OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Weathersfield, Vermont/Selectboard
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Weathersfield Select Board Meeting - September 15, 2026

Selectboard — Tuesday, September 15, 2026
BodyWeathersfield, Vermont
SessionSelectboard
DateTuesday, September 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:46:53

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:10

Sometimes that computer just needs to sit in the setting.

0:17

It's kind of cool.

0:18

Yeah.

0:20

I don't I'm only the theater.

0:23

Well, you keep that's not.

0:26

I know I could tell you.

0:37

Yeah.

0:41

All right.

0:42

Well, welcome to the it's uh September.

0:47

Sorry, I just saw the day August.

0:50

So today is September 14th.

0:52

Well, the select board meeting.

0:54

Um, and my apologies for the delay.

0:57

We've had a little uh electric electronic um glitch, but oh um, so the time is 6 34 uh rated to the event.

1:12

Um order, um would anyone like to leave the pledge this evening short?

1:26

The United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

1:38

Okay.

1:41

Uh and uh agenda do you have a copy if we put another copy of the agenda?

1:49

Uh so is there uh a motion to amend uh waiting, you may put the agenda is there we go.

2:13

Okay, so uh the for the agenda review um with you all having in front of you.

2:20

Are there any amendments to be made or change or order anything in the agenda this evening?

2:28

Uh my question the lead, the budget committee has an additional two vacancies that we learned of.

2:33

Uh do we have to amend that?

2:35

Uh I think well we can make well taken.

2:40

We have talked about it.

2:42

Yes.

2:43

Um but it doesn't require change in the agenda.

2:47

All right.

2:48

Uh you have one thing on it.

2:51

Um other business is not on there.

2:54

I know that uh in the previous meeting it was removed to shorten it a little bit, but I think it might be pertinent if we do keep it on the agenda because you never know what we're gonna end up in at the end of the meeting and what rabbit holes we've ended up on, and it could be useful or a very quick item to go through.

3:13

Max, may I address that?

3:16

Max.

3:18

So that was partially driven by me.

3:19

I'll I'll take some ownership on that.

3:21

The concern was to be taking action on things that are not on the agenda that has been done in the past.

3:26

Is there is there a way to have that on there and avoid the taking action because people should be duly warned of what's on the agenda?

3:35

That's a very good question.

3:36

Uh so my I appreciate the clarity on that too.

3:39

Now understanding where it was coming from on that.

3:41

I I just want to so I just want to make sure we're transparent with the people, not only the people of the town, but also the department heads.

3:47

I don't want something to come up that's highway related after I told the highway superintendent he doesn't need to be present at the meeting.

3:54

And now he's not here to explain it, and we're and we're down that rabbit hole.

3:58

Um I might recommend if it's if it makes sense, and I don't know if it does.

4:03

Comments not on the agenda.

4:05

Is that a place to bring things up that you want to see on the next agenda so that when we sit with the chair, we can do that, or does that not suffice that request?

4:14

Uh I I was only bringing it up simply because it had been on there for so long, and rarely, but sometimes things that come up in it.

4:22

Uh it's definitely not something I want to get hung up on for very long at all.

4:26

So just the clarity on it is enough for me, so I appreciate that.

4:35

I'd like some clarification about agenda review because um typically, I mean, we're going back a ways, but the chair of design would just look at the agenda.

4:45

It was never really an item on the agenda per se.

4:48

What it would happen would be if somebody came in and they invited move them up to the front of the meeting, so they would they would then it was on the agenda, but the chair always had like if it was number seven, you'd say, okay, I want to move this up to number one without objection, that's fine.

5:03

But you can't add you could I heard you say a minute ago, I want to make an amendment to the agenda.

5:09

The agenda's been posted hours ago.

5:12

Right.

5:12

I just the only thing on the agenda would be what's wrong.

5:15

So there's been some confusion on some other committees that way, though.

5:20

Because all of a sudden somebody will add something to go wait a second.

5:23

So I don't know that you need that in the past, but she has always just looked around to the audience and said, wait a second, there's somebody here to speak early, and rather than let them go to the end.

5:33

Right.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████29%
Fiscal Sustainability█████████████████████████████29%
Capital Planning██████████10%
Waste Management█████████9%
Public Safety█████5%
Health Insurance████4%
Municipal Management███3%
Personnel Matters███3%
Water And Wastewater Management██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Weathersfield Select Board Meeting - September 15, 2026

The Weathersfield Select Board met on September 15, 2026, at 6:34 PM. The meeting covered approval of multiple sets of minutes, financial reports for FY26, establishment of a budget timeline for FY28, appointments to committees, and various operational updates. Key financial challenges were highlighted, including a growing deficit in the solid waste fund and an overspend in the highway fund.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Lisa Slate (Sunset Boulevard resident) alerted the board to a proposed water district boundary adjustment affecting properties in the village of Scotney, urging the board to monitor the prudential committee's discussion at their upcoming meeting.
  • Several announcements were made: the Weathersfield Conversation Group's second annual summit on September 20th at 1 PM at the Perkinsville School; the PTO's "Paw Drop" at Weathersfield School on September 15th from 5-8 PM (free admission).
  • A board member requested adding quarterly department head reports to future agendas to increase transparency, noting that monthly reports might be excessive.

