OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission Meeting - May 10, 2018

Historic Preservation CommissionThursday, May 10, 2018
BodyWilmington, North Carolina
SessionHistoric Preservation Commission
DateThursday, May 10, 2018
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:10

Good evening.

0:10

I would like to go ahead and call the Thursday, May 10th, 2018 meeting of the City of Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission to order.

0:18

Thank you all for coming.

0:19

We appreciate your interest.

0:25

Hearings before the Historic Preservation Commission are quasi-judicial in nature.

0:30

This is a design review process to determine if the proposed project is congruent with the historic aspects and special character of the historic district or landmark.

0:39

Decisions of the Commission are based on the record of these proceedings, the Wilmington Design Guidelines for historic districts and landmarks, and the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation.

0:50

Evidence submitted to the Commission for review becomes part of the record.

0:54

Appeals of commission decisions are to the Wilmington Board of Adjustment and then to Superior Court and are based on the record.

1:01

Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date of the commission's action.

1:05

Public comment is heard during the public comment portion of the agenda item.

1:09

Those who want to address the commission are sworn in as witnesses.

1:13

The chair recognizes those who want to address the commission during the public hearing.

1:18

Comments should be directed to the commission to ensure that all comments are properly recorded.

1:24

Please come to the podum podium to address the commission, state your name and address, and speak clearly.

1:31

At this time, I'd like to request that all cell phones be either turned off or put on silence mode.

1:37

Thank you.

1:43

Daniel will start with you.

1:45

Daniel Hill.

1:46

John Muzzy.

1:48

Rob Romero.

1:49

Hey.

1:50

Lynn Boney.

1:52

Edward McCaleb.

1:54

Joan Keston.

1:56

We are also joined this evening by the Founding City staff members, Don Snotherly, Historic Preservation Planner.

2:02

Tamra Mercer, Planning Coordinator, Jeff Walton, Associate Planner, and Melissa Iverson Hales, Assistant City Attorney.

2:12

At this time, if there is anyone in attendance that wishes to speak and has not already been sworn in, please stand.

2:20

Uh oh.

2:26

Tamra, would you please swear them in?

2:29

Excuse me.

2:31

Do you affirm that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

2:36

I do.

2:36

Thank you.

2:40

Okay, we have six items on the agenda this evening to discuss.

2:46

Correct.

2:47

Yes.

2:49

Madam Chair, um, we have one applicant who um applicant at 1820 Market Street that would request that his item be moved to the first item of consideration.

3:03

Um he's got school age children here, and uh there's probably some homework that needs to be done.

3:10

So I would imagine I take no objection.

3:12

Are there any others that okay?

3:15

All right.

3:16

We will move that item to the first one on the agenda.

3:20

Would staff like to go ahead and present that.

3:36

Oh, there we go.

3:39

All right.

3:40

Um built in uh 1910, the LW Moore House is a frame colonial revival style dwelling.

3:48

The exterior is covered with aluminum siding.

3:52

The first and longtime owner Moore was a prominent local realtor and insurance agent.

3:58

The dwelling is a contributing structure in the Carolina Heights Winoca Terrace Historic District Overlay.

4:05

Only that which can be seen from the public right-of-way, excluding alleys, is subject to design review by the Historic Preservation Commission.

4:15

The applicant proposes to install a four-foot high aluminum fence with gates in the front yard.

4:23

As you see in this drawing, um, along Market Street, South 9th Street, 19th Street, and along the western property line.

4:32

The applicant also proposes to install a six-foot-tall aluminum fence in the rear yard.

4:37

The existing wood fence would remain along the rear alley.

4:43

Both the fencing and entry gate would be visible from both market and south 19th streets.

4:49

The installation of all fences on corner lots must be reviewed by the HPC to ensure the fences will not negatively impact the historic character of the neighboring structures.

5:00

Corner fencing exists along all three properties adjacent to the site at the intersection of Market Street and 19th Street.

5:08

Within the uh 1800 block of Market Street, aluminum fences uh fencing is the primary material use in three properties within that block face.

