OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission Meeting – August 13, 2026

Historic Preservation CommissionThursday, August 13, 2026
BodyWilmington, North Carolina
SessionHistoric Preservation Commission
DateThursday, August 13, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:45:05

Transcript — Verbatim
0:56

Good evening.

0:57

Welcome to the Historic Preservation Commission meeting on this Thursday, August 13th, 2006.

1:04

Hearings before the historic preservation commission are quasi-judicial in nature.

1:08

This is a design review process to determine if the proposed project is congruous with the special character of the historic district or landmark.

1:15

Decisions of the commission are based on the record of these proceedings, the Wilmington design standards for historic districts and landmarks, and the Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation.

1:24

Evidence submitted to the commission for review becomes part of the record.

1:28

Appeals of commission decisions are made to the Wilmington Board of Adjustment and then the Superior Court and are based on the record.

1:35

Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date of the commission's action.

1:38

Evidence is received during the evidentiary hearing portion of an agenda item.

1:42

Those who want to address the commission are sworn as witnesses to present material and substantial evidence to the commission.

1:48

The chair recognizes those who want to submit such evidence during the evidentiary hearing.

1:53

Evidence should be directed to the commission.

1:55

To ensure that evidence is properly recorded, please come to the podium in front here.

1:59

Um maybe adjust the microphone if you need to adjust the commission, state your name and address, and speak clearly.

2:06

Members of the Historic Preservation Commission are appointed by the city council and serve at its discretion.

2:12

Our responsibility is to protect and preserve properties within the city's designated historic districts.

2:17

We adhere to the Wilmington design standards for historic districts and landmarks as well as applicable North Carolina state law to assess whether exterior changes align with the unique character of the city's historic districts.

2:29

It is important that we deliberate the merits of each request in a manner that provides a record of the basis for our decisions.

2:37

Please remember that our deliberation should center on how a project meets the design standards and whether the proposed change is congruous or not.

2:45

Commissioners, if you have been uh made aware or received any outside evidence related to any of the matters, please recuse yourself.

2:53

And if you would also please turn off your cell phones or set to silent mode.

3:00

Thank you for that.

3:01

And I would like to introduce staff starting at my left over here, Brian Chambers, Gina Essie.

3:07

Is that I'm sorry.

3:09

Uh another staff member.

3:13

I'm sorry.

3:14

Oh, it's a dog.

3:15

Oh my gosh, I'm sorry.

3:17

Gina's daughter.

3:18

Future future staff.

3:19

Okay, Gina Essie.

3:21

Um Alden Filnholm, uh, Ben Regal, and then to my right is Amy Bradshaw.

3:27

And then if commissioners could please introduce themselves from my left, starting there.

3:32

I'm Paul Lerler.

3:35

I'm Christopher Yermal.

3:36

Ashley Wilson.

3:40

Um staff will now swear in any witnesses over facing this way toward Amy, swearing any witnesses who will speak tonight.

3:47

Um, if you will stand for that oath and face that direction, please toward Amy.

3:52

If anyone who wishes to speak this evening, if you have an item on the agenda or you plan to speak towards an item on the agenda, please stand up and raise your right hand.

4:01

Please note you must stand up and be sworn in in order to speak this evening.

4:05

Do you swear that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

4:11

Thank you.

4:13

Thank you.

4:14

Uh first order of business tonight.

4:16

Well, first of all, before that, uh just want to announce that there are uh Wilmington Police Department and a uh uh SWAT team associated with the department are doing some trainings tonight.

4:28

So they're starting in upper floors and they'll be working their way down here.

4:31

But if you see uh a fleet outside of vehicles of that nature or inside, don't be alarmed, it's just a a typical training that's being done.

4:39

Um also want to note that we're gonna well actually let's do this first.

4:48

Approval of minutes.

4:49

Can someone make a motion about are there any adjustments or can we go ahead and approve uh someone make a motion to approve the minutes from last month?

