OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission Meeting - February 12, 2026

Historic Preservation CommissionThursday, February 12, 2026
BodyWilmington, North Carolina
SessionHistoric Preservation Commission
DateThursday, February 12, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:16:40

Transcript — Verbatim
0:15

Noon, welcome me, to the historic preservation commission meeting on Thursday, February 12th, 2026.

0:24

Hearings before the Historic Preservation Commission are quasi-judicial in nature.

0:29

This is a design review process to determine if the proposed project is congruous with the special character of the historic district or landmark.

0:37

Decisions of the Commission are based on the record of these proceedings, the Wilmington Design Standards for Historic Districts and Landmarks, and a Secretary of Interior standards for rehabilitation.

0:47

Evidence submitted to the Commission for review becomes part of the record.

0:50

Appeals of commission decisions are made to the Wilmington Board of Adjustment and then to the Superior Court and are based on this record.

0:57

Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date of the commission's action.

1:00

Evidence is received during the evidentiary hearing portion of agenda item.

1:05

Those who want to address the commission are sworn as witnesses to present material and substantial evidence to the commission.

1:11

The chair recognizes those who want to submit such evidence during the evidentiary hearing.

1:16

Evidence should be directed to the commission.

1:18

To ensure that evidence is properly recorded, please come to the podium in front here.

1:23

State uh state your name and address and speak clearly.

1:28

Adjust the microphone if necessary.

1:30

Members of the Historic Preservation Commission are appointed by the city council and serve at its discretion.

1:35

Our responsibility is to protect and preserve properties within the city's historic district.

1:40

We adhere to the Wilmington Design Standards for Historic Districts and Landmarks as well as the applicable North Carolina state law to assess whether exterior changes align with the unique character of the city's historic districts.

1:51

It is important that we deliberate the merits of each request in a manner that provides a record of the basis for our decisions.

1:57

Please remember that our deliberation should center on how a project meets the design standards and whether the proposed change is congruous or not.

2:05

Commissioners, if you have received or been made aware of any outside evidence related to any of the matters, please recuse yourself.

2:12

And if you would please uh turn off your cell phones or set to silent mode.

2:18

Thank you.

2:19

Uh I'd like to introduce city staff, Gina Esse, Assistant City Attorney, and Brian Chambers, Assistant Planning Director, Ben Riggle, Historic Preservation Planning Manager, Alden Finholm, Historic Preservation Planner, Amy Bradshaw to my right, planning coordinator.

2:36

And if the commissioners could please introduce yourselves, starting over here with Beth, please.

2:40

Beth Rutledge.

2:42

Joan Keston.

2:43

I'm Christopher Yermel.

2:44

Ashley Wilson.

2:45

Stephen Salke, Ross, Thomas Sally.

2:48

And staff will now uh swear in any if I can have all witnesses who wish to speak this evening.

2:56

Staff, applicants, and anybody in the public in the audience who wishes to speak tonight.

3:02

Please stand up and raise your right hand.

3:05

Please note that you need to stand up and be sworn in in order to speak this evening.

3:09

Do you swear that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

3:15

Thank you.

3:21

Uh first item of business approval or any notes on the um the meeting minutes from the January 8th meeting.

3:31

If there are no changes, someone would like to make a motion to approve.

3:34

I move to approve.

3:35

Is there a second?

3:36

Second.

3:36

All right.

3:37

All in favor?

3:38

Aye.

3:38

Aye.

3:39

Passes.

3:40

Uh next item of business would be agenda item one.

3:46

This is the home at 409 South 15th Street, I believe, right?

3:50

Yes.

3:53

Good evening, Commissioners.

3:55

Uh case one is a request for the construction of a new side elevation portico at 409 North 15th Street.

4:02

As described in the Carolina Heights Historic District, National Registered Nomination Report, the 1999, the Allen B.

4:09

Lovehouse constructed circa 1931 is a one and a half story, Cape Cod style dwelling, three bays in width with beveled siding.

4:16

The steeply pitched gable end roof features two gable dormers, each with six over six sash windows, and an exterior end chimney on the south of side elevation.

4:29

The central front door is protected by a pedimented gable, self-supported portico.

4:35

Uh paired six over six sash windows flank the front door, and an enclosed door up in excuse me, and an enclosed porch is located on the south side of the dwelling.

