Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission Meeting - March 14, 2019
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission Meeting - March 14, 2019
The Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) convened on Thursday, March 14, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Skyline Center, 929 North Front Street, to consider ten agenda items. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Tara Murphy and included proceedings from the commissioners, staff presenters, and members of the public. The Commission addressed one item of old business (continued from January and February 2019 meetings), six items of new business including after-the-fact installation approvals and demolition reduction requests, and discussion of proposed guidelines for ATMs and telecommunication facilities. Votes ranged from unanimous approval to divided outcomes.
Consent Calendar
- None explicitly designated as consent; the Commission considered each item individually.
Old Business
- 516 South 5th Avenue – Construction of a new accessory structure (detached garage), continued from January and February 2019. Staff presented plans showing a rear yard 24 ft x 30 ft garage about 18 ft high, similar in design to the house and adjacent structures. The applicant provided a foundation plan and site plan. Commissioners discussed the absence of decorative brackets under eaves; staff recommended no brackets. Vice-Chairman Romero moved to approve with 11 conditions, including: height subservience to the existing house, matching lap siding reveal installed smooth side out, staff review of window/garage/pedestrian door design and paint colors, prohibition of decorative exposed brackets, and landscaping approval. Motion carried 9-0.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Item 4: 223 North 7th Street – PVC fencing. Mr. Charles Nelson, owner, stated that he originally requested a 6-ft privacy fence but after discussions with staff settled on a 4-ft PVC fence; he contended he was unaware of the need for a Certificate of Appropriateness and noted that guidelines conflict. Erin Nelson, occupant, spoke in support, saying other nearby fences (chain‑link, brick) were grandfathered. Suzanne Stanley, neighbor, expressed support, noting wood fences need painting while her neighbor’s PVC fence “looks very nice.” Beth Rutledge from Historic Wilmington Foundation spoke in opposition, stating “materials do matter … if natural materials are continually replaced with man‑made, it changes the historic fabric.”
- Item 7: 2041 Jefferson Street – reduce 90‑day stay of demolition. Mr. Don Yale, adjacent property owner, expressed concern about asbestos siding removal and whether proper permits could be obtained within the 90‑day period. He also raised that it is “rumored the applicant intends to change the use of the property to a multi‑family home.” Commissioner McCaleb explained that the Commission has no control over the permitting process or timeline.
- Item 8: 314 South 8th Street – reduce 90‑day stay of demolition. The applicant, Tony Damiano, stated the structural damage from Historic district is “significantly worse than expected” due to roof damage, water damage, mold, and evidence of squatting. He noted discussions with Zoning Administrator about subdividing the lot into 7–9 single‑family residences.
- Item 3: 215 South 5th Avenue – exterior alterations (windows and range vent). Applicant Chris Robinson requested painting the vent galvanized (instead of stainless steel) because it could be painted to match the home. Commissioner Keston expressed support for painting to match. The motion removed condition 2 (requiring stainless steel) and added that the historic wood window removed from second story be stored in a climate‑controlled environment. Motion carried 8‑1 (Mr. McCaleb opposed).
Discussion Items
- Proposed design guidelines for ATMs and Telecommunication Facilities. Staff presented draft guidelines developed after a Board of Adjustment overturned a written HPC decision due to lack of adopted ATM guidelines. The subcommittee proposed 15 guidelines, including a minimum storefront width of 6 feet (not 3) for ATMs only in non‑original storefronts. Commissioner McCaleb suggested “design standards” rather than guidelines to ensure conformity. Chairman Murphy asked that the telecommunication, ATM, and stormwater guidelines be circulated via email before the April public hearing. A public hearing is scheduled for April.
Key Outcomes
- Item 1 (Old Business): Approved with conditions 9-0.
- Item 3 (Windows/vent): Approved 8-1.
- Item 4 (PVC fencing): Motion to deny carried 9-0. Owner may request a wooden fence under staff review.
- Item 5 (720 Red Cross Street – vinyl windows/wood window): Approved 7-2 (Mr. McCaleb and Ms. Demas opposed). Conditions include record preservation agreement to replace vinyl with wood when they deteriorate.