4:56

So moved.

4:57

Is there a second?

4:58

All in favor?

4:59

Aye.

5:00

Any opposed?

5:00

That passes.

5:02

Um other housekeeping item items, agenda items number six, seven, and eight, twenty-three north front, twenty-seven and north front, and thirty-five north front.

5:11

A continuance has been requested.

5:12

I think we have to make a motion to push that forward to a motion to continue.

5:17

Is there a second?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████60%
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████████28%
Procedural██████8%
Budget Equity Analysis1%
Community Engagement1%
Public Engagement1%
Public Safety1%
Summary of Proceedings

Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission – August 13, 2026

The Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission met on Thursday, August 13, 2026, at 5:30 p.m. as listed on the agenda, in City Council Chambers, Skyline Center, 929 North Front Street, Wilmington, NC. After swearing in witnesses, the commission approved the July 9, 2026 minutes, granted continuances for three North Front Street applications, and held evidentiary hearings on one continued application and six new applications. Every application decided on its merits was approved, most by unanimous vote. Note: the transcript's opening line states '2006,' but the agenda and meeting date are 2026; this summary follows the agenda date.

Consent Calendar / Procedural Actions

  • The commission unanimously approved the July 9, 2026 draft minutes.
  • The commission granted requested continuances for agenda items 6, 7, and 8: 23 N. Front St., 27 N. Front St., and 35 N. Front St. The agenda records each continuance as passing 7-0; in the transcript they were handled together by voice vote.
  • All witnesses were sworn before testifying; no non-applicant public comments were offered during the evidentiary hearings.

Evidentiary Hearings – Old Business

  • 1812 Grace St. (COA-2026-0179) – Continued from the July 9 meeting. The proposal included replacing the front door and portico light fixture, enclosing a west-side solarium/porch with glass panels, constructing a one-story rear east-side addition, and replacing or reconfiguring windows on the rear elevation. Staff described the house as a c. 1925 contributing Colonial Revival dwelling in the Carolina Heights–Winoka Terrace Historic District Overlay. Staff recommended conditions including a tree-removal permit if any tree over 4 inches in diameter at breast height is removed. Agent David DeShamps answered questions. One commissioner did not participate in the vote; the motion to approve passed 6-0.

