The Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission met on Thursday, October 13, 2022, beginning at 5:30 p.m. (called to order at 5:32 p.m.), to conduct evidentiary hearings on eight applications for work in Wilmington's local historic districts. Six members were present; Ross Tomaselli was absent. Chair Kathleen Egan presided. The commission approved six requests (mostly with conditions), denied one request, and allowed one request to be withdrawn. A procedural note: the agenda listed the meeting at City Council Chambers, Skyline Center, 929 North Front Street, while the approved minutes state the meeting was in City Council Chambers, City Hall, 102 North 3rd Street; this summary relies on the minutes for the location.
Good evening and welcome to the October 13th meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission. Hearings before this commission are quasi-judicial in nature. This is a design review process to determine whether a proposed project is congruous with the special character of the historic district or landmark in which it is located. Decisions of the commission are based on the record of these proceedings, the Wilmington design standards for historic districts and landmarks, and the Secretary of Interiors standards for rehabilitation. Evidence submitted to the commission for review will become part of the record. Appeal of a commission decision must be submitted to the Wilmington Board of Adjustment within 30 days of the date of the commission's action. Further appeal must be submitted to Superior Court. Evidence pertaining to an agenda item must be presented during the evidentiary portion of that item. Individuals who wish to address the commission will be sworn in as witnesses to present material and substantial evidence. As a brief reminder, members of the commission are appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the city council. Our charge is with respect to the protection and preservation of the properties located within the city's designated historic districts. And that I will endeavor to support, maintain, and defend the constitution of said state not inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States to the best of my knowledge and ability. So help me God. Thank you. Now if the commissioners would please introduce themselves, I'll start at the second. Ron Wilson, Stephen Salke. Ashley Wilson. Kathleen Egan. Christopher Yermal. Miss Watts, you'll need to turn on your mic. Allie Watts. Thanks. And next we will need to swear in at those present who wish to present evidence related to an agenda item tonight. If I could now have all staff applicants and any members of the public who wish to speak, to please stand up and raise your right hand. In order to speak this evening, you must be sworn in. Do you swear that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Thank you. That ends our oh no, it doesn't. Sorry. The next item on the administrative port part of the meeting is approval of the minutes from last month's meeting. Does anyone have any correction to the minutes? No. Can we have a motion then to approve the minutes? I motion to approve. All in favor? Aye. Aye. And then motion passes. Then we move on to the evidentiary hearings. And the first uh item of new business number one is 114 South Sixth Street. All right. The applicant at 114 South Sixth Street proposes a new accessory structure in the rear yard. The shoemaker house was built circa 1915 and is a two-story craftsman style front gable dwelling. The house features four large brick columns with decorative recessed reveals along the first story facade. The first the one-story porch has a simple picket balustrade and a roof deck at the second story with a balustrade to match the first. In between two short brick columns capped, in between short brick columns capped with stone, the front facade has a central gable vent, one over one windows, and an off-center transomed entry. The building has flared eaves and a wide frieze at the second story roof line. The subject property is located on the east side of South 6th Street between Dock and Orange Streets. The subject property is a contributing resource in the historic district residential and revisions to office size of the building and the site are subject to design review in this district. The applicant seeks to construct a one-story garage in the rear yard.