OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Watauga, Texas/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Watauga City Council Workshop Meeting - July 27, 2026: Compensation Study and Safety Action Plan Updates

City Council — Monday, July 27, 2026
BodyWatauga, Texas
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, July 27, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:37:37

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:11

Call to order that we're talking city council workshop meeting Monday, July 27th, 2026, City Hall Council Chambers at 5 30 p.m.

0:22

First item of business roll call, place one.

Speaker 2

0:25

Thanks, Joe Born, President.

Speaker 1

0:27

Place two.

Speaker 3

0:29

Chris Blackburn present.

Speaker 1

0:31

Place three.

0:34

Place four.

0:36

Andrew Neal present.

0:38

Place five.

Speaker 4

0:39

Stephen Wilkes, present.

Speaker 5

0:41

Place six.

0:43

Mark Taylor here.

Speaker 1

0:46

Play seven.

0:48

Jan Hill, present.

0:50

And Mayor Artliner present.

Unassigned speaker

0:55

Ms.

Speaker 1

0:55

Prosky, any requests for public comment or public testimony?

0:59

Okay.

1:02

Number one, public sector personnel consultant presentation of the 2026 compensation study.

1:08

Ms.

1:08

Rodriguez.

Speaker 6

1:11

Yes, good evening, Council, Mayor, City Manager.

1:15

Today we're going to be going over the just a second.

Unassigned speaker

1:20

There

Speaker 1

1:21

we go.

Speaker 6

1:22

We are going to be going over our 2026 compensation study that we did for 2027 planning.

1:29

We have Matt Weatherly here from public sector personnel consultants to go over the results of that compensation study.

1:35

So I'll hand it over to him.

Unassigned speaker

1:38

Good

Speaker 7

1:38

evening, Mayor, members of council.

1:40

Appreciate the spot in front of you this evening.

1:43

Prepared an overview of our work.

1:55

We want to bring forth data to make good informed decisions when it comes time to budgeting, which I understand is kind of next week.

2:02

Yeah, so coming up, you know, fast and furious, we uh kind of collected data to allow your decision makers and your staff to plug into the budget any reactions necessary to honor any stated or desired compensation philosophy or policy.

2:17

We certainly want to fly a broader banner, recruitment, retention, uh, consistency, sustainability when it comes to what we do offer and budget for our staff salaries.

2:28

Our scope of work called for the conduct of a base salary survey, compensation survey update to a 2024 effort that we had undertaken.

2:38

Um so we do have some history with the city.

2:40

This is, I think maybe our third uh salary survey with the the city where we review your job descriptions up against the market.

2:48

We compare your salary structures uh to those that you are either in competition with and or have jobs like the city.

2:56

So we do that at a job by job level.

2:58

So I talk about that methodology.

3:01

We do compare pay structures first.

3:04

Uh the beauty in the public sector is that the neighboring cities, those that you're competing with, uh, have formal salary plans, it's public information.

3:12

We can match up job descriptions based on actual job duties uh and at least make some inferences about one, how are we doing compared to our market?

3:21

And the follow-up is kind of potentially part of this evening's conversation or any questions you might be able to, I might be able to answer.

3:28

Now, but where do we want to be?

3:29

Where do we need to be in order to retain our current staff and recruit new staff when we do have vacancies?

3:36

Historically, there's a list of 10 agencies plus the private sector where we have collected data.

3:42

We collect job descriptions, we collect salary plan information, we start to gather data, uh, really job by job, so that we understand where we are for our pay range that's afforded for each of our positions.

3:57

The uh data is you know, kind of aggregated position by position, so that I can at least start to look at how we're doing year over year, or in this case every two years, what data is collected?

4:09

The data that we collect is salary range information to begin with.

4:13

As I mentioned, most all of these comparison cities do have formal salary structures, either as part of a salary ordinance or as part of their budget documentation that lists out all of their job descriptions that affords us some insight into that starting rate, that top-out rate, and that full pay range that's afforded for each of the job descriptions across their organization.

4:36

Um we look at your actual salaries, um, there's some improvement.

