Councilmember Brooke Pinto (Ward 2) chaired a public hearing of the Judiciary Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety to review Mayor Bowser's proposed Fiscal Year 2027 budgets for the Office of Unified Communications (OUC) and the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD). The hearing took place on Wednesday, April 29, 2026, from 9:54 AM to 3:19 PM in Room 412 of the John A. Wilson Building. The proposed OUC budget is $60.2 million (a 7% decrease from FY26), while MPD's proposed budget is $688.5 million (a 14% increase, largely due to overtime and collective bargaining agreement costs). Councilmembers heard from 25 public witnesses and then questioned OUC Director Heather McGaffin and MPD Interim Chief Jeffrey Carroll.
Recording in progress. Good morning, everyone. I would like to call to order this public hearing of the Judiciary Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety. I am Councilmember Brooke Pinto, representing Ward 2 and chairwoman of the committee. The time is 9 54 AM on Wednesday, April 29th, 2026. We are conducting this hearing in person in room 412 of the John A. Wilson building and streaming virtually on the DC Council's website and YouTube and X at CM Brook Pinto. Today the committee will continue its review of Mayor Bowser's proposed fiscal year 2027 budget and financial plan with a round of hearings on agency budgets. Today we're discussing the Office of Unified Communications and the Metropolitan Police Department. First, we're gonna hear from our public witnesses to discuss the Office of Unified Communications or OUC. After we hear, and then we're gonna hear from our public witnesses to discuss MPD. After we hear from all of our public witnesses for both agencies, we'll then turn to Director Heather McGaffin of OUC. OUC is responsible for providing fast professional and cost-effective response to emergency and non-emergency calls in the district. OUC was established in 2005 to combine the emergency 911, non-emergency and 311 call activities from the Metropolitan Police Department, fire and emergency medical services, and customer service operations. The mayor's proposed FY27 operating budget provides OUC with approximately $60.2 million, which is a 4.5 million or 7% decrease from the FY26 approved budget. Shifts a significant number of vacancy savings. These are crucial and difficult jobs. I am eager today to hear about how the proposed FY27 budget supports continued efforts to bolster our recruitment and retain our quality sworn officers for the department. We must continue the successful efforts to drive down violent crime, like the one that we've seen, the overall decrease of 29% from 2024 to 2025, an overall 53% decrease we've seen over the last two years. The proposed budget has an overall increase in funding for MPD, but no additional FTEs allocated, largely due to more accurately funding for overtime. I look forward to hearing about how this funding will support the department's ongoing initiatives that continue to result in reduced levels of violent crime, support our staffing, and include a notable 43% decrease in homicides in 2026 so far compared to this time last year. Concerningly, though, we've seen a 35% increase in assaults with a dangerous weapon, and we've seen increases in domestic violence cases. It's also vital to ensure that MPD's facilities are properly maintained and updated to serve all corners of the district. I look forward to asking interim chief Carol about the capital projects related to these efforts and how the financial plan supports the continued investments we need to pursue public safety. I also want to note that we have had a particularly violent month, including children who were shot just last night. And as we look at this budget, we have to ensure that all of our public safety agencies have the funding that they need to play their role in keeping everyone safe. And so when we continue to push on the staffing levels at MPD, that is an important piece of the puzzle in ensuring that not only everyone can be safe, but we're also not overworking our officers, which then leads to burnout and then more overtime. First, we're going to hear today from our public witnesses for OUC. As a reminder, all of our public witnesses will have three minutes to present their testimony. And for our virtual public witnesses, when I call your name as a reminder to please accept our invitation to join as a panelist. All right, with that, uh we will turn to our public witnesses. Lisa Abrams, Veronica Mosqueta, Chairperson Troopdi Patel, and Michaela Deming. Welcome to you all. And we will begin with Lisa Abrams, Vice President of Government Affairs for the Hotel Association of Washington, D.C. Good morning, Chairperson Pinto and members and staff of the committee. I'm Lisa Abrams, Vice President of Government Affairs of the Hotel Association Washington, D.C. I'm here to testify in opposition to Title III, subtitle A of the fiscal year 2027 Budget Support Act, which is the Public Services Hotel Occupancy Fee Amendment Act of 2025. This subtitle seeks to impose a tax upon all hotels of 80 cents per room or suite rental per night. Hotels already contribute heftily to the district's coffers, including already paying into the E911 special purpose revenue fund with a tax on all of their landlines as well as for each cell phone that it has for their employees. This is the fifth time that the mayor has proposed this tax on our industry, first in 2017, again in 2019, 2024, and 2025, and now this year. The E911 special purpose revenue fund was created to help defray 911 technology and equipment costs for OUC. However, the agency has continuously used the fund for non-technology purposes such as personnel, travel training, and contractual costs. Moreover, the mayor's intent to have the monies for this additional tax deposited into the general fund to use for other purposes. This clearly is not what the fund was created for. It is also unreasonable to burden the hotel industry with a tax to support a government agency whose core function is not related to travel. The proposed tax will have a significant impact on group bookings and make the district less less competitive against other destinations. The hotel industry is one of the highest tax industries in the district by far. Last fiscal year, at a tax rate of 15.95%, the hotel tax generated 408 million dollars. This makes up 19.5% of all sales tax collections for the district. Travelers to the city spend billions of dollars, creating a significant amount of tax revenue for the district.