exception Application.

2:16

I see that Simmers coming for the presentation.

2:20

Thank you.

2:25

Yeah.

2:25

Great.

2:26

So good evening, uh Chair and members of the Commission.

2:30

Simmer Gill, interim principal planner with the city.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Signage█████████████████████████████████████████████65%
Zoning and Planning██████████14%
Procedural██████8%
Animal Welfare███4%
Community Engagement██3%
Sustainability██3%
Noise Control2%
Tree Management1%
Summary of Proceedings

Walnut Creek Planning Commission Meeting - September 10, 2026

The Walnut Creek Planning Commission met on Thursday, September 10, 2026, at 6:00 PM in the Council Chamber at 1666 North Main Street. Commissioners present: Pamela Nieting (Chair), Molly P. Clopp (Vice Chair), Steven Kwok, Ken Strongman, Cherise Khaund, Brendan Moran. Commissioner Brandt Andersson was absent. The meeting adjourned at 7:38 PM.

Consent Calendar

  • Adoption of Meeting Minutes of August 27, 2026: Unanimously approved (6-0). Motion by Cherise Khaund, second by Ken Strongman.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public comments were received on any agenda item.

Discussion Items

  • Item 4a – Joybound Animal Daycare Building (2890 Mitchell Drive): The applicant, Joybound (formerly ARF), requested a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Design Review, Tree Removal Permit, and Sign Ordinance Exception to expand its existing cultural institution use with a new 12,577-square-foot animal daycare building. The project also includes outdoor training/exercise areas, covered dog runs, landscaping, additional parking, and removal of 13 trees (10 requiring a permit; none are highly protected). The site is 8.6 acres, with 1.56 acres vacant. A Negative Declaration was prepared under CEQA after a 20-day review period with no public or agency comments. Staff (Simar Gill) and the applicant team (architect John Parezo and CFO Cheryl McKenna) presented. Key discussion points included noise mitigation (operational noise from dogs measured below required decibel levels, with sound walls, berms, and indoor kennels used), the “crisis support program” (reserving at least 20% of capacity for temporary animal care during domestic violence, medical, or disaster situations), and sign exceptions for a 144 sq ft total sign area (exceeding the 100 sq ft business park allowance but below the 200 sq ft typical maximum) and retention of an existing 29 sq ft monument sign (24 sq ft allowed). The commission praised the project’s sustainability features (water treatment, landscaping) and regional disaster response potential.
  • Item 4b – Sign Ordinance Update (Citywide): The city proposed a comprehensive update to Title 10, Chapter 8 of the Municipal Code, last overhauled in 1992. Consultants Michael Gibbons and Nikki Zanchetta (Mintier Harnish) presented. The update aims to modernize regulations, enhance flexibility for businesses, and reduce visual clutter. Key proposed changes include: reformatted zone-based tables; increased sign area allowances (1.5–2 sq ft per linear foot of building frontage, up to 150–200 sq ft total); a new minor deviation process (up to 20% dimensional increase or one additional sign); updated standards for portable (A-frame) signs, painted wall signs, cabinet signs, and projected light signs; and amortization of non-conforming signs over 15 years. The commission provided direction on two specific staff questions: (1) Sign area allowance by zoning district – the commission unanimously supported differentiating allowances by zone rather than a uniform citywide standard, citing clarity and consistency with other objective standards. (2) Maximum number of signs per business – after debate, the commission supported limiting signs to 4 for standalone businesses and 3 for multi-tenant buildings, to balance advertising needs with visual clutter reduction. The chair noted this would work with the minor deviation and non-conforming sign provisions. No public testimony was received on this item.

Key Outcomes

  • Joybound Animal Daycare Building: Unanimously adopted Resolution No. 4022 (Negative Declaration) and Resolution No. 4023 (approving CUP, Design Review, Tree Removal Permit, and Sign Ordinance Exception). Motion by Cherise Khaund, second by Ken Strongman. Vote: 6-0.
  • Sign Ordinance Update: Unanimously adopted a resolution (No. 4023 per minutes, but likely 4024 – note discrepancy: minutes list same number as previous item) recommending that the City Council approve the proposed sign ordinance update with the commission’s direction on zone-based allowances and sign number limits. Motion by Steven Kwok, second by Ken Strongman. Vote: 6-0.
  • Staff Announcements: Planning Secretary Meily Sheehan noted a joint Planning Commission/Design Review Commission meeting on October 22, 2026, for the General Plan Update Existing Conditions Report, and promoted the city’s online parcel viewer tool for zoning and property information.

Meeting Transcript

I do not want to walk out of here without giving NOD. Yes, yes, yes, good evening and welcome to the September 10th Planning Commission meeting. Will the Secretary please call the roll? Yes. Commissioner Anderson informed me that he would not be able to attend this evening. Commissioner Moran? Here. Commissioner Cowan? Here. Commissioner Strongman. Here. Commissioner Quok? Here. Vice Chair Clock? Here. And Chair Needing. Here. And I believe we just have one item on the consent calendar. Yes, that is correct. And that is the meeting minutes of August 27th 2026. Does anybody does any of the commissioners wish to review that or I would take a vote? Do you need a motion? Yes, please. I move to approve the minutes of August 27th. Okay. All right. Commissioner Moran? Yes. Commissioner Cowan? Yes. Commissioner Strongman? Yes. Commissioner Quak. Yes. Vice Chair Claw? Yes. And Chair Needing. Yes. The motion passes. Perfect. And now before we move on to public communications. Actually, sorry. There are two opportunities for the public to provide comment. The first is right now with items that are not on the agenda but are within the purview of the planning commission. And the second is during the actual agenda item, which you see before you as item number four. So is there anybody that would like to discuss something that is not on the agenda? No. Okay. Perfect. Have there been any ex parte communications?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com