Weatherford Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Session – June 10, 2026
Weatherford Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Session – June 10, 2026
The Weatherford Planning & Zoning Commission held its regular session on Wednesday, June 10, 2026, at 2:30 PM in the City Council Chambers. The meeting covered a conditional use permit for a hotel, postponement of another item due to a notification error, and two zoning map amendments from commercial to residential. All votes were unanimous.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of Minutes (Item 2a): The minutes from the May 13, 2026 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting were approved unanimously on a motion by Vice Chair John Hinton, seconded by Member Sharon Hayes.
Discussion Items
- Item 3a – Conditional Use Permit for Cotton Bratton Hotel (CUP-26-0004): Staff presented a request for a conditional use permit to operate a 14-room hotel constructed from shipping containers on a 0.517-acre tract at 117 College Avenue. The property is zoned Central Business District. A previous CUP for the same hotel had expired because construction was not completed within 20 months. Since then, the applicant (ATH Hotel Group) has made improvements including a new sidewalk, decorative screening wall, and landscaping. The new proposal includes painting the containers to comply with downtown design guidelines and installing landscape screening on southern, western, and eastern elevations. Staff recommended approval with five conditions: (1) landscape screening along portions of east, west, and all of south elevations; (2) painting shipping containers to comply with zoning; (3) no murals or decorative paintings on containers; (4) removal of all shipping containers within 60 days if hotel use ceases for 180 consecutive days; (5) CUP void if certificate of occupancy not issued within 18 months. Commissioner Kathy Wylie questioned the enforceability of condition #4 regarding removal of 14 containers. The applicant explained that they would be incentivized to remove the containers if the hotel ceased operation, and that they could block off the courtyard and remove them. Chair Dr. Joshua Tarbay noted that the condition could be adjusted. After a public hearing with no speakers, the commission voted unanimously to approve the CUP as recommended.
- Item 3b – Postponement of Zoning and CUP Request for 1798 NW Ric Williamson (ZCH-26-0008 & CUP-26-0005): The chair announced that this item had a notification error and would be postponed to the July 8, 2026 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting and the July 28, 2026 City Council meeting. A public hearing was opened and closed with no speakers; no action was taken.
- Item 3c – Zoning Map Amendment from C1 to R1 at 202 South Tower Street (ZCH-26-0009): Staff presented a request by Debbie Howard to rezone a 0.459-acre tract from C1 General Commercial to R1 One-Family Residential. The property is currently used as a home, and the rezoning would align the zoning with actual use, helping the owner sell the property. Staff recommended approval. Commissioner Wayne Garrett asked if the property is currently used as a residence; the applicant confirmed. After a public hearing with no speakers, the commission voted unanimously to approve.
- Item 3d – General Plan and Zoning Map Amendment from C1 to R1 at 114 South Tower Street (ZCH-26-0009): Staff presented a similar request by Debbie Howard for a 0.226-acre tract also from C1 to R1. The property is also used as a residence. The future land use would change to residential to match the requested zone. Staff recommended approval. Commissioner Terry Hughes asked if these adjacent properties might be part of a broader area needing rezoning; staff noted the area is unique but that honoring the residential use was appropriate. Chair Tarbay commented that rezoning from commercial to residential is less concerning than the reverse. After a public hearing with no speakers, the commission voted unanimously to approve.
Key Outcomes
- Item 3a: Approved unanimously (7-0) with staff-recommended conditions. The CUP allows the Cotton Bratton Hotel to proceed with shipping container construction and includes a 180-day cessation clause for container removal.
- Item 3b: Postponed to July 8, 2026 due to a notification error. No action taken.
- Item 3c: Approved unanimously (7-0) to rezone 202 South Tower Street from C1 to R1.
- Item 3d: Approved unanimously (7-0) to rezone 114 South Tower Street from C1 to R1 and amend the General Plan accordingly.
The meeting adjourned at 2:56 PM.
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon and welcome to the regular session of the City of Weatherford Planning and Zoning Commission. Today is Wednesday, June 10th, 2026. I am Chair Dr. Joshua Tarbe, and I call this meeting to order at 2 30 p.m. and announce that a quorum is present. Before we begin working through today's agenda, I'd like to remind all applicants and interested parties that cases considered by this commission today will also be considered by the city council. City Council agendas are posted at the City Hall at least three business days prior to meetings. City Council agendas can also be found on the City of Weatherford website at www.weatherfordtexas.gov backslash meetings. Board first item on the agenda is item 2A, that is approval of the meeting minutes. That's to consider approval of the minutes of the planning and zoning commission meeting held May 13th, 2026. We have a motion to accept the minutes by Mr. Hinton and a second by that away from me a little quick and change. Who is it? Miss Hayes, second by Miss Hayes. Yeah. All those in favor, please designate yay or nay on your screen. Motion passes unanimously. The minutes are approved. Item 3A, we're now entering into our regular agenda items, is to hold a public hearing to consider a request for a conditional use permit regarding hotel motel use on a 0.517 acre tract of land located at 117 College Avenue, City of Weatherford, Parker County, Texas, CUP-26-0004. Ms. Johnson. Thank you, Chairman. The request before you is going to be for a conditional use permit for the Cotton Bratton Hotel at 117 College Avenue. This property is currently zoned central business district, which you can see on the screen. The conditional use permit is going to be to operate a hotel on this property. And for some background, there was a conditional use permit for this same hotel that was previously approved about three years ago. Part of the conditions on that permit was to complete construction within 20 months, which was not met. Because of that, their permit has expired, which requires them to come back through that approval process. And this slide is showing the current conditions of the property. Since the previous permit approval, the applicant has done several improvements to the site under that was required under the previous conditional use permit. Some of those improvements are going to be removing the existing drive approach, a new sidewalk. They installed a decorative screening wall with some landscaping, and then they also made improvements to the adjacent building. The project consists of a 14-room hotel that will be constructed using shipping containers. Those containers will be about 19 feet in height. There will be a courtyard with a pool as well. The applicant is proposing to paint the containers that either matches the adjacent building or another collar that will comply with our design guidelines for downtown. There will also be a landscape screening installed along the southern, western, and the southern, western, and the eastern sides of the container to help reduce visitability from the street. This slide is going to show a few examples of what that screening looks like along with an example of those hotel rooms. Staff does recommend approval of this conditional use permit subject to the following conditions. I'm here if you have any questions, and the applicant's also here as well, and they do have a presentation. Thank you. Monica Board. Yeah, of course. In the event the hotel use ceases operation for a period of 180 days. Consecutive days that the shipping container structures will be removed. Yes. So my question is is there a mechanism in place that would for removing these 14 containers if this were to come to pass that it ceased operation? So my question is is there a mechanism in place that would um for removing these 14 containers if this were to come to pass that it ceased operation and if that's the case who would be responsible for it would be the owner of the property the owner the owner of the property would be responsible for removing them. We would contact them if this were to occur. Okay, it just seems like it's all fully integrated that that would be a major project to come back and remove them all.
openpublica.com