The Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission met on Thursday, April 9, 2026, at 5:30 p.m. in City Council Chambers at 929 North Front Street, Wilmington, NC. Chairman Christopher Yermal presided; Commissioners Joan Keston, Beth Rutledge, Stephen Sulkey, Alison Watts, and Ashley Wilson were present, and Ross Tomaselli was absent. The quasi-judicial hearing included sworn testimony, staff reports, design-standard review, and votes on eight evidentiary matters. All votes were 6-0.
Good afternoon. Welcome to the Historic Preservation Commission meeting this Thursday, April 9th, 2026. Hearings before the historic preservation commission are chwa quasi judicial in nature. This is a design review process to determine if the proposed project is congruous with the special character of the historic district or landmark. Decisions of the commission are based on the record of these proceedings, the Wilmington Design Standards for Historic Districts and Landmarks, and the Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation. Evidence submitted to the Commission for review becomes a part of the record. Appeals of commission decisions are made to the Wilmington Board of Adjustment and then to the Superior Court and are based on the record. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date of the commission's action. Evidence is received during the evidentiary hearing portion of an agenda item, and those who want to address the commission are sworn as witnesses to present material and substantial evidence to the commission. The chair recognizes those who want to submit such evidence during the evidentiary hearing. Evidence should be directed to the commission to ensure that evidence is properly recorded. Please come to the podium, address the commission, state your name and address, and speak clearly. Members of the Historic Preservation Commission are appointed by the City Council and serve it as discretion. We adhere to the Wilmington Design Standards for Historic Districts and Landmarks as well as applicable North Carolina state law to assess whether exterior changes align with the unique character of the city's historic districts. It is important that we deliberate the merits of each request in a manner that provides a record of the basis for our decisions. Please remember that our deliberation should center on how a project meets the design standards and whether the proposed change is congruous or not. Commissioners, if you have received or been made aware of any outside evidence related to any of the matters, please recuse yourself. And if you would please turn off or set your cell phones to silent mode. And if I could ask the commissioners to introduce myself, beginning audience right. The first order of business is uh approval of minutes. Would someone uh like to make a motion or are there any changes that need to be made before a motion? No changes. I move to approve the minutes. Is there a second? Second. All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? That passed unanimously. Uh moving on to evidentiary hearings. The two thirty McRae Street project is postponed, or rather, it's continued until second Thursday in May. So that's the May 14th. And I'll also want to note that if anyone is in attendance tonight for the project at 109 South 7th Street. So in case anyone's here for that item, it's withdrawn. And you are free to stay or go. Um Mr. Yur Chairman Yermel, I believe that you need a motion to continue the first item. Oh, we do. Okay. Is there a motion to continue this thing until May? I still move. Is there a second? Second. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Passes. Um and then picking up on old business from last month. Now it's this month, 226 South Front Street. Ben, if you'd help us with this presentation, please.