4:41

So if I look year over year back to that 2024 survey, the great majority of your employees uh were a little bit lower in the range than they currently are.

4:51

Right now, uh you do benefit from employees having an average of about seven years with the city.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

So when I look at your payroll information, you've got some good longevity, some good tenure, and some good retention.

Speaker 7

5:05

The majority of those salaries, when I look at those average seven-year people, they're still not quite at midpoint.

5:12

But if I kind of break this salary structure or pay range for each job into half to begin with, I would say that I want to see things like merit, public safety step increases, those regular salary adjustments be plugged in when it's feasible and when it's affordable to keep salaries moving along your salary range structure.

5:36

When we do this modeling, we're basically bringing you back to midpoint.

5:40

So when we compare your pay structures, some interchangeable terms might look like market and average and midpoint, meaning the middle of your pay range is where I want to see kind of our journey level competent performers being paid.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Transportation Safety█████████████████████████████████████████████50%
Personnel Matters██████████████████████24%
Public Safety███████████12%
Budget Management█████5%
Public Engagement████4%
Procedural███3%
Engineering And Infrastructure█1%
Equity in Transportation█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Watauga City Council Workshop Meeting - July 27, 2026

The Watauga City Council held a workshop meeting on July 27, 2026, at 5:30 PM in City Hall Council Chambers. The meeting featured two presentations: the 2026 Compensation Study by Public Sector Personnel Consultants and an update on the Comprehensive Safety Action Plan by Burgess & Niple. Council members discussed findings, raised concerns, and outlined next steps for both items. No public comments were received.

Presentations

2026 Compensation Study

  • Presenter: Matt Weatherly, Public Sector Personnel Consultants, introduced by Juliet Rodriguez, HR Director.
  • Key findings: The study compared 90+ job descriptions against 10 agencies plus private sector. Compared to the 2024 study, the city has improved: 40% of jobs are now more than 5% below market (down from 88% in 2024). Average employee tenure is 7 years, but average salaries are 12% below midpoint.
  • Proposed adjustments: Move certain jobs to higher pay grades (e.g., animal control officer from Grade 20 to 21) to bring all jobs within 5% of market. For civil service, a market adjustment (estimated ~$200,000 for 3% increase) plus cost-of-living adjustments (0-3%) and continued merit/step increases are recommended.
  • Fiscal impact: Approximately $26,000 (plus benefits) to bring 10 general government employees up to new minimums; additional costs for civil service adjustments and COL/merit/step increases total about $225,000 for the study recommendations.
  • Council discussion: Councilman Taylor questioned why average civil service salary is 12% below midpoint given 7-year tenure; he and others stressed the need to keep up with inflation and cost of living. Councilwoman Hill noted that scales continually lag behind. Councilman Neal clarified that the $26,000 figure is the annualized cost for the 10 employees below minimum, not individual pay. No part-time positions were included. Council indicated support for budget allocations to address pay gaps.

Comprehensive Safety Action Plan

  • Presenter: Robert Packwin, Burgess & Niple, introduced by Randy Richards, Assistant Public Works Director.
  • Background: The city received a $200,000 FHWA grant in 2024 for a safety action plan; the 24-month performance period ends November 2026. The plan aims for zero fatalities and serious injuries by 2055 with an interim 35% reduction by 2035.
  • Crash data (2019-2024): 4 fatalities, 26 serious injuries, approximately 97 crashes per year. Top contributing factors: intersection-related, speed, lane departure, distracted driving. US 377 crashes (40% of all city crashes) were analyzed separately due to state control.
  • High-risk locations: 7% of roadway miles account for 60% of crashes; top 20 segments (quarter-mile each) identified. Also, 31 intersections with elevated risk (overrepresented crashes).
  • Public engagement: 317 survey responses, 62 interactive map pins, booth at Wataugafest (25 in-person engagements). Top voted vision statement: "A great place to live, a safe place to thrive."
  • Recommendations: $1.33 million in low-cost countermeasures (curb realignments, pavement markings, rectangular rapid flashing beacons, crosswalks, intersection visibility enhancements, new sidewalks, and street lighting). Also suggested: neighborhood traffic calming program, on-street parking compliance study, and continued enforcement.
  • Council discussion: Council members raised concerns about driver behavior (Councilwoman Hill: "How do you fix stupid?"), enforcement limitations, and funding. Councilman Taylor recalled past median proposals on Denton Highway (not favored by neighboring cities). Councilman Blackburn worried about the price tag (equivalent to 7-10 police cars or a fire truck). Councilwoman Downey questioned the effectiveness of dynamic speed feedback signs (they become background noise) and advocated narrowing streets and other low-cost measures. Councilman Neal asked about speed tables and roundabouts; staff noted roundabouts could be funded under potential new federal surface transportation bill.
  • Equity considerations: 55% of severe crashes occur in five low-to-moderate-income block groups; 68% of proposed countermeasure costs would benefit those areas.

