OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Council Roundtable Hearing on Revenue Bond Project Approvals - May 14, 2026

Council of the District of ColumbiaThursday, May 14, 2026
BodyWashington, District Of Columbia
SessionCouncil of the District of Columbia
DateThursday, May 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:00:47
Transcript — Verbatim
4:15

Um before the council acts on them.

4:25

The record in this matter will close at four five p.m.

4:28

on May 18th, 2026.

4:40

So we have a lot of witnesses.

4:43

Although I'm guessing it's probably about four or five percent.

4:43

I think revenue bonds project approval reserve.

4:52

Did you sign executive officer advisor and Darren Glimp, partner at ORC, Harrington and Sutcliffe LL table?

5:01

I'm fine.

5:04

And is Ms.

5:05

Dalton here?

5:08

Okay.

5:10

Um, and uh for the record, you're Patricia.

5:16

Otherwise known as Pat.

5:18

Um please proceed.

5:21

Good morning, Chairman Mendelssohn.

5:23

I am Pat Brantley of Friendship Public Charter School.

5:27

I'm here today to request the council's approval of up to 90 million in tax exempt revenue bonds, and to explain why this bond issuance is both warranted and prudent.

5:37

Friendship is a 15 campus public charter school network serving 4,600 students and employing over 1,000 staff across wards four, five, six, seven, and eight.

5:49

Our mission is straightforward, ensure that every child who walks through our doors has access to an excellent education.

5:56

Facilities are not incidental to that mission.

5:58

They are the infrastructure for it.

6:00

The council has been a partner in building that infrastructure.

6:03

Your prior approvals of bond issuances total well over $100 million, open across the district rates.

6:11

Interest rates that preserve dollars for teaching, learning, and student support rather than debt service.

6:18

We have a triple B stable bond rating and a demonstrated record of managing public resources effectively.

6:24

These bonds have never constituted a liability of the district, and that will remain true today.

6:30

The 90 million we're requesting serves two distinct purposes.

6:34

First, $65 million will refinance existing series 2016A bonds at lower current rates.

6:42

The resulting debt service savings will both free resources for direct investment in students and offset the carrying costs of the new capital financing that I will describe next.

6:52

So, second, 25 million will fund our most pressing capital needs.

6:58

The repairs and improvements we can no longer defer.

7:01

This includes HVAC systems, roofing, security infrastructure, and modernization of classrooms and instructional space across our oldest buildings, buildings that are nearing 30 years without a full renovation, along with the associated cost of issuance.

7:23

This bond financing allows us to address some of our most critical facility needs without further drawing down the operating resources our students depend on today.

7:33

And I do want to clarify our request is for renovation and refinancing, not for acquisition.

7:43

The data are clear that building conditions affect outcomes.

7:46

Schools with functional modernized facilities see measurable improvements in attendance, teacher retention, and academic performance.

7:54

Our students, the majority of whom are deemed at risk, deserve learning environments that reflect their worth and their potential.

8:02

The bonds will not constitute a debt or liability of the district.

8:05

Repayment is friendship's sole obligation.

8:08

Thus what we are asking for is the mechanism of issuance, not the money.

8:13

On behalf of our students, families, and educators, I thank the council for this opportunity and for your continued commitment to the children of Washington, D.C.

8:21

I welcome any questions you might have.

8:24

And for the record, I am joined here with borrowers' counsel, Darren Glimp of Oric, and also in the audience, we have Catherine Sanwo, our chief financial officer, and James Waller, our Chief of School Operations, in case you have any detailed questions.

8:39

Thank you.

8:39

Thank you, Miss Brantley.

8:41

Um I do have a few questions.

8:43

I'm probably going to ask similar questions for everyone who comes, every applicant who comes forward.

8:51

First question, is there any controversy around this that you know of?

8:55

I'm not aware of any controversy.

8:57

In fact, we've heard really positive results.

9:01

Essentially, every percent we save in interest or debt service annually amounts to over a million dollars in debt service savings.

9:11

So any opportunity like this one where we get to reduce our overall debt interest rate is a savings.

9:20

Second question.

9:21

Are there any changes to the legislation?

9:26

The only thing that I would clearly specify is that the total of up to 90 million is 65 million for refinance and 25 million for improvements, repair, and renovation of existing properties.

9:42

I think there was a mention of acquisition, which is not part of what we are doing with this bond financing.

9:48

Specifically, Minnesota.

9:49

Yes.

9:50

Specifically, you read an address of Minnesota Avenue.

9:53

That is not part of this request.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Economic Development█████████████████████████████████████████████86%
Engineering And Infrastructure████8%
Procedural██3%
Public Health2%
Affordable Housing1%
Summary of Proceedings

Council Roundtable Hearing on Revenue Bond Project Approvals - May 14, 2026

On May 14, 2026, the Council of the District of Columbia held a roundtable hearing to consider eight revenue bond project approval resolutions for nonprofit organizations. The hearing covered applications from charter schools, a senior living facility, a food assistance nonprofit, and university-affiliated housing projects. The record will close at 5:00 PM on May 18, 2026.

Discussion Items

  • Friendship Public Charter School (Pat Brantley): Requested up to $90 million in tax-exempt revenue bonds ($65 million refinancing of Series 2016A bonds, $25 million for capital improvements). No controversy. The resolution references acquisition of a Minnesota Avenue property, but that bid was rejected; a revised sources and uses table will be provided. Timing: closing scheduled for June 24, 2026; request approval by the first Tuesday in June legislative meeting.

  • DC Preparatory Academy (Nessa Gonzalez): Requested bonds for refinancing and renovation of a 42,000-square-foot facility. No controversy. Resolution is accurate with no changes needed. Timing: closing scheduled for June 17, 2026, with a target no later than June 30.