Discussion Items

  • Approval of Minutes: The board spent considerable time correcting minutes from July 21, July 23, and July 27, 2026. After extensive debate, amendments were made to accurately reflect that Mrs. Burse seconded a motion and added language about the select board serving as interim town managers. The corrected minutes for July 21, July 23, July 27, August 4, August 13, August 24, and August 31 were all approved individually. A concern was raised that several sets of minutes on the website are still labeled "draft" and need to be updated.
  • Treasurer's Report (Steve): The preliminary FY26 (year ending June 30, 2026) unaudited reports were presented. The highway fund planned to use $102,500 of fund balance but actually ran a deficit of $180,879 due to $35,000 in unanticipated winter sand expenses, $35,000 in vehicle repairs, and a $31,000 principal and interest payment for an excavator loan that was not budgeted. The solid waste fund had a planned deficit reduction of $29,945 but instead incurred a $40,432 deficit, leading to an estimated cumulative deficit of $195,000-$200,000. Reasons included a $53,000 shortfall in punch card sales and $80,000 in recycling costs (recycling is free but costs money to haul away). The general fund broke even, preserving its $30,000 planned fund balance use. The board expressed concern about the solid waste deficit and the need for corrective action.
  • Budget Timeline for FY28: The board adopted a proposed timeline for the FY28 budget development, with goals to be discussed at future meetings. The timeline includes department budget development (Sept 15-Oct 6), a health care study presentation (Oct 13), health insurance decision (Oct 26), COLA study and decision (Nov 9), draft budget release (Nov 23), public input (Dec 14 and 28), budget approval (Jan 11, 2027), and town meeting warning (Jan 25). The board discussed using FY26 actuals as a starting point rather than FY27 budget, and emphasized the need to address highway and police department funding, fund capital reserves, and maintain a rainy day fund. The motion to adopt the timeline passed.
  • Town Manager Report (Suzanne): The town manager hiring process was updated. The job posting will be corrected and released; applications will be reviewed starting October 15th. A weekly call with the recruitment firm (Gary Evans) will monitor applicant interest. The board members will have access to see all applicants. The police building lease discussion was raised but deferred to a future agenda. The fire department is preparing an RFP for a brush truck approved by voters, and a live burn training is scheduled for October 2nd at 162 Quarry Road.
  • Appointments: The budget committee had three vacancies (one long-standing, two from resignations over the weekend). The board appointed John Broker Campbell and Jacob Chase to fill two of the three seats. For the planning commission, Jacob Chase was appointed to a term expiring March 2029, despite concerns about him serving on multiple boards (he also serves on the DRB and is a select board member). Todd Heninger, who had applied for the planning commission, expressed disappointment and noted his intention to step down from the DRB.
  • Warrants: The warrants for September 14, 2026, were approved: General fund payroll $22,923.76 and operating expenses $74,818.71; Highway fund payroll $10,248.38 and operating expenses $37,621.99; Solid waste payroll $2,348.16 and operating expenses $29,060.71; Library payroll $272.07 and operating expenses $300.30; plus a Route 106 screen bank repayer item of $108,995.63. Grand total payroll $38,222.37, operating expenses $250,797.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved corrected minutes for July 21, July 23, July 27, August 4, August 13, August 24, and August 31, 2026, with amendments to accurately record motions and seconds.
  • Appointed Suzanne Terrell as interim delinquent tax collector until a new town manager is hired (unanimous).
  • Adopted the FY28 budget development timeline as presented.
  • Appointed John Broker Campbell and Jacob Chase to the budget committee.
  • Appointed Jacob Chase to the planning commission for a term expiring March 2029.
  • Approved warrants totaling $38,222.37 payroll and $250,797 operating expenses.
  • Noted that the solid waste fund deficit has reached an estimated $195,000-$200,000, requiring potential borrowing and operational changes.

Meeting Transcript

Sometimes that computer just needs to sit in the setting. It's kind of cool. Yeah. I don't I'm only the theater. Well, you keep that's not. I know I could tell you. Yeah. All right. Well, welcome to the it's uh September. Sorry, I just saw the day August. So today is September 14th. Well, the select board meeting. Um, and my apologies for the delay. We've had a little uh electric electronic um glitch, but oh um, so the time is 6 34 uh rated to the event. Um order, um would anyone like to leave the pledge this evening short? The United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Okay. Uh and uh agenda do you have a copy if we put another copy of the agenda? Uh so is there uh a motion to amend uh waiting, you may put the agenda is there we go. Okay, so uh the for the agenda review um with you all having in front of you. Are there any amendments to be made or change or order anything in the agenda this evening? Uh my question the lead, the budget committee has an additional two vacancies that we learned of. Uh do we have to amend that? Uh I think well we can make well taken. We have talked about it. Yes. Um but it doesn't require change in the agenda. All right. Uh you have one thing on it. Um other business is not on there. I know that uh in the previous meeting it was removed to shorten it a little bit, but I think it might be pertinent if we do keep it on the agenda because you never know what we're gonna end up in at the end of the meeting and what rabbit holes we've ended up on, and it could be useful or a very quick item to go through. Max, may I address that? Max. So that was partially driven by me. I'll I'll take some ownership on that. The concern was to be taking action on things that are not on the agenda that has been done in the past. Is there is there a way to have that on there and avoid the taking action because people should be duly warned of what's on the agenda? That's a very good question. Uh so my I appreciate the clarity on that too. Now understanding where it was coming from on that. I I just want to so I just want to make sure we're transparent with the people, not only the people of the town, but also the department heads. I don't want something to come up that's highway related after I told the highway superintendent he doesn't need to be present at the meeting. And now he's not here to explain it, and we're and we're down that rabbit hole. Um I might recommend if it's if it makes sense, and I don't know if it does. Comments not on the agenda. Is that a place to bring things up that you want to see on the next agenda so that when we sit with the chair, we can do that, or does that not suffice that request? Uh I I was only bringing it up simply because it had been on there for so long, and rarely, but sometimes things that come up in it. Uh it's definitely not something I want to get hung up on for very long at all. So just the clarity on it is enough for me, so I appreciate that. I'd like some clarification about agenda review because um typically, I mean, we're going back a ways, but the chair of design would just look at the agenda.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com