4:44

The house is a contributing resource to the Carolina Heights, Winooka Terrace, Historic District Overlay, and only which that can be seen from public right-of-way, excluding alleys is subject to design review.

4:54

The property is located on the west side of North 15th Street, two parcels south of its intersection with Campbell Street.

5:01

The applicant proposes to construct a portico over the side entrance approved under COA MJW-29-2011 was approved in 2024.

5:16

A small wood frame gable entry replicating the architectural peak over the main entry on the front east facade of the home will be constructed over the side entrance.

5:25

Historically appropriate wood brackets and trim profiles consistent with 1930s Cape God detail Cape Cod detailing will be used to maintain the visual integrity of the new portico with the existing architectural style of the home.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████52%
Parking Management████████████████18%
Zoning And Land Use█████████████15%
Procedural████████9%
Environmental Protection██2%
Engineering And Infrastructure██2%
Racial Equity██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission Meeting - February 12, 2026

The Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission met on Thursday, February 12, 2026, at 5:30 p.m. in City Council Chambers, Skyline Center, to consider three agenda items: approval of minutes, two evidentiary hearings for property alterations, and a local landmark designation. All votes were unanimous (7-0).

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes – January 8, 2026: The commission approved the minutes from the previous meeting with a motion passed 7-0. No changes or discussion were noted.

Evidentiary Hearings

Item 1: 409 North 15th Street – New Side Elevation Portico

  • Applicant: Ben Riggle, Historic Preservation Manager, presented the request to construct a wood-frame gable portico over a side entrance previously approved in 2024. The property is a contributing Cape Cod style dwelling (c. 1931) in the Carolina Heights Historic District. Staff recommended three conditions (e.g., portico to match front entrance style, compliance with code). No public testimony. The commission approved unanimously 7-0 with conditions.

Item 2: 708 Market Street – Rear Addition and New Carriage House

  • Applicant/Property Owner: Jack Calderon, 708 Market Street, presented plans for a rear addition and a four-bay carriage house (similar to a 2021 approval that was never executed). The Gilcrest House (c. 1894) is a Queen Anne dwelling in the Wilmington Historic District. Key discussion points included:
    • Removal of a 14-inch gum tree (protected if >15 inches, but applicant agreed to replace with a native tree of appropriate size, to be coordinated with staff).
    • Modification to eliminate a second-floor Juliet balcony on the west exposure, replacing it with solid siding.
    • Fencing: applicant agreed to use wrought iron instead of chain link; a six-foot gate on the South 7th Street frontage was debated (front yard fences typically limited to 4 feet). The gate will be set back 15–20 feet and taper from 6 to 4.5 feet; applicant agreed to 4 feet if required.
    • Parking: eight spaces provided (four in garage, four on gravel), meeting code requirements for a four-unit condominium.
    • Trash: residents will bring individual city bins to the street; no communal dumpster planned.
  • Public Testimony:
    • Jenna Alt Holcomb (17 South 7th Street, adjacent neighbor) spoke in favor of improvements but raised concerns about parking strain on South 7th Street (narrow street, existing on-street parking issues), the single 12-foot driveway causing trash truck maneuverability problems, and uncertainty about grading/fencing plans. She requested clarity on the South 7th Street frontage plan before approval.
    • Eileen Ashton (14 & 16 South 7th Street) supported parking concerns, noting difficulty finding street parking.
  • Commission Deliberation: Concerns focused on tree replacement, fence material (no new chain link), gate height, and the Juliet balcony removal. The applicant expressed willingness to cooperate.
  • Motion: Approved 7-0 with conditions 1–9 from staff report, plus condition 10 (solid siding wall on west exposure in lieu of balcony) and condition 11 (replace gum tree per staff coordination).