  • Food and Friends Inc. (Carrie Stoltzfus): Requested up to $15 million for capital improvements, equipment, and expansion of its facility. No controversy. Resolution is accurate. Timing: hope to be on the June 2 legislative agenda, with closing in mid-June and groundbreaking in mid-July.

  • Provident Group Bison Properties (Chris Hicks): Requested up to $575 million (increased from $432 million) to refund prior bonds, acquire additional dormitories, refinance Howard Manor bonds, and fund deferred maintenance. No controversy. Resolution requires amendment to reflect the increased amount and added properties; a redline draft was provided. Timing: documentation in progress, hope to close by end of summer.

  • St. Patrick's Episcopal Day School (Rebecca Kim): Requested up to $35.5 million (increased from $30.5 million) to refinance 2016 bonds and finance a new middle school. No controversy. Resolution needs change to the amount; a revised sources and uses table will be provided. Timing: close before the summer recess (July 15).

  • PRG Wonder Plaza Properties (Chris Hicks): Requested up to $375 million (increased from $350 million) for a mixed-use redevelopment for Howard University, including student housing, health and wellness center, and dining. No controversy. Resolution is correct as drafted. Timing: target end of July to start construction in August. A potential real property tax issue was discussed regarding the financing structure; the chairman suggested possible legislative language to clarify tax exemption.

  • Harmony DC Public Charter Schools (Dr. Muhammad Turkey): Requested up to $17 million for refinancing and capital improvements. No controversy. Resolution is accurate; no changes needed. Timing: to be determined, but chairman noted difficulty with June 2 agenda due to budget work.

  • Forest Hills of DC (representative not named in introduction): Requested up to $13.7 million to refinance existing debt and fund facility improvements (roof, windows, HVAC, etc.). No controversy. Resolution accurate; no changes needed. A sources and uses table will be provided. Timing: undetermined, but chairman noted June 2 agenda is difficult.

  • William Liggins, Director of the DC Revenue Bond Program: Testified in support of all applications, noting the program has facilitated over $5.1 billion in closed transactions since FY20. He confirmed no objection to the increased bond amounts for Bison Properties and St. Patrick's, and no objection to potential amendments addressing real property tax issues for Howard University projects.

Key Outcomes

  • The record will close at 5:00 PM on May 18, 2026. All applicants were asked to submit any revised documents (sources and uses tables, corrected resolutions, redlines) by that deadline.
  • The chairman indicated that the council may move the legislation as freestanding bills, as a package, or as part of the budget support act (which requires two votes on June 9 and June 23). Applicants with urgent timing (Friendship, DC Prep, Food and Friends) expressed preference for freestanding action to meet closing deadlines.
  • No formal votes were taken; the hearing was for testimony and information gathering.

Meeting Transcript

Um before the council acts on them. The record in this matter will close at four five p.m. on May 18th, 2026. So we have a lot of witnesses. Although I'm guessing it's probably about four or five percent. I think revenue bonds project approval reserve. Did you sign executive officer advisor and Darren Glimp, partner at ORC, Harrington and Sutcliffe LL table? I'm fine. And is Ms. Dalton here? Okay. Um, and uh for the record, you're Patricia. Otherwise known as Pat. Um please proceed. Good morning, Chairman Mendelssohn. I am Pat Brantley of Friendship Public Charter School. I'm here today to request the council's approval of up to 90 million in tax exempt revenue bonds, and to explain why this bond issuance is both warranted and prudent. Friendship is a 15 campus public charter school network serving 4,600 students and employing over 1,000 staff across wards four, five, six, seven, and eight. Our mission is straightforward, ensure that every child who walks through our doors has access to an excellent education. Facilities are not incidental to that mission. They are the infrastructure for it. The council has been a partner in building that infrastructure. Your prior approvals of bond issuances total well over $100 million, open across the district rates. Interest rates that preserve dollars for teaching, learning, and student support rather than debt service. We have a triple B stable bond rating and a demonstrated record of managing public resources effectively. These bonds have never constituted a liability of the district, and that will remain true today. The 90 million we're requesting serves two distinct purposes. First, $65 million will refinance existing series 2016A bonds at lower current rates. The resulting debt service savings will both free resources for direct investment in students and offset the carrying costs of the new capital financing that I will describe next. So, second, 25 million will fund our most pressing capital needs. The repairs and improvements we can no longer defer. This includes HVAC systems, roofing, security infrastructure, and modernization of classrooms and instructional space across our oldest buildings, buildings that are nearing 30 years without a full renovation, along with the associated cost of issuance. This bond financing allows us to address some of our most critical facility needs without further drawing down the operating resources our students depend on today. And I do want to clarify our request is for renovation and refinancing, not for acquisition. The data are clear that building conditions affect outcomes. Schools with functional modernized facilities see measurable improvements in attendance, teacher retention, and academic performance. Our students, the majority of whom are deemed at risk, deserve learning environments that reflect their worth and their potential. The bonds will not constitute a debt or liability of the district. Repayment is friendship's sole obligation. Thus what we are asking for is the mechanism of issuance, not the money. On behalf of our students, families, and educators, I thank the council for this opportunity and for your continued commitment to the children of Washington, D.C. I welcome any questions you might have. And for the record, I am joined here with borrowers' counsel, Darren Glimp of Oric, and also in the audience, we have Catherine Sanwo, our chief financial officer, and James Waller, our Chief of School Operations, in case you have any detailed questions. Thank you. Thank you, Miss Brantley. Um I do have a few questions. I'm probably going to ask similar questions for everyone who comes, every applicant who comes forward. First question, is there any controversy around this that you know of? I'm not aware of any controversy. In fact, we've heard really positive results.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com