The Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission met on Thursday, July 10, 2025, convening at 5:36 p.m. and adjourning at 6:56 p.m. Chairman Christopher Yermal presided, with members Joan Keston, Alison Watts, Ashley Wilson, Beth Rutledge, and Stephen Sulkey present. Member Ross Tomaselli was absent. Staff included Assistant City Attorney Gina Essey, Assistant Planning Director Brian Chambers, Historic Preservation Planning Manager Ben Riggle, Planner II Hillary Taylor, and Planning Coordinator Amy Bradshaw. Chairman Yermal read the procedures and appeals statements, and all witnesses were sworn in by Amy Bradshaw. The agenda and minutes conflict on the meeting location: the agenda lists City Council Chambers, Skyline Center, 929 North Front Street, while the minutes list City Council Chambers, City Hall, 102 North 3rd Street.
Good evening, everyone. Welcome to the Historic Preservation Commission meeting on this Thursday, July 10th, 2025. Hearings before the Historic Preservation Commission are quasi-judicial in nature. This is a design review process to determine if the proposed project is congruous with the special character of the historic district or landmark. Decisions of the Commission are based on the record of these proceedings, the Wilmington design standards for historic districts and landmarks, and the Secretary of Interior standards for rehabilitation. Evidence submitted to the Commission for review becomes part of the record. Appeals of commission decisions are made to the Wilmington Board of Adjustment and then to the Superior Court and are based on the record. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date of the Commission's action. Evidence is received during the evidentiary hearing portion of an agenda item. Those who want to address the commissioner sworn as witnesses to present material and substantial evidence to the commission. The chair recognizes those who want to submit such evidence during the evidentiary hearing. Evidence should be directed to the commission. To ensure that evidence is properly recorded, please come to the podium to address the commission, state your name and address, and speak clearly. Adjust the microphone if necessary too. Members of the historic preservation commission are appointed by the city council and serve at its discretion. Our responsibility is to protect and preserve properties within the districts, I'm sorry, within the city's designated historic districts. We adhere to the Wilmington design standards for historic districts and landmarks, as well as applicable North Carolina state law to assess whether exterior changes align with the unique character of the city's historic disc districts. It is important that we deliberate the merits of each request in a manner that provides a record of the basis of our decisions. Please remember that our deliberation should center on how a project meets the design standards and whether the proposed change is congruous or not congruous. Commissioners, if you have been if you have received or been made aware of any outside evidence related to any of our matters, please recuse yourself. And if you would please also uh turn off your cell phones to silent mode. Thank you for that. And I would like to introduce staff. Gina Essey, the Assistant City Attorney, Brian Chambers, Assistant Planning Director, Ben Regal, Historic Preservation Planning Manager, Hilary Taylor, City Planner, and Amy Bradshaw Planning Coordinator. Now, if I could please have commissioners introduce themselves them themselves, Stage Wright. Stephen Salke. Ashley Wilson. I'm Christopher Yermal. Joan Keston. Alison Watts. Beth Rutledge. And staff will now swear in any witnesses who wish to speak this evening over this way, please. If I can have all applicants, staff, and members of the public, please stand and raise your right hand. If you intend to speak this evening, you'll need to stand up and be sworn in. Do you swear that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Thank you. Thank you. Uh first item of business is to approve or uh make any amendments to the uh meeting minutes from the June 12th meeting. Anyone need anything there after reading reading those? No. Would someone like to make a motion then, please? I move to accept the minutes. Is there a second? Second. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Anyone opposed? That passes unanimously. Um, and then items for the evidentiary hearing.