Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission Meeting - July 14, 2022
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission Meeting - July 14, 2022
The Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission held a regular meeting on Thursday, July 14, 2022, at 5:30 p.m. in City Council Chambers at Skyline Center, 929 North Front Street, Wilmington, NC. Vice-Chair Christopher Yermal presided, with six commissioners present. The meeting included five evidentiary hearings on proposed exterior alterations to properties within historic districts, followed by discussion on future commission priorities. The meeting adjourned at 7:36 p.m.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Travis Gilbert (Historic Wilmington Foundation) supported allowing six months for the applicant at 411 Nun Street to find a suitable door, suggesting the Cape Fear Community College construction class (starting August 16) could use it as a restoration project.
- Eileen Ashton (16 South 7th Street) opposed the fence and driveway proposal at 101 S 7th Street, citing concerns about cutting the brick wall, removing trees, and harming a large tree on the property.
- Nicole Hampton (621 Dock Street) opposed the fence style (wood on concrete) and the addition of a driveway, and asked about an old well/cistern and a temporary construction fence on site.
Discussion Items
- 411 Nun Street – After-the-fact door replacement: The applicant, Kevin Doyle and Monica Jenks, acknowledged the new mahogany door was not congruous with the Italianate-style house (built circa 1891, contributing) and agreed to replace it. They noted difficulty finding an appropriate door. Commissioners suggested sources and discussed timing. Vice-Chair Yermal clarified that a new door could be approved via the bypass process once selected. After a public comment from Travis Gilbert requesting more time, the commission deliberated on a six-month compliance window.
- 101 S 7th Street – Corner lot fence and driveway: Applicant Matthew Hon sought a wood picket fence atop an existing concrete knee wall, a six-foot privacy fence in the rear, a driveway, and a brick patio. Commissioners expressed concerns about the aesthetic compatibility of wood on a brick house, the integrity of attaching to the wall, the height jump from 4 to 6 feet on a corner, and the lack of detailed drawings. Public commenters opposed the project, raising issues about the wall removal, tree loss, and the temporary construction fence. After discussion, the commission agreed to continue the item to August 11, 2022, to allow the applicant to provide scaled site plans, details of fence materials (with a preference for metal), and information on tree preservation and the cistern.
- 19 N 7th Street – Roof material replacement: Applicant Nancy Lee Frydland requested replacing historic slate with architectural shingles on the main house and standing seam metal on the porch. Staff noted a trend of slate replacement. Commissioners suggested using a slate-style asphalt shingle rather than standard architectural shingles. The applicant agreed. There was some discussion about providing evidence of water intrusion. The commission conditionally approved the roof replacement, requiring the applicant to submit a bypass application for the specific slate-style shingle, preserve salvageable slate, and maintain existing chimneys and vents.
- 103 Ann Street – Siding replacement and window: Contractor Jeff Serens, on behalf of homeowner Janet Wheeler, proposed replacing existing wood windows with vinyl windows and installing HardyPlank siding and new shutters. The property is a non-contributing townhouse built in 1970. Staff recommended wood windows per design standards. After debate, commissioners voted 4-2 to allow vinyl windows with conditions requiring simulated divided lites, a spacer bar, clear glass, and a six-over-six pattern. The siding and paint color (Benjamin Moore Simply White) were approved. Two commissioners voted against, preferring wood windows.
- 1902 Market Street – Corner lot fence modification: Applicant Adrian Monte requested changing an already-approved fence from 4-foot picket to 6-foot privacy fence in the rear yard for noise and privacy from an alley. Commissioners sought clarification on setback and potential damage from alley traffic. The motion to approve passed 6-0 with conditions limiting the fence to six feet, requiring inward-swinging gates, and setting the fence within property lines.
- Items from the Commission: Commissioner Michael Smith raised the need for a special meeting to discuss congruency guidelines, particularly fence height and location. Assistant City Attorney Melissa Huffman stated staff is compiling issues and expects to have discussions in the fall once the new Planning Director is settled.
