OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Wilmington, North Carolina/Historic Preservation Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Summary – May 14, 2026

Historic Preservation Commission — Thursday, May 14, 2026
BodyWilmington, North Carolina
SessionHistoric Preservation Commission
DateThursday, May 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:59:53

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
1:00

Yeah, I'm sure.

1:01

Welcome to the Historic Preservation Commission meeting on this Thursday, May 14th, 2026.

1:07

Hearings before the Historic Preservation Commission are quasi-judicial in nature.

1:11

This is a design review process to determine if the proposed project is congruous with the special character of the historic district or landmark.

1:19

Decisions of the commission are based on the record of these proceedings.

1:27

I'm sorry, historic districts and landmarks, and the Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation.

1:32

Evidence submitted to the Commission for review becomes a part of the record.

1:36

Appeals of commission decisions are made to the Wilmington Board of Adjustment and then the Superior Court and are based on the record.

1:42

Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date of the Commission's action.

1:46

Evidence is received during the evidentiary hearing portion of an agenda item.

1:50

Those who want to address the commission are sworn as a witnesses to present material and substantial evidence to the commission.

1:56

The chair recognizes those who want to submit such evidence during the evidentiary hearing.

2:00

Evidence should be directed to the commission.

2:02

To ensure that evidence is properly recorded, please come to the podium, address the commission, state your name and address, and speak clearly.

2:09

Members of the Historic Preservation Commission are appointed by the city council and serve it as discretion.

2:14

Our responsibility is to protect and preserve properties within the city's historic designated city's designated historic districts.

2:22

We adhere to their Wilmington design standards for historic districts and landmarks, as well as applicable North Carolina state law to assess whether exterior changes align with the unique character of the city's historic districts.

2:41

Please remember that our deliberation should center on how a project meets the design standards and whether the proposed change is congruous or not.

2:50

Commissioners, if you have received or been made aware of any outside evidence related to any of the matters, please recuse yourself.

2:57

And if you would also please everyone turn off your cell phones or set them to silent mode, and thank you for that.

3:22

And if the commissioners would please introduce themselves over to my left.

3:26

Beth Rutledge, Alison Watts.

3:28

Christopher Yermal.

3:30

Ashley Wilson.

3:31

Stephen Sulkey.

3:32

Ross Thomas Ellie.

3:34

And uh Amy over here will swear in any witnesses who wish to speak this evening.

3:39

If I could have all staff, applicants, and members of the public, anybody who wishes to speak this evening will need to stand up and raise your right hand.

3:48

Please note that you must stand up and be sworn in in order to speak this evening.

4:00

Thank you.

4:02

Um first item of business.

4:04

Uh in regards to the meeting minutes from our last meeting on April 9th, 2026.

4:11

Any uh changes needed, questions, comments, or would someone like to make a motion to approve.

4:18

I'll make a motion to approve.

4:19

Is there a second?

4:20

Second.

4:21

All in favor?

4:22

Aye.

4:23

Any opposed?

4:24

That passes.

4:25

Thank you.

4:26

Um then uh 230 McCray Street that has been withdrawn.

4:33

So new business, 509 uh 509 Orange Street.

4:48

Good evening.

4:49

Hearing two is for the proposal to enclose a portion of the rear second story porch at 509 Orange Street.

5:00

The property is located on the north side of Orange Street, three parcels east of the intersection of Fifth Avenue and Orange Street.

5:04

The subject houses a contributing resource to the historic district residential neighborhood.

5:09

And in this district, all facades of the building and site are subject to design review.

5:17

The following property description is adapted from the Wilmington Historic District boundary report.

5:22

The Taylor House constructed 1904 is a two-story residence featuring a hipped roof with projecting pediment gables.

5:30

The full width front porch includes a central pediment, turnposts, decorative bolestrade, and ornamental brackets with pendants.

5:38

Additional character defining features include a two over two sash windows, a polygonal bay on the first floor.

5:48

This slide shows the applicant provider photographs of the primary dwelling and the proposed work area.

5:54

The rear north facade photograph identifies the portion of the second floor porch proposed for the enclosure.

6:01

Highlighted by the applicant.

6:17

In this slide, are our additional applicant photos, photographs for of the second floor rear porch.

6:29

As stated before, the applicant proposes to enclose the proportion of the existing second floor porch to create an interior room.

6:37

The enclosure will span from the current exterior side wall to the central column.

6:42

The new exterior wall will use five-inch reveal lapped wood siding painted to match the existing exterior.

6:48

The existing building footprint and site layout will not be altered.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████53%
Zoning And Land Use███████████████████████27%
Engineering And Infrastructure████████9%
Parks and Recreation█████6%
Parking Management███3%
Procedural██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Summary – May 14, 2026

The Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) held a regular meeting on Thursday, May 14, 2026, at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at the Skyline Center. The quasi-judicial hearing addressed six evidentiary items concerning exterior alterations and new construction within the city's Historic District-Residential (HD-R) zone, guided by the Wilmington Design Standards and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes: The minutes from the April 9, 2026 meeting were approved unanimously (6-0) on a motion by Ms. Wilson, seconded by Mr. Sulkey.
  • Item Withdrawal: The application for new house construction at 230 McRae Street (Case MJW-55-2603) was withdrawn by the applicant prior to the conclusion of the hearing.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • 814 Macumber Alley (Case MJW-65-2605): Anthony Demings of 812 Macumber Alley spoke in opposition. He raised concerns about parking depth leading to vehicles blocking the alley, overflow from potential short-term rental use, the need to preserve the alley's historic cobblestone/paver materials during utility work, and the incompatibility of a two-story structure with stacked porches on a street defined by one-story or one-and-a-half-story buildings.