Evidentiary Hearings – New Business

  • 12 N. 6th St. (COA-2026-0182) – St. Paul's Evangelical Lutheran Church sought to expand the existing Ash Garden west of the fellowship hall by approximately 17 feet, add a new patio of Techno Blue 60 paver slabs, install a low masonry wall with a 5-foot black aluminum fence with finials, add landscaping, seven 52-inch monument stones, a bench, and low-level lighting. The nearest house across N. 6th St. is about 100 feet away. Pastor Mark Opgran testified in support, describing it as a second expansion of the garden. The commission approved the request 7-0 with conditions limiting light trespass, capping fence height, protecting mature trees, and requiring code compliance.
  • 206 Orange St. (COA-2026-0197) – The owner proposed widening the east driveway gate from 8 feet to 11 feet to match the west gate, replacing both existing concrete driveways with permeable turf-block/paver paving, and relocating/reconstructing part of a masonry retaining wall and stair. Owner Dan Camoncho testified and said he was open to either brick or concrete stairs. The commission approved the request 7-0 with staff conditions 1-4 and an added condition 5 requiring the relocated stairs to be rebuilt in brick to match the existing wall.
  • 1619 Chestnut St. (COA-2026-0199) – The request was to raise the existing brick wall along the eastern property line on 17th Street and construct a 6-foot-tall wood fence along the northern alley-side property line, approximately 2 feet inside the line, spanning about 65 feet. Owner Sean Winders testified that the fence would help screen HVAC equipment, electrical gear, and gas lines and would remain about 3 feet from the garage wall. The commission approved the request 7-0 with conditions requiring natural wood fencing, the finished side facing the public right-of-way, no removal of mature trees or historic landscaping, and code/permit compliance.
  • 312 S. Front St. (COA-2026-0200) – The applicant proposed widening the existing driveway from 7 feet 4 inches to 12 feet, replacing the concrete driveway with a chevron-pattern concrete surface and larger replicated gates, and replacing existing 7-over-4 and 6-over-1 windows with Pella Reserve traditional wood-frame units with true simulated muntins. Staff noted the window replacement had been sought before and the commission had recommended repair, but the owner/applicant stated repair had not been feasible. The commission approved the request 7-0 with conditions requiring clear glazing, no alterations to window opening sizes, wood frames with true simulated muntins and no snap-on muntins, no mature tree removal, archaeological protocol if materials are found, and code/permit compliance.
  • 1403 Market St. (COA-2026-0207) – Trinity United Methodist Church requested replacement of 93 existing double-hung wood windows in the church's 1948 two-story education building with Marvin fiberglass-clad wood windows in bronze, as part of a larger rehabilitation. Staff noted the education building is non-contributing and most windows date to the 1948 addition. Pastor Brock Meyer and agent Chad Brennan testified about water infiltration, long-term stewardship, cost, and a prior commission approval for Grace United Methodist Church. When a commissioner questioned economics, the agent said the lower restoration quote of about $178,000 addressed only sashes, while the proposed new installation was quoted near $350,000 and a fuller quote exceeded $700,000. The commission approved the request unanimously.
  • 613 Orange St. (COA-2026-0210) – The applicant requested removal of the chimney down to the roofline, sealing the opening with flat-channel standing seam metal roofing to match the existing roof. The house is non-contributing; staff noted the house was originally approved by the HPC in 1988 without a chimney, and the chimney was later approved in 1989. The applicant was not present. The commission approved the request 7-0 with conditions on matching roofing material, proper disposal, and code compliance.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No member of the general public spoke in favor of or against the applications.
  • Sworn testimony was provided by David DeShamps (agent for 1812 Grace St.), Pastor Mark Opgran (St. Paul's, 12 N. 6th St.), Dan Camoncho (owner, 206 Orange St.), Sean Winders (owner, 1619 Chestnut St.), the applicant for 312 S. Front St., and Pastor Brock Meyer with agent Chad Brennan for 1403 Market St. All testified in support of or answered questions about their respective projects.

