Give me one second here.

Um, it is 601, so we will call to order the Monday, March 9th meeting of the ordinance and licensing committee.

All committee members are present, so we do have a quorum.

Uh moving on to public comment.

Anyone public comment?

Chief.

No, no, no, no.

Okay.

Maybe they hear it.

Okay.

All right.

Uh moving on from public comment since no one else is in the uh gallery.

Approval of minutes.

Anyone have any concerns with the uh objections to the minutes as they're presented?

Seeing none, we will consider the minutes approved by unanimous consent.

Moving on to licenses, um invited bartenders.

Uh we only have one person on the list.

Um, sorry, let me pull it up so I get it correct.

Um we only have Sarah Evans on the list.

Um she has not attended, but based on her history and the time period uh between when uh a few things were on her record, and uh you know enough time has passed between that and now so I will make a motion to approve the uh bartender's license for Sarah Evans and I'll second.

Okay, so we have a motion to approve the operator's license for Sarah Evans uh motion by myself, seconded by all the person Halvin's laban.

You can vote when it's before you vote.

And we're doing some training here, so this might take a minute that passes unanimously.

My computer now needs a restart.

Moving on to our next agenda item.

Uh we have other applications.

Um want to make a motion on these, we can approve them all at once.

Yeah, I will make the motion to approve the applications for discount smokes and spirits, class A beer and liquor retail for the story LLC extension of premises, the steaming cup sidewalk cafe, and tofties table sidewalk cafe.

I'll second.

All right, perfect.

We have a motion to approve by Alder Person Halvin's laban, seconded by Alder Person Manion.

The uh licenses for discount smokes and spirits, class A beer and liquor retail for the story LLC extension of premises, the steaming cup sidewalk cafe, and Tofty's table sidewalk cafe.

You can vote when it's before you.

Uh moving on, discussion recommendation, adoption of Wisconsin statute 349.115 into municipal code regarding the impounding of vehicles used in reckless driving.

Uh Brian Michael, yes, good evening.

Uh assistant city attorney Michael Radovich.

Uh, my office did get a referral regarding uh adopting the statute into our code.

The statute had been amended by the state legislature recently, making some changes.

Uh so I submitted a memorandum to the council.

I'm happy to discuss any questions that you may have.

How soon can we implement this?

I was reading in the newspaper about uh a couple other incidences and other communities.

So as soon as possible.

Thank you.

Well, I mean it would be this is the first reading tonight.

There'll be a second reading at the next council meeting, and they will have uh the option at that point to suspend the rule requiring the third reading.

And uh ordinance changes or or ordinances are effective the day after they are published.

So as soon as we can get it published in the Freeman, the next day is when it will actually take effect and can be enforced.

Any other questions from anybody?

We made Michael stay late to present to us, so I am happy to do so, and I guess I will let you guys know uh there is a minor error in subsection 7A, so that will be slightly different next meeting.

Uh it will read something along the lines of the city shall return the vehicle when they when all costs and towing and storage is paid.

So I do apologize for that.

I wouldn't call it an error, but we are going to add language in there that kind of restates the obvious that if the payment is made, then the car will be returned.

It's just language to put an affirmative duty on the city to return the car if everything is paid, which I think is implied.

You can read between the lines, but we're going to make it explicit.

Okay.

Chief, do you have or Chief?

Do you have any perspectives on this concerns?

I do I fully support it.

I think it's gonna say otherwise I'm gonna have to repeat it, so it's easier if you just come up and no, I truly believe that reckless driving is a public safety threat.