- Item 6 (117 South 7th Street – historic chimney removal): Denied 9-0. Commission found the chimney remains look “temporarily unfinished” and the removal does not comply with design guidelines.
- Item 7 (2041 Jefferson Street – reduction of 90‑day stay): Approved 9-0 to reduce to zero days. Conditions include donating historic architectural components, protecting trees, and obtaining all required permits for asbestos and demolition.
- Item 8 (314 South 8th Street – reduction of 90‑day stay): Approved 8‑1 (Ms. Demas opposed). Reduction to zero days with same conditions regarding hazardous materials and building code compliance.
- Item 9 (Proposed guidelines for ATMs/telecom): Commission agreed to hold a public hearing in April; staff will distribute updated guidelines via email for comment.
- Item 10 (Meeting minutes from January 10, 2019): Approved 9‑0, with an amendment to add Michael Smith to the recorded attendance.
The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. The next scheduled meeting is Thursday, April 11, 2019.
Meeting Transcript
Test test. Good evening. I would like to go ahead and call the Thursday, March 14th, 2019 meeting of the City of Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission to order. Thank you for coming. We appreciate your attendance at tonight's meeting. Decisions of the Commission are based on the record of these proceedings, the Wilmington Design Guidelines for Historic Districts and Landmarks, and the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation. Evidence submitted to the Commission for review becomes part of the record. Appeals of commission decisions are to the Wilmington Board of Adjustment and then to Superior Court and are based on the record. Appeals must be filed within thirty days of the date of the Commission's action. Public comment is heard during the public comment portion of the agenda item. Those who want to address the commission are sworn as witnesses. Comments should be directed to the Commission. Please switch on the T-coil on your hearing aid or ask city staff for assistance. At this time, I would like to request that all cell phones be either turned off or put on silence mode. A reminder to the commissioners if you have received or been made aware of any outside evidence related to any of the matters. Please recuse yourself. A brief reminder that our charges with respect to the protection and preservation of properties in the cities designated historic districts. We are held to the standards of the Wilmington Design Guidelines for Historic Districts and Landmarks as adopted by City Council and per applicable NC state law to determine if exterior changes are congruous with the historic aspects and special character of the city's historic districts. It is important that we deliberate the merits of each request in a matter that provides a record as to the basis of our decisions. Please remember that our deliberations should be centered on how a project meets the design guidelines and whether the proposed change is congruous or is not congruous. At this time, I would like to ask each commissioner to introduce themselves. Daniel, we will start with you. Daniel Hill. Joan Keston. John Muzzy. Rob Romero. Tara Murphy. Edward McCaleb. Mary Ann Kaiser. Sherry Demas. Michael Smith. And we are also joined this evening by the following city staff members. Ms. Don Snotherly, Historic Preservation Planner, Jeff Waltland, Associate Planner, Amy Bradshaw, Planning Coordinator, and Melissa Huffman, Assistant City Attorney. At this time, if there is anyone in attendance that wishes to speak on any of the agenda items and has not been sworn in to date, please stand and be sworn in by Miss Bradshaw. Do you affirm that the testimony you're about to give is the truth? The whole truth and nothing about the truth. A quick overview. We have nine items on the agenda this evening. It's a rather full agenda, so if you would please keep your comments succinct, we would certainly appreciate it, and it will keep things moving. For each of those agenda items, we will hear the report from staff and then the applicant. A public comment portion of the meeting will be opened, and that is the time for interested parties to speak in favor or in opposition. Once the public comment portion is closed, we will deliberate prior to a motion and a vote. Miss Notherly, would you please present the agenda item? First one on our agenda, please. Thank you, Madam Chairman. This is a request at 516 South Fifth Avenue. If you recall, this request originally was heard by the Commission on January 10th. At the request of the applicant, it was continued to February 14th and now to March. I'm sorry, the Commissioner originally heard this January 10th and continued it to February 14th.
openpublica.com