5:20

If the HPC elects to issue a COA for this request, the staff has provided recommendations for the consideration.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Architectural Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████50%
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████28%
Public Engagement██████7%
Procedural████4%
Affordable Housing███3%
Community Engagement██2%
Energy Efficiency██2%
Fence Regulations1%
Tree Preservation1%
Summary of Proceedings

Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission Meeting - May 10, 2018

The Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission met on Thursday, May 10, 2018, at 5:30 p.m., in City Council Chambers for a quasi-judicial design-review hearing. Seven commission members were present and witnesses were sworn in before testimony. The commission heard six new-business items, approved four exterior-alteration requests and one fencing request with conditions, and continued one roof-replacement request. Two discrepancies should be noted: the agenda lists the meeting location as City Council Chambers, Skyline Center, 929 North Front Street, while the minutes state the meeting was at 102 North 3rd Street; and the agenda packet records several votes as 9-0, while the minutes reflect seven members present and 7-0 tallies. This summary follows the minutes.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • 1820 Market Street: Applicant Eric Hawthorne said the high-traffic corner, pedestrian traffic, and a nearby bus stop made the fence necessary to keep his young children in the yard and provide separation from the street. No public comments were offered for or against.
  • 323 South 4th Street: Applicant Alyson Fleming described the goal of restoring a divided house to single-family use and making the rear addition congruous with the ca. 1850 Sutton-Burgwin House. Scott Oudon of B&O Design explained the proposed wall repair, neutral color, arbor, skylights, and brick stairs. No public comments were offered for or against.
  • 209 South 5th Avenue: Applicant Lane Patterson said she and her husband had invested substantial time and money in the house and could not afford synthetic slate. She reported four contractor quotes, with real slate about $85,000 and synthetic slate roughly twice the cost of asphalt shingles. She stated the roof life-span was over and patching was no longer possible.
  • 513 South 5th Avenue: Applicant Libby Becarino asked for a wider frieze board and permission to wrap the front porch posts with a cap and base, arguing the existing posts and trim looked unfinished. No public comments were offered for or against.
  • 1812 Princess Street: Applicant Shannon Appler said he had recently purchased the house and wanted to restore its charm and add rear mudroom access. Neighbor Ruth Masey of 1811 Princess Street spoke in favor, saying the house had been vacant for many years and she was delighted to see the work done to the submitted specifications.
  • 410 Orange Street: Applicant Jennifer Sandstrom described chronic leaking around the rear-entry roof, a non-original square bathroom window, and a rotted rear door, and asked to complete the exterior repairs at the same time. No public comments were offered for or against.

Discussion Items

  • 1820 Market Street - Fencing on a corner lot: Staff reviewed the 1910 L.W. Moore House, a contributing frame Colonial Revival dwelling in Carolina Heights/Winoca Terrace. Only portions visible from public rights-of-way, excluding alleys, are subject to review. The applicant proposed a 4-foot aluminum fence with gate in the front yard and along the western property line, plus a 6-foot aluminum fence in the rear yard; the existing rear-alley wood fence would remain. Staff noted corner and aluminum fencing on adjacent properties and will enforce the city's sight-distance triangle. The commission required hardware on the inside, an inward-swinging gate, compliance with sight-distance requirements, and the 6-foot fence to begin at the rear corner of the house.
  • 323 South 4th Street - Exterior alterations: Staff reviewed the ca. 1850 Sutton-Burgwin House, a five-bay Greek Revival at Nun and South 4th Streets. The approved scope included removal of an unhealthy tree, repair and stucco of the masonry wall/structure, new rear second-story windows, French doors with side lights, rear porch and stair work, and related alterations. The transcript indicates the moving commissioner asked to omit staff conditions 7 and 14, but the adopted minutes record a full 16-condition list that includes those provisions; this discrepancy is noted.
  • 209 South 5th Avenue - Replace historic slate roof with asphalt shingles: Staff reviewed the 1915 shingle-style house and stated the Design Guidelines recommend synthetic slate. Staff provided examples from the State Historic Preservation Office, including Enviroslate and EcoStar synthetic slate. The applicant said her chosen high-grade asphalt shingles would save the house and save money. The commission discussed allowing synthetic slate on visible roof areas and asphalt on less-visible areas; the applicant asked for time to compare costs. The item was continued to June 14, 2018.
  • 513 South 5th Avenue - Exterior alterations: Staff reviewed the one-story ranch-style Lauder House, constructed around 1955 and listed as noncontributing in the National Register. The proposed craftsman gable brackets were found incompatible with the mid-century architecture and were not approved. The approved alterations included new siding, porch modifications, brick steps, a concrete double-runner driveway, and a wrapped front porch post with minimal trim molding rather than a substantial cap and base.
  • 1812 Princess Street - Exterior alterations: Staff reviewed the 1913 Edgar L. Hinton House, a bungalow with cedar shake siding that had been vacant for years and is being returned to single-family use. The approved rear alterations included replacing a window with a door, removing the exterior stair access to the second-floor balcony, adding a privacy fence, and moving an existing door. During debate, commissioners asked that the new rear door have its transom removed and its trim align with the existing second-floor doorway rather than use a flared trim treatment.
  • 410 Orange Street - Exterior alterations: Staff reviewed the 1875 Gore-Stone House, an Italianate house. The project re-pitches the leaking rear-entry roof, replaces a non-original square window with a wood 2/2 double-hung window, replaces the rotted rear door, and includes a new landing, steps, and handrail. The commission required clear glass, matching trim, planner review of the door and landing details, and compliance with the Wilmington Design Guidelines and building code.