Other Business

Item 3: Mary Etta Williams House Local Landmark Designation – 709 North 8th Street

  • Staff: Alden Finholm, Preservation Planner I, presented the application for local landmark designation. The 1941 bungalow (contributing to the National Register Wilmington Historic District) has been owned by the same African American family since 1885. It is associated with educator Sadie Williams Joseph, who taught at the Rosenwald-funded Kane Tuck School. The current owner, Tammy Graham (granddaughter), has continued the family’s educational legacy. Staff noted the property’s significance for post-emancipation landownership and resilience through the 1898 Wilmington Massacre and Jim Crow era.
  • Commission Question: Commissioner noted the roof has been replaced (modern striated metal vs. original 5V tin) and requested that the designation not claim the roof as historic. Staff agreed to note this in the record.
  • Applicant Testimony: Tammy Graham (709 North 8th Street) spoke emotionally about discovering the property’s history, including family oral accounts of the 1898 riot. She expressed gratitude for the designation.
  • Public Testimony: None additional beyond the applicant.
  • Commission Deliberation: Applauded the thorough research and recognized the property’s significance. No opposition.
  • Motion: Approved 7-0 with conditions (property becomes subject to design review by the HPC for any exterior changes).

Key Outcomes

  • All three agenda items passed unanimously (7-0).
  • Item 1 (409 N 15th St): Approved with staff conditions for portico construction.
  • Item 2 (708 Market St): Approved with 11 conditions, including tree replacement, solid wall instead of balcony, and use of wrought iron (not chain link) for new fencing. The gate height will be resolved per zoning requirements (likely 4 feet on the 7th Street frontage). Parking and trash arrangements are per code and applicant’s plan.
  • Item 3 (709 N 8th St): Local landmark designation approved, making future exterior changes subject to HPC review. The property’s roof replacement will be noted as non-historic.
  • No items from commission or staff were raised.
  • Meeting adjourned after unanimous vote.

Meeting Transcript

Noon, welcome me, to the historic preservation commission meeting on Thursday, February 12th, 2026. Hearings before the Historic Preservation Commission are quasi-judicial in nature. This is a design review process to determine if the proposed project is congruous with the special character of the historic district or landmark. Decisions of the Commission are based on the record of these proceedings, the Wilmington Design Standards for Historic Districts and Landmarks, and a Secretary of Interior standards for rehabilitation. Evidence submitted to the Commission for review becomes part of the record. Appeals of commission decisions are made to the Wilmington Board of Adjustment and then to the Superior Court and are based on this record. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date of the commission's action. Evidence is received during the evidentiary hearing portion of agenda item. Those who want to address the commission are sworn as witnesses to present material and substantial evidence to the commission. The chair recognizes those who want to submit such evidence during the evidentiary hearing. Evidence should be directed to the commission. To ensure that evidence is properly recorded, please come to the podium in front here. State uh state your name and address and speak clearly. Adjust the microphone if necessary. Members of the Historic Preservation Commission are appointed by the city council and serve at its discretion. Our responsibility is to protect and preserve properties within the city's historic district. We adhere to the Wilmington Design Standards for Historic Districts and Landmarks as well as the applicable North Carolina state law to assess whether exterior changes align with the unique character of the city's historic districts. It is important that we deliberate the merits of each request in a manner that provides a record of the basis for our decisions. Please remember that our deliberation should center on how a project meets the design standards and whether the proposed change is congruous or not. Commissioners, if you have received or been made aware of any outside evidence related to any of the matters, please recuse yourself. And if you would please uh turn off your cell phones or set to silent mode. Thank you. Uh I'd like to introduce city staff, Gina Esse, Assistant City Attorney, and Brian Chambers, Assistant Planning Director, Ben Riggle, Historic Preservation Planning Manager, Alden Finholm, Historic Preservation Planner, Amy Bradshaw to my right, planning coordinator. And if the commissioners could please introduce yourselves, starting over here with Beth, please. Beth Rutledge. Joan Keston. I'm Christopher Yermel. Ashley Wilson. Stephen Salke, Ross, Thomas Sally. And staff will now uh swear in any if I can have all witnesses who wish to speak this evening. Staff, applicants, and anybody in the public in the audience who wishes to speak tonight. Please stand up and raise your right hand. Please note that you need to stand up and be sworn in in order to speak this evening. Do you swear that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Thank you. Uh first item of business approval or any notes on the um the meeting minutes from the January 8th meeting. If there are no changes, someone would like to make a motion to approve. I move to approve. Is there a second? Second. All right. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Passes. Uh next item of business would be agenda item one. This is the home at 409 South 15th Street, I believe, right? Yes. Good evening, Commissioners. Uh case one is a request for the construction of a new side elevation portico at 409 North 15th Street.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com