Key Outcomes

  • Compensation Study: No formal action taken. Data will inform the upcoming FY2027 budget discussions. Council expressed support for merit and step increases but stressed the need to address inflation. Staff will continue budget conversations.
  • Safety Action Plan: Council will review the full plan (over 100 pages) and provide feedback to the city manager by late August. A resolution to approve the plan will be placed on the second council meeting in August 2026 for possible consent agenda adoption. Staff will work with Burgess & Niple to incorporate any council amendments.
  • Future funding: The city will monitor federal surface transportation reauthorization (possible $500 million first year for SS4A program) for implementation grants.
  • Traffic enforcement: Police Chief indicated continued emphasis on traffic stops (aiming for 13,000-15,000 per year). No red-light cameras were discussed; cameras remain unpopular.

Meeting Transcript

Call to order that we're talking city council workshop meeting Monday, July 27th, 2026, City Hall Council Chambers at 5 30 p.m. First item of business roll call, place one. Thanks, Joe Born, President. Place two. Chris Blackburn present. Place three. Place four. Andrew Neal present. Place five. Stephen Wilkes, present. Place six. Mark Taylor here. Play seven. Jan Hill, present. And Mayor Artliner present. Ms. Prosky, any requests for public comment or public testimony? Okay. Number one, public sector personnel consultant presentation of the 2026 compensation study. Ms. Rodriguez. Yes, good evening, Council, Mayor, City Manager. Today we're going to be going over the just a second. There we go. We are going to be going over our 2026 compensation study that we did for 2027 planning. We have Matt Weatherly here from public sector personnel consultants to go over the results of that compensation study. So I'll hand it over to him. Good evening, Mayor, members of council. Appreciate the spot in front of you this evening. Prepared an overview of our work. We want to bring forth data to make good informed decisions when it comes time to budgeting, which I understand is kind of next week. Yeah, so coming up, you know, fast and furious, we uh kind of collected data to allow your decision makers and your staff to plug into the budget any reactions necessary to honor any stated or desired compensation philosophy or policy. We certainly want to fly a broader banner, recruitment, retention, uh, consistency, sustainability when it comes to what we do offer and budget for our staff salaries. Our scope of work called for the conduct of a base salary survey, compensation survey update to a 2024 effort that we had undertaken. Um so we do have some history with the city. This is, I think maybe our third uh salary survey with the the city where we review your job descriptions up against the market. We compare your salary structures uh to those that you are either in competition with and or have jobs like the city. So we do that at a job by job level. So I talk about that methodology. We do compare pay structures first. Uh the beauty in the public sector is that the neighboring cities, those that you're competing with, uh, have formal salary plans, it's public information. We can match up job descriptions based on actual job duties uh and at least make some inferences about one, how are we doing compared to our market? And the follow-up is kind of potentially part of this evening's conversation or any questions you might be able to, I might be able to answer. Now, but where do we want to be? Where do we need to be in order to retain our current staff and recruit new staff when we do have vacancies? Historically, there's a list of 10 agencies plus the private sector where we have collected data. We collect job descriptions, we collect salary plan information, we start to gather data, uh, really job by job, so that we understand where we are for our pay range that's afforded for each of our positions. The uh data is you know, kind of aggregated position by position, so that I can at least start to look at how we're doing year over year, or in this case every two years, what data is collected?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com