Discussion Items & Actions

1. 509 Orange Street – Rear Porch Enclosure (MJW-64-2605)

  • Proposal: Applicant Jim Seaver sought approval to enclose a portion of the existing second-floor rear porch.
  • Discussion: Commissioners discussed conditions to preserve a vertical trim board to visually distinguish the original structure from the new enclosure and to allow a matching wood replacement window if the relocated historic window could not meet modern building codes.
  • Outcome: Approved 6-0. The motion included standard staff conditions and specific conditions regarding the trim board and window replacement.

2. 814 Macumber Alley – New House Construction (MJW-65-2605)

  • Proposal: Applicants Tim Johnson and Kurt Anderson proposed a two-story front-gable house with stacked porches.
  • Discussion: Commissioners and the public raised concerns about scale, vertical presence, compatibility with the single-story street, lack of side windows, and parking. The applicants expressed willingness to redesign by removing the upper porch, altering the roof to a hip design, and adjusting windows.
  • Outcome: Continued to June 11, 2026 (6-0) . The commission determined the proposed changes were substantive redesigns requiring formal resubmission.

3. 511 Grace Street – Rear Double Porch Construction (MJW-66-2605)

  • Proposal: Applicant Landon Biehl requested approval for a new rear porch designed to match the home's French chateau style, using stucco, arches, and specific materials.
  • Discussion: Commissioners commended the meticulous design and the applicant's stewardship of the unique historic property.
  • Outcome: Approved 6-0. The motion included standard conditions, with the final fireplace design deferred to the administrative bypass process.

4. 218 McRae Street – Window Replacement with Change of Material (MJW-67-2605)

  • Proposal: Representative David King requested to replace rear wood windows with composite (Fibrex) windows for durability.
  • Discussion: Commissioners lacked a physical sample and evidence of repairability. They noted the front windows were approved for wood replacement. The applicant stated a preference for composite but a willingness to use wood.
  • Outcome: Application Withdrawn by the applicant. Commissioners recommended consulting a historic window restoration specialist.

5. 214 McRae Street – After-the-Fact Accessory Building Location Approval (MJW-68-2605)

  • Proposal: David King requested approval for an accessory building constructed outside its approved footprint, extending into HOA common area (subsequently approved by the HOA).
  • Discussion: Staff confirmed the design was unchanged from the original approval. Discussion focused on HOA governance and the future of the common area.
  • Outcome: Approved 6-0. The motion tied this approval to the conditions of the original Certificate of Appropriateness (MJW-26-2511).

Other Business

  • Greystone Mansion (Bridgers Mansion): Commissioner Rutledge inquired about the status of the fire-damaged property. Staff reported the structure remains unstable, preventing a full insurance inspection, and no formal updates have been received.

Next Meeting

The next regular meeting was scheduled for Thursday, June 11, 2026. The meeting was adjourned at 7:31 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

Yeah, I'm sure. Welcome to the Historic Preservation Commission meeting on this Thursday, May 14th, 2026. Hearings before the Historic Preservation Commission are quasi-judicial in nature. This is a design review process to determine if the proposed project is congruous with the special character of the historic district or landmark. Decisions of the commission are based on the record of these proceedings. I'm sorry, historic districts and landmarks, and the Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation. Evidence submitted to the Commission for review becomes a part of the record. Appeals of commission decisions are made to the Wilmington Board of Adjustment and then the Superior Court and are based on the record. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date of the Commission's action. Evidence is received during the evidentiary hearing portion of an agenda item. Those who want to address the commission are sworn as a witnesses to present material and substantial evidence to the commission. The chair recognizes those who want to submit such evidence during the evidentiary hearing. Evidence should be directed to the commission. To ensure that evidence is properly recorded, please come to the podium, address the commission, state your name and address, and speak clearly. Members of the Historic Preservation Commission are appointed by the city council and serve it as discretion. Our responsibility is to protect and preserve properties within the city's historic designated city's designated historic districts. We adhere to their Wilmington design standards for historic districts and landmarks, as well as applicable North Carolina state law to assess whether exterior changes align with the unique character of the city's historic districts. Please remember that our deliberation should center on how a project meets the design standards and whether the proposed change is congruous or not. Commissioners, if you have received or been made aware of any outside evidence related to any of the matters, please recuse yourself. And if you would also please everyone turn off your cell phones or set them to silent mode, and thank you for that. And if the commissioners would please introduce themselves over to my left. Beth Rutledge, Alison Watts. Christopher Yermal. Ashley Wilson. Stephen Sulkey. Ross Thomas Ellie. And uh Amy over here will swear in any witnesses who wish to speak this evening. If I could have all staff, applicants, and members of the public, anybody who wishes to speak this evening will need to stand up and raise your right hand. Please note that you must stand up and be sworn in in order to speak this evening. Thank you. Um first item of business. Uh in regards to the meeting minutes from our last meeting on April 9th, 2026. Any uh changes needed, questions, comments, or would someone like to make a motion to approve. I'll make a motion to approve. Is there a second? Second. All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? That passes. Thank you. Um then uh 230 McCray Street that has been withdrawn. So new business, 509 uh 509 Orange Street. Good evening. Hearing two is for the proposal to enclose a portion of the rear second story porch at 509 Orange Street. The property is located on the north side of Orange Street, three parcels east of the intersection of Fifth Avenue and Orange Street. The subject houses a contributing resource to the historic district residential neighborhood. And in this district, all facades of the building and site are subject to design review. The following property description is adapted from the Wilmington Historic District boundary report. The Taylor House constructed 1904 is a two-story residence featuring a hipped roof with projecting pediment gables.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com