Discussion Items

  • Window-replacement standards – During the 312 S. Front St. and 1403 Market St. hearings, commissioners discussed whether they could require repair rather than replacement of historic wood windows. Staff advised that wood-for-wood replacement is generally allowed and that the commission cannot require the owner to repair when the replacement is still wood. Several commissioners expressed concern that this weakens the preservation standards for original windows and that new wood windows are not equivalent to old-growth historic windows.
  • 1403 Market St. deviation – At staff's request, the commission clarified that the approval of fiberglass-clad window units was a deviation from the window material standards. The stated basis was that the building is non-contributing, the affected windows are in a 1948 education building, the project involves 93 windows, and the applicant is an institutional church. Commissioners emphasized that this approval was specific to this case and did not set a general precedent, though some noted future applicants could cite it.
  • Other business and materials discussion – A commissioner encouraged residents to complete the City of Wilmington's Resilient Coastal Communities Program survey before the August 21 deadline, and staff said they would work to make the survey more visible on the city website. A commissioner also advocated updating the commission's approach to alternate materials such as fiber-cement and composite products, citing rot, maintenance costs, and fire risk in dense historic districts. Another commissioner referenced a National Park Service bulletin on alternative materials. Staff announced that phase one will include 10 wayfinding signs using ARPA funds, with phase two to follow, and noted upcoming work on Quince and Henderson alleys should be coordinated with the signage plan.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved July 9, 2026 minutes by voice vote.
  • Granted continuances for 23 N. Front St. (COA-2026-0204), 27 N. Front St. (COA-2026-0205), and 35 N. Front St. (COA-2026-0206).
  • Approved 1812 Grace St. (COA-2026-0179) 6-0 with conditions.
  • Approved 12 N. 6th St. (COA-2026-0182) 7-0 with conditions.
  • Approved 206 Orange St. (COA-2026-0197) 7-0 with conditions, including brick reconstruction of the relocated stairs.
  • Approved 1619 Chestnut St. (COA-2026-0199) 7-0 with conditions.
  • Approved 312 S. Front St. (COA-2026-0200) 7-0 with conditions.
  • Approved 1403 Market St. (COA-2026-0207) unanimously as a deviation from standards, with the basis recorded and no established precedent.
  • Approved 613 Orange St. (COA-2026-0210) 7-0 with conditions.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening. Welcome to the Historic Preservation Commission meeting on this Thursday, August 13th, 2006. Hearings before the historic preservation commission are quasi-judicial in nature. This is a design review process to determine if the proposed project is congruous with the special character of the historic district or landmark. Decisions of the commission are based on the record of these proceedings, the Wilmington design standards for historic districts and landmarks, and the Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation. Evidence submitted to the commission for review becomes part of the record. Appeals of commission decisions are made to the Wilmington Board of Adjustment and then the Superior Court and are based on the record. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date of the commission's action. Evidence is received during the evidentiary hearing portion of an agenda item. Those who want to address the commission are sworn as witnesses to present material and substantial evidence to the commission. The chair recognizes those who want to submit such evidence during the evidentiary hearing. Evidence should be directed to the commission. To ensure that evidence is properly recorded, please come to the podium in front here. Um maybe adjust the microphone if you need to adjust the commission, state your name and address, and speak clearly. Members of the Historic Preservation Commission are appointed by the city council and serve at its discretion. Our responsibility is to protect and preserve properties within the city's designated historic districts. We adhere to the Wilmington design standards for historic districts and landmarks as well as applicable North Carolina state law to assess whether exterior changes align with the unique character of the city's historic districts. It is important that we deliberate the merits of each request in a manner that provides a record of the basis for our decisions. Please remember that our deliberation should center on how a project meets the design standards and whether the proposed change is congruous or not. Commissioners, if you have been uh made aware or received any outside evidence related to any of the matters, please recuse yourself. And if you would also please turn off your cell phones or set to silent mode. Thank you for that. And I would like to introduce staff starting at my left over here, Brian Chambers, Gina Essie. Is that I'm sorry. Uh another staff member. I'm sorry. Oh, it's a dog. Oh my gosh, I'm sorry. Gina's daughter. Future future staff. Okay, Gina Essie. Um Alden Filnholm, uh, Ben Regal, and then to my right is Amy Bradshaw. And then if commissioners could please introduce themselves from my left, starting there. I'm Paul Lerler. I'm Christopher Yermal. Ashley Wilson. Um staff will now swear in any witnesses over facing this way toward Amy, swearing any witnesses who will speak tonight. Um, if you will stand for that oath and face that direction, please toward Amy. If anyone who wishes to speak this evening, if you have an item on the agenda or you plan to speak towards an item on the agenda, please stand up and raise your right hand. Please note you must stand up and be sworn in in order to speak this evening. Do you swear that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Thank you. Thank you. Uh first order of business tonight. Well, first of all, before that, uh just want to announce that there are uh Wilmington Police Department and a uh uh SWAT team associated with the department are doing some trainings tonight. So they're starting in upper floors and they'll be working their way down here. But if you see uh a fleet outside of vehicles of that nature or inside, don't be alarmed, it's just a a typical training that's being done. Um also want to note that we're gonna well actually let's do this first. Approval of minutes. Can someone make a motion about are there any adjustments or can we go ahead and approve uh someone make a motion to approve the minutes from last month?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com