Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission Meeting – March 11, 2021
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission Meeting – March 11, 2021
The Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) held a regular meeting on Thursday, March 11, 2021, at 5:32 p.m. in the Wilmington Convention Center (though the agenda listed City Council Chambers). Chair Rob Romero presided with eight members present (one absent). All witnesses were sworn in. The commission considered four new business items, approved prior minutes, and discussed a remanded case concerning a mural at the Pour House. All votes were 8‑0.
New Business: 313 Church Street (HDR) – Porch, Rear Addition, Screened Porch, Deck
- Request: After-the-fact approval for removal of front porch balustrade/floor, rear deck, and side covered porch; and approval for new porch balustrade, gates, floor, rear addition, rear deck, and side screened porch.
- Staff Summary: Senior Planner Ivy Freitag explained the house is a contributing resource. The applicant (Kyle Kelsey, agent for owner Jessica Buechler) initially proposed a concrete front porch floor, but after commission discussion the motion required a wood tongue‑and‑groove floor. Commissioner Ron Wilson questioned the applicant’s history with after‑the‑fact work. Commissioner Yermal noted existing windows might not be reusable per code; staff added a condition for substitute wood windows.
- Conditions: Ten conditions including requiring a wood front porch floor, review of windows and metal gates by planner, no tinted glass, lattice screening for deck foundation, and compliance with building codes.
- Vote: Motion by Vice‑Chair Keston, seconded by Kathleen Egan. Approved 8‑0.
New Business: 1802 Grace Street (R7‑HDO) – Stone Wall, Path, Carport Removal, Gazebo
- Request: After-the-fact approval to replace a cinderblock knee wall with a stone boundary wall, widen a stone path, waive the 365‑day stay of demolition to remove a metal carport, and construct a custom‑built gazebo.
- Staff Summary: Property is in the Carolina Heights/Winoca Terrace Historic District Overlay; design review applies only to views from public right‑of‑way, but the corner lot means most of the site is visible. Owner/applicant Alexandra Dorr testified.
- Commission Discussion: Commissioner Ron Wilson asked for additional decorative detailing on the gazebo posts (e.g., trellis work) to match the house. Chair Romero suggested painting the gazebo the same color as the house. Commissioner Sulkey raised structural concerns, but others noted the design was sturdy. Staff proposed a condition to work with the planner on details.
- Conditions: Three conditions including working with the historic preservation planner to add trellis details to the gazebo posts to make it consistent with the existing house.
- Vote: Motion by Kathleen Egan, seconded by Vice‑Chair Keston. Approved 8‑0.
New Business: 16 and 18 North 5th Avenue (HD) – Breezeway Removal, Siding Restoration
- Request: Approval to remove the breezeway connecting the two historic buildings and restore exterior siding.
- Staff Summary: Both buildings (circa 1860) are contributing resources. A 1977 COA allowed a covered walkway, enclosed in 1988. The breezeway is non‑historic. Applicant Scott Holmes (agent for Phoenix ILM Holdings, LLC) and Michael Murchison (agent for MTG Properties, LLC) stated the goal was to return the houses to their original state. Commissioner Yermal recused himself from voting.
- Commission Discussion: Commissioner Sulkey asked about original windows; staff said the area was all siding before the breezeway. Members agreed the removal was a positive preservation action.
- Conditions: Five conditions including waiving the 365‑day stay of demolition, finishing siding to match existing materials, and working with Historic Wilmington Foundation to salvage usable materials.
- Vote: Motion by Vice‑Chair Keston, seconded by Stephen Sulkey. Approved 8‑0 (Yermal recused, so 7‑0 effectively but recorded as 8‑0 with recusal noted).
New Business: 7 South 2nd Street, Unit 9 (CBD‑HDO) – Window Replacement
- Request: Replace four second‑floor windows.
- Action: The applicant requested a continuance to the April 8, 2021 meeting. Motion by Vice‑Chair Keston, seconded by Chair Romero. Approved 8‑0.
Approval of Minutes
- Action: The draft minutes of the February 11, 2021 HPC meeting were presented. No changes were identified. Motion by Vice‑Chair Keston, seconded by Chair Romero. Approved 8‑0.
