The Waukesha Plan Commission met on Wednesday, May 27, 2026, at 6:00 PM in City Hall Council Chambers. All members were present except Commissioner RG Keller (excused). The commission approved consent items, held public hearings on two conditional use permits, reviewed several site plans and survey maps, and recommended declaring five water utility properties as surplus.
All right, it is six o'clock. So I will call the Wednesday, May 27th, 2026 meeting of the Plan Commission to order. Please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. And to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God. Indivisible with liberty and justice for all. All right. Roll call. All members of the committee are present except for RG Keller who has an excused absence. So we do have a quorum. Next up is public comment. Is there anyone for public comment today? Coming up. And Lisa, I'm sure you know the drill. Thank you. Thank you. Lisa Sell, 434 Madison Street. I am here to just ask a few questions and give a little bit of input for the declaring the surplus land for the water utility. So it looks like 1.7 acres is along Delafield Street, so uh right to the south of us here. And I don't know if you had a chance to take a look at it, but it's such a quaint um the corner little piece of property. It has um the field stone, it has the little hut, it even has a birdbath still out there. And um it's just it used to have the dome, and the t-shirt that I had here was Save the Dome. That was in 1986, but it was 86 in 86. And so even back then that the landmarks commission was trying to preserve some of that site. Now we are not against um development of the property at all. We're just hoping that maybe something could go in there, like a coffee shop or a restaurant or something that could keep the the history of that with the beautiful property uh still intact. Um we have we have the Blair House, um, then we would have that piece, and then across the street at 139, that's also um on the a local landmark. Um that's the uh family promise used to be image keepers building. So you have these historic properties um in a row, and we really would like to see uh if you could put something in there that would fit um in with the neighborhood. Also, uh we were wondering it was kind of hard. The map that was attached to the agenda was quite blurry, but um, it looks like uh that the property uh continues under our our bridge, our newer bridge. And so I'm wondering if you could address that, um, if it could be split off or whatever, just to make sure that our bridge would never be in danger. I'm sure you'll you'll take that into consideration. And then um just last year in August, there was an amendment to F 15, which is the disposition of surplus property. And I just wanted to read that, and it says it is the city's policy that surplus city property is disposed of in ways that ensure the city assets are not disposed of when they could be reused. Um, ensure the most efficient use of city assets, maximize financial return for the city, and prevent improper use or acquisition of the city property by city employees. And so um it and then it goes on to say that it well, it used to say that it had to go to all the of the departments in the city, and they had to say that they didn't need it. And it was switched in August to just say that just the head of that department is the one who says it. But I wonder with all of that parking right there under the bridge, couldn't that be used by a department in the city? It certainly seems like it could be to me, so I don't know if that was asked. Um, but from this point, uh it's the plan commission that would approve declaring it all as surplus, and then it goes to common council. So it kind of um it's in your court as to how this surplus is declared. So I would just ask that you would take a look at that and please try to preserve our cute little um area that we have down there. Thank you. Thank you. Is there anyone else for public comment? All right, then moving right along. We have approval of minutes from our April 22nd meeting. Is there a motion?