Key Outcomes

  • 1820 Market Street: Motion to approve fencing with conditions carried 7-0.
  • 323 South 4th Street: Motion to approve exterior alterations with conditions carried 7-0.
  • 209 South 5th Avenue: Motion to continue the roof-replacement item to June 14, 2018 carried 7-0.
  • 513 South 5th Avenue: Motion to approve exterior alterations with conditions carried 7-0.
  • 1812 Princess Street: Motion to approve exterior alterations with conditions carried 5-2. Keston, Muzzey, Romero, Murphy, and Hill voted aye; McCaleb and Boney voted nay.
  • 410 Orange Street: Motion to approve exterior alterations with conditions carried 7-0.
  • The February 8, 2018 meeting minutes were approved 7-0.
  • The commission discussed pending subcommittee work on telecommunication equipment guidelines and water-drainage concerns. Staff said feedback from City Stormwater Engineer Rob Gordon would be drafted into proposed guideline language and reviewed by a subcommittee.
  • Staff reported that the African American Heritage brochure was being finalized with minor edits and new photographs and would go to the designer the following week.
  • Staff reported 80 to 90 active demolition-by-neglect cases, with roughly 40 percent of those structures vacant, and cited challenges with heir properties.
  • The next regular Historic Preservation Commission meeting is scheduled for Thursday, June 14, 2018. The meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening. I would like to go ahead and call the Thursday, May 10th, 2018 meeting of the City of Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission to order. Thank you all for coming. We appreciate your interest. Hearings before the Historic Preservation Commission are quasi-judicial in nature. This is a design review process to determine if the proposed project is congruent with the historic aspects and special character of the historic district or landmark. Decisions of the Commission are based on the record of these proceedings, the Wilmington Design Guidelines for historic districts and landmarks, and the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation. Evidence submitted to the Commission for review becomes part of the record. Appeals of commission decisions are to the Wilmington Board of Adjustment and then to Superior Court and are based on the record. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date of the commission's action. Public comment is heard during the public comment portion of the agenda item. Those who want to address the commission are sworn in as witnesses. The chair recognizes those who want to address the commission during the public hearing. Comments should be directed to the commission to ensure that all comments are properly recorded. Please come to the podum podium to address the commission, state your name and address, and speak clearly. At this time, I'd like to request that all cell phones be either turned off or put on silence mode. Thank you. Daniel will start with you. Daniel Hill. John Muzzy. Rob Romero. Hey. Lynn Boney. Edward McCaleb. Joan Keston. We are also joined this evening by the Founding City staff members, Don Snotherly, Historic Preservation Planner. Tamra Mercer, Planning Coordinator, Jeff Walton, Associate Planner, and Melissa Iverson Hales, Assistant City Attorney. At this time, if there is anyone in attendance that wishes to speak and has not already been sworn in, please stand. Uh oh. Tamra, would you please swear them in? Excuse me. Do you affirm that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? I do. Thank you. Okay, we have six items on the agenda this evening to discuss. Correct. Yes. Madam Chair, um, we have one applicant who um applicant at 1820 Market Street that would request that his item be moved to the first item of consideration. Um he's got school age children here, and uh there's probably some homework that needs to be done. So I would imagine I take no objection. Are there any others that okay? All right. We will move that item to the first one on the agenda. Would staff like to go ahead and present that. Oh, there we go. All right. Um built in uh 1910, the LW Moore House is a frame colonial revival style dwelling. The exterior is covered with aluminum siding. The first and longtime owner Moore was a prominent local realtor and insurance agent. The dwelling is a contributing structure in the Carolina Heights Winoca Terrace Historic District Overlay.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com