- Items from Staff: Planner Jessica Baldwin reported that staff is working on a Request for Proposals for a historic property study and review of existing historic districts.
Key Outcomes
- 411 Nun Street: Approved 6-0 with conditions, including six months to replace the door with a historically appropriate style via bypass application.
- 101 S 7th Street: Continued 6-0 to August 11, 2022, for additional plans and details.
- 19 N 7th Street: Approved 6-0 with conditions requiring a slate-style shingle (bypass approval), preservation of existing chimneys and vents, and salvage of usable slate.
- 103 Ann Street: Approved 4-2 with conditions allowing vinyl windows (with simulated divided lites, spacer bar, clear glass, six-over-six pattern); final shutter design must be submitted before COA issuance.
- 1902 Market Street: Approved 6-0 with conditions regarding fence height, gates, and placement within property lines.
- Next Meeting: Scheduled for August 11, 2022.
Meeting Transcript
She is amazing. Oh, she's out there learning for us. All set. Good evening. Welcome to the July 14th, 2022 meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission. Hearings before the historic president, excuse me, preservation commission are quasi-judicial in nature. This is a design review process to determine if the proposed project is congruous with the special character of the historic district or landmark. Decisions of the Commission are based on the rec on the record of these proceedings, the Wilmington design standards for historic districts and landmarks and the Secretary of Interior Standards for rehabilitation. Evidence submitted to the Commission for review becomes part of the record. Appeals of commission decisions are to the Wilmington Board of Adjustment and then to Superior Court and are based on the record. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date of the commission's action. Evidence is received during the evidentiary hearing portion of an agenda item. Those who want to address the commission are sworn as witnesses to present material. It's substantial evidence to the commission. The chair recognizes those who want to submit such evidence during the evidentiary hearing. Evidence should be directed to the commission to ensure that evidence is properly recorded. Please come to the podium in the hall to adjust in the front of us to address the commission, state your name and address, and speak clearly. A brief reminder that members of the HBC are appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the city council. Our charge is with respect to the protection and preservation of properties and the designated in the city's historic city's designated historic district. It is important that we deliberate the merits of each request in a manner that provides a record as to the basis of our for our decisions. Please remember that our deliberations should be centered on how a project meets the design standards and whether the proposed change is congruous or is not congruous. Commissioners, if you have received or been made aware of any outside evidence related to any of the matters, please recuse yourself. At this time, I would like to request that all cell phones be either turned off or put in silence mode. Thank you. Um would like to introduce our city staff. We have Jessica Baldwin, our senior planner, Amy Bradshaw, planning coordinator, Melissa Huffman, assistant city attorney. Uh Ron is Ron, yeah, Ron Satterfield is in attendance, assistant director of planning. And Megan Basick, associate planner. Uh and then also wanted to introduce our new director of planning, fresh from Mansfield, Connecticut, to Wilmington, North Carolina, Linda Painter. Welcome. Linda, would you like to tell us a little bit about yourself before you begin? Uh thank you very much, and thank you for the welcome. And uh as you said, I am fresh from Connecticut. I just uh moved in the last month. So it's been an adventure, and I just a little background. I have worked for the cities of Orlando, Providence, and the town of Mansfield, so familiar with historic preservation and just looking forward to getting to know Wilmington and serving this great city. Thank you. Wonderful, thank you. Thank you very much. Um now if the commissioners would please introduce themselves starting stage right. Stephen Salke. Joan Keston. I'm Christopher Yermel. Ron Wilson. Michael Smith. And then if we could please swear in those present who wish to present evidence related to an agenda item. If I could have all staff, applicants, and anyone in the public who intends to speak this evening. To please stand up, raise your right hand. In order to speak this evening, you'll have to be sworn in. Please stand up, raise your right hand.
openpublica.com