On May 4, 2026, from 9:07 AM to 11:37 AM, the Committee on Human Services, chaired by Councilmember Matt Freuman (Ward 3), held a budget oversight hearing on the Office of Lottery and Gaming (OLG). The hearing examined OLG's proposed fiscal year 2027 budget, operational challenges, and potential expansions of gaming in the District. Public witnesses testified on off-track betting (OTB) and historical horse racing (HHR), games of skill, and regulatory oversight. Government witnesses, led by Executive Director Randy Burnside, addressed the agency's budget, a recent drawing error, and the status of the lottery system contract.
Recording in progress. Good morning everyone. I am Matt Freuman, Ward Three Council Member and Chairperson of the Committee on Human Services. Today is Monday, May 4th, and we are meeting in person in room one twenty-three of the John A. Wilson building and virtually via Zoom. The time is now nine oh seven AM. Today we are conducting the budget oversight hearing on the Office of Lottery and Gaming or OLG. OLG is the regulatory body over all licensed gaming in the District of Columbia, including lottery, charitable gaming, and sports wagering. OLG functions in a manner different from many other district agencies as it is an enterprise fund, meaning OLG generates revenue that it uses both to run the agency and to transfer to the general fund. Since its inception in nineteen eighty-two, the DC lottery has transferred more than two point four three billion dollars to the district's general fund. The red light indicates your mic is on. After our witness is done providing his testimony, I and if other council members come may ask a series of questions before moving to our virtual witnesses. I'll now call our in-person witness. I don't see Mr. Sanchez. So if Mr. Sanchez arrives, we will give him the opportunity to testify in person should he choose to join us online. Uh he's welcome to do that. In the meantime, I don't is there anyone else here who uh who wanted to testify in person who wasn't listed. Does not look like that is the case. I will now call our virtual witnesses to speak in panels of four. For each witness, I will call your name and a member of my staff will make you a panelist. If you uh wish to appear on video, you must click the button in the toolbar at the bottom of your screen that looks like a video camera. Please remain muted until it is your turn to testify. When it is your turn to testify, please unmute yourself. Once all our virtual witnesses on a panel for in each panel of four have testified, I and if other council members join may ask a round of questions, so please stay on the Zoom muted until you are recalled. For any technical difficulties, you can send a message to the host, which is labeled Committee on Human Services, and they will follow up with you. Additionally, if you are having trouble gaining access to the Zoom and you have pre-registered, you can reach my team at Human Services at DC Council.gov, and they will try to resolve your issue. Now let's turn to our first panel of virtual witnesses. Uh Jordan Briggs, Elise Cohn, Christopher Khalitri, Richard Baldwin. All right. Wonderful. It looks like all are in place. Jordan Briggs, when you are ready, we can start. Thank you. Good morning. My name is Jordan Briggs. I'm an attorney at IFRA Law, a boutique gaming law firm based here in DC. IFRA Law has many accolades in the gaming space, including being instrumental in creating the legislative and regulatory framework for online gaming in Delaware, New Jersey, and Nevada. I'm here to talk about the legality of implementing off-track betting sites and historical horse racing in DC. I'll refer to these as OTBs and HHR in my testimony. Under the paramutual laws of the state and agreements with racetracks, OTBs allow patrons to place paramutual wagers on live horse races without physically being present at the racetrack. Bets are pulled together, the operators take a regulated commission, and winners share the remaining pools. HHR machines offer a form of paramutual wagering that fits well into this framework. On HHR machines, users may engage with paramutual wagering with pooled bets on the basis of previously run horse races, irrespective of the on-screen visual. We believe that federal law does not prohibit DC from creating a framework to license OTBs and provide HHR in the district. The Johnson Act prohibits the interset interstate transportation of gambling devices, and this definition includes DC and states. However, the Johnson Act has an exemption for any machine designed and manufactured primarily for use at a racetrack in connection with paramutual vetting. This exemption applies to OTBs and HHR because they both provide paramutual wagering under government licensing schemes with permission from the racetracks. The Act also exempts devices explicitly enumerated as lawful by state statute.