Items from the Commission – Pour House Mural Remand
- Commissioner Ron Wilson asked about the status of the mural case at the Pour House, which the Board of Adjustment (BOA) had remanded to the HPC. Assistant City Attorney Melissa Huffman explained that the BOA found the mural should be treated as art, not a sign, and that the order had not yet been signed. She noted the BOA reviewed both the HPC’s decision (for due process) and the zoning administrator’s sign determination. Commissioner Wilson requested that commissioners receive the BOA order and related materials well in advance of the meeting when it will be reconsidered, given the potential impact. Attorney Huffman said the order would be provided once signed.
Key Outcomes
- All four new business items resolved: Items 1, 2, and 3 approved with conditions; Item 4 continued.
- Minutes approved.
- Next meeting: Scheduled for Thursday, April 8, 2021.
- Meeting adjourned at 6:20 p.m.
Meeting Transcript
Welcome everybody to this Wilmington Store Preservation Commission meeting for Thursday, March eleventh, twenty twenty-one. Hearings before the Storic Preservation Commission are quasi-judicial in nature. Decisions of the Commission are based on the record of these proceedings, Wilmington Design Standards for Storic Districts and Landmarks, and Secretary of Material Standards for Rehabilitation. Evidence submitted to the commission for review becomes part of the record. Appeals of commission decisions are to the Wilmington Board of Adjustment and then the Superior Court and are based on the record. Appeals must be filed within thirty days of the date of the commission's action. Evidence is received is received during the evidentiary hearing portion of an agenda item. Those who want to address the commissioners sworn as witnesses, present material, and substantial evidence to the commission. The chair recognizes those who want to submit such evidence during the evidentiary hearing. Evidence should be directed to the commission to ensure that the evidence is properly recorded, please come to the podium in the hall to address the commission. State your name and address and speak clearly. At this time, we'd like to request it all cell phones be either turned off or silence mode. And I'd like our folks to start into introducing themselves. Christopher Yermal. Michael Smith. Ashley Wilson. Kathleen Egan. Ron Wilson. Jeff Walton, Amy Bradshaw, City, Christine Hughes, and Ivy Try Tag. Jeff Walton, Amy Bradshaw, City Christine Hughes, and Ivy Frytag as uh staff members and great commission center tech guy. All right, we'd like to swear in the witness witnesses. If Amy's ready. If everyone who wishes to speak, all applicants and anyone who's here from the public who intends to present evidence, could please stand up and raise your right hand. Do you affirm that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Thank you. Thanks, Andy. Thanks. Good evening, everyone. All right. So the Bell House was constructed uh circa 1890, and it is a contributing resource within the historic district. The property is located at 313 Church Street and is within the historic district residential. In this district, alterations to all facades of a building and the entire site are subject to design review review, regardless of whether it can be seen from the public right of way. The application before you today involves the front porch balustrade, floor, and gates, as well as the construction of a rear building edition, deck, and side screened porch. Here's the front elevation of the house. There are three images. One of what the front porch used to look like, one as it exists now, and one of the proposed new design. The applicant is seeking approval to replace the front porch balustrade and concrete floor. A new wood balustrade is proposed on the sides and on the left of the porch. The applicant also seeks approval for new metal operable gates for the top of the front porch steps. On the left is a photo taken February 23rd of this year with the porch floor missing. On the right is a photo that was provided by the applicant to show that there was a concrete slab for floor there previously. They propose to replace that with a new concrete slab. Here are the elevations of the proposal. On the top is what used to exist, and on the bottom is the proposed new design. The applicant is seeking approval after the fact for removal of the rear deck circled in green and the side covered porch, which is in purple. Um looks blue, but uh the applicant requests approval for a new rear building edition and deck and a side screen porch. Here's the east elevation. It's a little bit easier on the bottom drawing to see how the rear of the house will be bumped out to accommodate a larger den and bathroom and a new mechanical room. Here's the rear elevation. The top left are drawings submitted by the applicant showing the existing conditions.
openpublica.com